• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析人力资本效应对产业结构升级过程中引入贝叶斯分位数回归的影响。

Analysis of human capital effects introducing Bayesian quantile regression in the process of industrial structural upgrading.

机构信息

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 8;19(7):e0304730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304730. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0304730
PMID:38976701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11230553/
Abstract

In recent years, with the continuous evolution of the global economy and the adjustment of industrial structures, the understanding of the role played by human capital in the process of economic development has become particularly important. However, existing research on the impact of human capital on economic growth often adopts traditional regression methods, failing to comprehensively consider the heterogeneity and nonlinear relationships in the data. Therefore, to more accurately understand the influence of human capital on economic growth at different stages, this study employs Bayesian quantile regression method (BQRM). By incorporating BQRM, a better capture of the dynamic effects of human capital in the process of industrial structure upgrading is achieved, offering policymakers more targeted and effective policy recommendations to drive the economy towards a more sustainable direction. Additionally, the experiment also examines the impact of other key factors such as technological progress, capital investment, and labor market conditions on economic growth. These factors, combined with human capital, collectively promote the upgrading of industrial structure and the sustainable development of the economy. This study, by introducing BQRM, aims to fill the research gap regarding the impact of human capital on economic development during the industrial structural upgrading process. In the backdrop of the ongoing evolution of the global economy and adjustments in industrial structure, understanding the role of human capital in economic development becomes particularly crucial. To better comprehend the direct impact of human capital, the experiment collected macroeconomic data, including GDP, industrial structure, labor skills, and human capital, from different regions over the past 20 years. By establishing a dynamic panel data model, this study delves into the trends in the impact of human capital at various stages of industrial structure upgrading. The research findings indicate that during the high-speed growth phase, the contribution of human capital to GDP growth is 15.2% ± 2.1%, rising to 23.8% ± 3.4% during the period of industrial structure adjustment. Technological progress, capital investment, and labor market conditions also significantly influence economic growth at different stages. In terms of innovation improvement, this study pioneers the use of BQRM to gain a deeper understanding of the role of human capital in economic development, providing more targeted and effective policy recommendations. Ultimately, to promote sustainable economic development, the experiment proposes concrete and targeted policy recommendations, emphasizing government support in training and skill development. This study not only fills a research gap in the relevant field but also provides substantive references for decision-makers, driving the economy towards a more sustainable direction.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/7ede418900f3/pone.0304730.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/1fc90b53ec16/pone.0304730.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/b159099eda97/pone.0304730.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/19f8c9bea0f6/pone.0304730.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/e6e0c69f859f/pone.0304730.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/89a90555dd6c/pone.0304730.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/dfd4a2a5f649/pone.0304730.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/1700df0d72a2/pone.0304730.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/7ede418900f3/pone.0304730.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/1fc90b53ec16/pone.0304730.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/b159099eda97/pone.0304730.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/19f8c9bea0f6/pone.0304730.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/e6e0c69f859f/pone.0304730.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/89a90555dd6c/pone.0304730.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/dfd4a2a5f649/pone.0304730.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/1700df0d72a2/pone.0304730.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c17e/11230553/7ede418900f3/pone.0304730.g008.jpg
摘要

近年来,随着全球经济的不断演变和产业结构的调整,人们对人力资本在经济发展过程中所起作用的认识变得尤为重要。然而,现有的关于人力资本对经济增长影响的研究往往采用传统的回归方法,未能全面考虑数据中的异质性和非线性关系。因此,为了更准确地了解人力资本在不同阶段对经济增长的影响,本研究采用了贝叶斯分位数回归方法(BQRM)。通过引入 BQRM,可以更好地捕捉人力资本在产业结构升级过程中的动态效应,为政策制定者提供更有针对性和有效的政策建议,以推动经济向更可持续的方向发展。此外,实验还检验了技术进步、资本投资和劳动力市场条件等其他关键因素对经济增长的影响。这些因素与人力资本一起,共同推动产业结构升级和经济的可持续发展。本研究通过引入 BQRM,旨在填补人力资本对产业结构升级过程中经济发展影响的研究空白。在全球经济不断演变和产业结构调整的背景下,理解人力资本在经济发展中的作用变得尤为重要。为了更好地理解人力资本的直接影响,实验收集了过去 20 年来自不同地区的宏观经济数据,包括 GDP、产业结构、劳动力技能和人力资本。通过建立动态面板数据模型,本研究深入探讨了人力资本在产业结构升级各个阶段的影响趋势。研究结果表明,在高速增长阶段,人力资本对 GDP 增长的贡献为 15.2%±2.1%,在产业结构调整阶段上升至 23.8%±3.4%。技术进步、资本投资和劳动力市场条件也在不同阶段对经济增长产生显著影响。在创新改进方面,本研究率先采用 BQRM 来深入了解人力资本在经济发展中的作用,提供更有针对性和有效的政策建议。最终,为了促进可持续经济发展,实验提出了具体而有针对性的政策建议,强调政府在培训和技能发展方面的支持。本研究不仅填补了相关领域的研究空白,还为决策者提供了实质性的参考,推动经济向更可持续的方向发展。

相似文献

1
Analysis of human capital effects introducing Bayesian quantile regression in the process of industrial structural upgrading.分析人力资本效应对产业结构升级过程中引入贝叶斯分位数回归的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 8;19(7):e0304730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304730. eCollection 2024.
2
How Population Aging Affects Industrial Structure Upgrading: Evidence from China.人口老龄化如何影响产业结构升级:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16093. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316093.
3
The impact of human capital on green economic efficiency: evidence from 280 prefectural cities in China.人力资本对绿色经济效率的影响:来自中国 280 个地级市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(28):72415-72429. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27014-0. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
The Impact of Health Investment on Industrial Structure: "Spillover" or "Crowding Out"?-Evidence From Emerging Market Countries.健康投资对产业结构的影响:“溢出”还是“挤出”?——来自新兴市场国家的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 24;9:833961. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.833961. eCollection 2021.
5
The impact of the digital economy on industrial structure upgrading in resource-based cities: Evidence from China.数字经济对资源型城市产业结构升级的影响:来自中国的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0298694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298694. eCollection 2024.
6
Unleashing the horizons of labor quality, digitalization on upgradation of industrial structure in Asian economies.释放劳动力质量的潜力,数字化推动亚洲经济体产业结构升级。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 18;18(7):e0288866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288866. eCollection 2023.
7
"Green" economic development in China: quantile regression evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt.中国的“绿色”经济发展:来自长江经济带的分位数回归证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):60572-60583. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20197-y. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
8
Digital economy drives regional industrial structure upgrading: Empirical evidence from China's comprehensive big data pilot zone policy.数字经济推动区域产业结构升级:来自中国综合大数据试验区政策的经验证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 8;18(12):e0295609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295609. eCollection 2023.
9
Digital Economy Development, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China's Cities.数字经济发展、产业结构升级与绿色全要素生产率:来自中国城市的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 19;19(4):2414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042414.
10
The impact of digital economy on the upgrading of manufacturing structure.数字经济对制造业结构升级的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 25;19(7):e0307184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307184. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Human capital, technological progress and industrial restructuring.人力资本、技术进步与产业结构调整。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0325978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325978. eCollection 2025.
2
Correction: Analysis of human capital effects introducing Bayesian quantile regression in the process of industrial structural upgrading.修正:在产业结构升级过程中引入贝叶斯分位数回归的人力资本效应分析
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 8;20(4):e0322560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322560. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Heterogeneity effects of environmental regulation policy synergy on ecological resilience: considering the moderating role of industrial structure.环境规制政策协同对生态弹性的异质性影响:考虑产业结构的调节作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(6):8566-8584. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31647-6. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
2
Revisiting the human capital-economic growth nexus in Africa.重新审视非洲的人力资本与经济增长之间的关系。
SN Bus Econ. 2023;3(7):115. doi: 10.1007/s43546-023-00494-5. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
3
Green Finance, Industrial Structure Upgrading, and High-Quality Economic Development-Intermediation Model Based on the Regulatory Role of Environmental Regulation.
绿色金融、产业结构升级与高质量经济发展——基于环境规制调节作用的中介效应模型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;20(2):1420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021420.
4
Fiscal decentralization, industrial structure upgrading, and carbon emissions: evidence from China.财政分权、产业结构升级与碳排放:来自中国的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):39210-39222. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24971-w. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
5
Bayesian variable selection in quantile regression with random effects: an application to Municipal Human Development Index.具有随机效应的分位数回归中的贝叶斯变量选择:对城市人类发展指数的应用。
J Appl Stat. 2021 Jul 11;49(13):3436-3450. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1950654. eCollection 2022.
6
A data-driven approach for the measurement and improvement of regional industrial ecological efficiency for carbon peaking and carbon neutralization.一种用于测量和提高区域工业生态效率以实现碳达峰和碳中和的数据驱动方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(3):7655-7670. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22699-1. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
7
Digital Economy Development, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China's Cities.数字经济发展、产业结构升级与绿色全要素生产率:来自中国城市的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 19;19(4):2414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042414.
8
Does green credit promote industrial upgrading?-analysis of mediating effects based on technological innovation.绿色信贷是否促进产业升级?——基于技术创新的中介效应分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(27):41577-41589. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17248-1. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
9
Environmental degradation and financial development: do institutional quality and human capital make a difference in G11 nations?环境退化与金融发展:制度质量和人力资本对G11国家有影响吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(25):38017-38025. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18825-8. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10
Heterogeneous environmental regulation and industrial structure upgrading: evidence from China.异质环境规制与产业结构升级:来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(9):13369-13385. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16591-7. Epub 2021 Sep 30.