• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Outcomes of biological therapy in patients with severe asthma with chronic rhinosinusitis in Saudi Arabia: patients with nasal polyps versus those without nasal polyps.沙特阿拉伯严重哮喘合并慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者接受生物治疗的结局:伴鼻息肉与不伴鼻息肉患者的比较。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03139-x.
2
Impact of biological therapies on laboratory outcomes and FEV1 in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma with chronic rhinosinusitis: a real-life study from Saudi Arabia.生物疗法对患有慢性鼻窦炎的重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者实验室检查结果及第一秒用力呼气容积的影响:一项来自沙特阿拉伯的真实世界研究。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2024 Sep 9;19(1):985. doi: 10.5826/mrm.2024.985.
3
Efficacy of dupilumab on chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and concomitant asthma in biologic-naive and biologic-pretreated patients.度普利尤单抗治疗生物制剂初治和生物制剂预处理的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉和哮喘患者的疗效。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2411018. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2411018. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
4
Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 and LIBERTY NP SINUS-52): results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 3 trials.度普利尤单抗治疗伴有鼻息肉的重度慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的疗效和安全性(LIBERTY NP SINUS-24 和 LIBERTY NP SINUS-52):两项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组 3 期临床试验的结果。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1638-1650. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31881-1. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
5
The Efficacy of Omalizumab in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Comorbid Severe Allergic Asthma.奥马珠单抗治疗伴有严重过敏性哮喘的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者的疗效。
Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 May 27;23(3):245-256. doi: 10.18502/ijaai.v23i3.15635.
6
Long-term efficacy of dupilumab in asthma with or without chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps.度普利尤单抗在伴有或不伴有慢性鼻-鼻窦炎和鼻息肉的哮喘患者中的长期疗效。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Feb;130(2):215-224. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.11.006. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
7
Comorbid asthma in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: did dupilumab make a difference?慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者的合并哮喘:度普利尤单抗是否有影响?
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02556-8.
8
Real-life effects of dupilumab in patients with severe type 2 asthma, according to atopic trait and presence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.根据特应性特征和是否存在伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎,评估度普利尤单抗治疗重度 2 型哮喘患者的真实世界疗效。
Front Immunol. 2023 Mar 30;14:1121237. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1121237. eCollection 2023.
9
Benralizumab Effectiveness in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma with and without Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Real-World Multicenter Study.贝那鲁肽在伴有和不伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的严重嗜酸性哮喘中的疗效:一项真实世界的多中心研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Dec;9(12):4371-4380.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Versus Omalizumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps and Asthma: EVEREST Trial Design.度普利尤单抗对比奥马珠单抗治疗伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎和哮喘的疗效和安全性:EVEREST 试验设计。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Nov;36(6):788-795. doi: 10.1177/19458924221112211. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrospective Analysis of Biologic Agent Utilization in Severe Asthma: Impact on Exacerbation Rates, Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second (FEV1), Eosinophils, and IgE Levels.重度哮喘生物制剂使用情况的回顾性分析:对急性加重率、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、嗜酸性粒细胞及免疫球蛋白E水平的影响
Cureus. 2023 Aug 1;15(8):e42818. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42818. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
A real-life comparison of pulmonary and nasal outcomes in patients with severe asthma and nasal polyposis treated with T2-biologics.使用T2生物制剂治疗的重度哮喘合并鼻息肉患者肺部和鼻腔转归的真实世界比较
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Feb 14;16(2):100746. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100746. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Biological Therapy of Severe Asthma and Nasal Polyps.重度哮喘和鼻息肉的生物治疗
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 16;12(6):976. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060976.
4
Benefits of biologic therapy administered for asthma on co-existent chronic rhinosinusitis: A real-world study.生物疗法治疗哮喘对并存的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的益处:一项真实世界研究。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021 Aug;11(8):1152-1161. doi: 10.1002/alr.22774. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Real-World Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Severe Allergic Asthma: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.奥马珠单抗治疗重度过敏性哮喘的真实世界疗效:一项观察性研究的荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jul;9(7):2702-2714. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Management of severe asthma: summary of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society task force report.重度哮喘的管理:欧洲呼吸学会/美国胸科学会特别工作组报告摘要
Breathe (Sheff). 2020 Jun;16(2):200058. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0058-2020.
7
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021.《2021年变应性鼻炎和鼻科学国际共识声明:鼻窦炎》
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021 Mar;11(3):213-739. doi: 10.1002/alr.22741.
8
Biology and Function of Eosinophils in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With or Without Nasal Polyps.伴或不伴鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎中嗜酸性粒细胞的生物学特性及功能
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2021 Jan;13(1):8-22. doi: 10.4168/aair.2021.13.1.8.
9
Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Asthma.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉与哮喘。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Mar;9(3):1133-1141. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.063. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
10
Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in nasal polyposis: 2 randomized phase 3 trials.奥马珠单抗治疗鼻息肉的疗效和安全性:两项随机 3 期临床试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Sep;146(3):595-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

沙特阿拉伯严重哮喘合并慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者接受生物治疗的结局:伴鼻息肉与不伴鼻息肉患者的比较。

Outcomes of biological therapy in patients with severe asthma with chronic rhinosinusitis in Saudi Arabia: patients with nasal polyps versus those without nasal polyps.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Old Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Cairo, 4240310, Egypt.

Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region (AFHSR), Khamis Mushayt, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03139-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12890-024-03139-x
PMID:38978039
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11232303/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study's purposes were to evaluate the impact of biological therapies on outcomes in patients with severe asthma (SA) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and to compare these effects among those with NP (CRSwNP) versus those without NP (CRSsNP) in the "real-world" setting in Saudi Arabian patients.

METHODS

From March to September 2022, a retrospective observational cohort study was undertaken at the severe asthma clinics of the Armed Forces Hospital-Southern Region (AFHSR) and King Khalid University Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia, to delineate the effects of dupilumab therapy. Outcomes were assessed, including clinical outcomes, FEV1, and laboratory findings before and one year after dupilumab. Post-therapy effects were compared between CRSwNP and CRSsNP.

RESULTS

Fifty subjects were enrolled, with a mean age of 46.56. There were 27 (54%) females and 23(46%) males. Significant improvements in clinical parameters (frequency of asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations, the use of OCs, anosmia, SNOTT-22, and the ACT), FEV1, and laboratory ones (serum IgE and eosinophilic count) were observed 6 and 12 months after using dupilumab (p < 0.001), respectively. However, after 12 months of dupilumab therapy, there were no significant differences between those with and without NP with regards to clinical (anosmia, ACT, and OCs use), laboratory (eosinophilic count, serum IgE level) parameters, and FEV1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CRS experienced significant improvements in clinical, FEV1, and laboratory outcomes after dupilumab therapy. However, these improvements were not maintained when comparing CRSwNP with CRSsNP. There were no significant differences between those with and without NP regarding ACT and OCs use or laboratory (eosinophilic count, serum IgE level) parameters. Further prospective multicenter studies are warranted.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估生物疗法对沙特阿拉伯严重哮喘(SA)和慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)患者结局的影响,并在“真实世界”环境中比较伴有和不伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)与不伴鼻息肉(CRSsNP)的患者之间的这些影响。

方法

2022 年 3 月至 9 月,在沙特阿拉伯阿卜哈的武装部队医院南部地区(AFHSR)和 King Khalid 大学医院的严重哮喘诊所进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究,以描绘度普利尤单抗治疗的效果。评估了包括临床结局、FEV1 和治疗前后一年的实验室发现在内的结局。比较了 CRSwNP 和 CRSsNP 之间的治疗后效果。

结果

共纳入 50 名患者,平均年龄为 46.56 岁。女性 27 名(54%),男性 23 名(46%)。使用度普利尤单抗后 6 和 12 个月,临床参数(哮喘加重和住院频率、OC 使用、嗅觉丧失、SNOTT-22 和 ACT)、FEV1 和实验室参数(血清 IgE 和嗜酸性粒细胞计数)均有显著改善(p<0.001)。然而,在使用度普利尤单抗治疗 12 个月后,伴有和不伴有 NP 的患者之间在临床(嗅觉丧失、ACT 和 OC 使用)、实验室(嗜酸性粒细胞计数、血清 IgE 水平)参数和 FEV1%方面均无显著差异。

结论

CRS 患者在接受度普利尤单抗治疗后,在临床、FEV1 和实验室结局方面均有显著改善。然而,在比较 CRSwNP 与 CRSsNP 时,这些改善并未持续。伴有和不伴有 NP 的患者在 ACT 和 OC 使用或实验室(嗜酸性粒细胞计数、血清 IgE 水平)参数方面无显著差异。需要进一步进行前瞻性多中心研究。