Department of Stomatology (Endodontic section), School of Dentistry, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009, Sevilla, Spain.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jul 8;28(8):421. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05814-z.
To investigate the outcome of elective full pulpotomy, using calcium silicate-based cements (CSBC), after 2 years, in symptomatic mature permanent teeth with carious lesions, diagnosed as irreversible pulpitis, and analyse the capacity of Wolters et al. (2017) classification to predict the likelihood of treatment failure.
The treatment records of 56 patients with symptomatic mature teeth with carious lesions, diagnosed as irreversible pulpitis and treated by elective full pulpotomy, using CSBCs as pulp capping materials, were reviewed. Thirteen teeth were excluded. The remaining 43 teeth were evaluated retrospectively at 24 months. Fisher`s exact test with the Lancaster's mid-P adjustment was used to assess different outcomes amongst the diagnostic categories.
Four of the cases failed before 24 months and required root canal treatment (RCT). Overall success rate at 2 years was 90.7% (39 of 43). An inverse, but non-significant, correlation was observed between the severity of pulpitis according to the Wolters classification and the treatment success rate (p > 0.05). The type of CSBC used was associated to the success rate (OR = 10.5; 95% C.I. = 0.5 - 207.4; p = 0.027), being 82% with Endosequence and 100% with Biodentine. Postoperative pain associated significantly to lower success rate (66.7%) (Odds ratio = 8.0; 95% C.I. = 0.7 - 95.9; p = 0.047).
Elective full pulpotomy using a CSBC was a successful choice for the treatment of mature permanent teeth with symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis. There were no significant differences between the success rate of mild, moderate and severe pulpitis. Postoperative pain could be considered a risk marker for failure of full pulpotomy. The term "irreversible pulpitis" should be re-signified to indicate the need for access to the pulp chamber, rather than an indication for extraction or RCT.
通过对采用基于硅酸钙的水泥(CSBC)进行选择性全牙髓切除术治疗有症状的成熟恒牙,随访 2 年,评估其治疗效果,分析 Wolters 等(2017)分类法预测治疗失败的可能性。
回顾性分析了 56 例采用 CSBC 作为盖髓材料进行选择性全牙髓切除术治疗的有症状成熟恒牙伴龋损、诊断为不可复性牙髓炎患者的治疗记录。其中 13 颗牙被排除在外。剩余的 43 颗牙在 24 个月时进行了回顾性评估。采用 Fisher 确切检验(Lancaster 的 mid-P 调整),评估不同诊断类别的不同结局。
4 例患者在 24 个月前失败,需要根管治疗(RCT)。2 年总成功率为 90.7%(43 例中的 39 例)。根据 Wolters 分类法,牙髓炎的严重程度与治疗成功率呈负相关(p>0.05),但无统计学意义。所使用的 CSBC 类型与成功率相关(OR=10.5;95%CI=0.5-207.4;p=0.027),Endosequence 的成功率为 82%,Biodentine 的成功率为 100%。术后疼痛与较低的成功率显著相关(66.7%)(比值比=8.0;95%CI=0.7-95.9;p=0.047)。
采用 CSBC 进行选择性全牙髓切除术是治疗有症状的不可复性牙髓炎成熟恒牙的一种成功选择。轻度、中度和重度牙髓炎的成功率无显著差异。术后疼痛可作为全牙髓切除术失败的风险标志物。“不可复性牙髓炎”这一术语应重新定义为需要进入牙髓腔,而不是指示拔牙或 RCT。