Calnitsky David, Wannamaker Kaitlin Pauline
Department of Sociology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Sociology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Br J Sociol. 2024 Dec;75(5):769-790. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13131. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
This paper explores the cascading influence of revolutionary moments on democracy and inequality, not at home, but across borders. We use data on revolutions and other social upheavals over the past 120 years and examine their cross-national impact on a range of variables in neighboring countries. Engaging with debates on whether substantial democracy and equality increases require extraordinary circumstances, our research investigates whether revolutionary activities induce consequential spillovers, such as policy concessions from elites in neighboring contexts. In exploring spillover effects, the paper examines how significant events in one nation influence social life in adjacent ones. It encompasses an analysis of 171 countries over two centuries, connecting data on revolution with democracy and equality metrics, and hypothesizing that elite fear of revolutionary contagion may necessitate democracy and equality concessions to mitigate potential uprisings. Findings suggest neighboring revolutions positively impact domestic democracy and equality levels. We observe significant increases in an index of democracy and two indices of economic egalitarianism, although one of the egalitarianism measures is robust to all model specifications. Additionally, we find that isolated "protest-led ousters" can moderately increase suffrage and one of our indices of egalitarianism, while coups do not seem to impact democracy or inequality variables. By examining various upheaval types and outcomes across time and space, the study illuminates the causal relationship between global mobilizations and local changes, providing insights into how global events inform domestic outcomes.
本文探讨革命时刻对民主和不平等的连锁影响,并非在本国,而是跨国界的影响。我们使用过去120年里关于革命及其他社会动荡的数据,并考察它们对邻国一系列变量的跨国影响。参与关于实质性民主和平等的增加是否需要特殊情况的辩论,我们的研究调查革命活动是否会引发重大的溢出效应,比如邻国精英做出的政策让步。在探究溢出效应时,本文考察一个国家的重大事件如何影响其邻国的社会生活。它涵盖了对两个世纪内171个国家的分析,将革命数据与民主和平等指标联系起来,并假设精英对革命蔓延的恐惧可能使他们不得不做出民主和平等方面的让步,以缓解潜在的起义。研究结果表明邻国的革命对国内的民主和平等水平有积极影响。我们观察到民主指数和两个经济平等指数显著上升,尽管其中一个平等主义指标在所有模型设定下都很稳健。此外,我们发现孤立的“抗议引发的政权更迭”能适度增加选举权和我们的一个平等主义指数,而政变似乎不会影响民主或不平等变量。通过考察不同时间和空间的各种动荡类型及结果,这项研究阐明了全球动员与地方变革之间的因果关系,为全球事件如何影响国内结果提供了见解。