School of Psychology and Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
School of Psychology and Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Appetite. 2024 Oct 1;201:107589. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107589. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
Previous research employing the person-centred approach of Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) with parent-reported data of their child's eating behaviour identified four distinct eating profiles in 3-6-year-old children: typical, avid, happy, and avoidant eating (Pickard et al., 2023). In this follow-up study, the same parents were asked to self-report their own eating behaviour (N = 785) and LPA was conducted to determine the latent eating profiles of the parents/caregivers. The LPA showed that a four-profile solution best represented the sample of parents, termed: typical eating (n = 325, 41.4%), avid eating (n = 293, 37.3%), emotional eating (n = 123, 15.7%) and avoidant eating (n = 44, 5.6%). Multiple mediation analysis was then conducted to examine both the direct associations between parents' eating profiles and the child's probability of eating profile membership, as well as the indirect associations through the mediatory role of specific parental feeding practices. The results suggested direct links between parent and child eating profiles, with the 'avid eating' and 'avoidant eating' profiles in parents predicting similar profiles in their children. Feeding practices, such as using food for emotional regulation, providing balanced and varied food, and promoting a healthy home food environment, mediated associations between parent and child eating profiles. This research provides novel evidence to reinforce the need for interventions to be specifically tailored to both the parent's and child's eating profiles. The work also provides an interesting avenue for future longitudinal examination of whether the parents' provision of a healthy home food environment could protect against intergenerational transmission of less favourable eating behaviours.
先前采用潜在剖面分析(LPA)的人本主义方法,利用父母对其子女饮食行为的报告数据,在 3-6 岁儿童中识别出四种不同的饮食模式:典型、贪婪、快乐和回避型饮食(Pickard 等人,2023 年)。在这项后续研究中,同样的父母被要求自我报告他们自己的饮食行为(N=785),并进行 LPA 以确定父母/照顾者的潜在饮食模式。LPA 显示,四模式解决方案最能代表父母样本,被称为:典型饮食(n=325,41.4%)、贪婪饮食(n=293,37.3%)、情绪饮食(n=123,15.7%)和回避饮食(n=44,5.6%)。然后进行了多重中介分析,以检验父母饮食模式与儿童饮食模式成员可能性之间的直接关联,以及通过特定的父母喂养实践的中介作用的间接关联。结果表明父母和儿童饮食模式之间存在直接联系,父母的“贪婪饮食”和“回避饮食”模式预测了他们孩子的相似模式。喂养实践,如使用食物进行情绪调节、提供均衡多样的食物以及促进健康的家庭食物环境,调节了父母和儿童饮食模式之间的关联。这项研究提供了新的证据,强调需要针对父母和儿童的饮食模式进行专门的干预。这项工作还为未来的纵向研究提供了一个有趣的途径,即父母提供健康的家庭食物环境是否可以防止代际传递不太有利的饮食行为。