Interprofessional Education Coordinator, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
School of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
J Interprof Care. 2024 Sep-Oct;38(5):864-874. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2024.2371339. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in stroke care is accepted as best practice and necessary given the multi-system challenges and array of professionals involved. Our two-part stroke team simulations offer an intentional interprofessional educational experience (IPE) embedded in pre-licensure occupational therapy, physical therapy, pharmacy, medicine, nursing and speech-language pathology curricula. This six-year mixed method program evaluation aimed to determine if simulation delivery differences necessitated by COVID-19 impacted students' IPC perception, ratings, and reported learning. Following both simulations, the (ICCAS) and free-text self-reported learning was voluntarily and anonymously collected. A factorial ANOVA using the ICCAS interprofessional competency factors compared scores across delivery methods. Content and category analysis was done for free-text responses. Overall, delivery formats did not affect positive changes in pre-post ICCAS scores. However, pre and post ICCAS scores were significantly different for interprofessional competencies of roles/responsibilities and collaborative patient/family centered approach. Analysis of over 10,000 written response to four open-ended questions revealed the simulation designs evoked better understanding of others' and own scope of practice, how roles and shared leadership change based on context and client need, and the value of each team member's expertise. Virtual-experience-only students noted preference for an in-person stroke clinic simulation opportunity.
跨专业协作(IPC)在中风护理中被认为是最佳实践,鉴于多系统挑战和涉及的众多专业人员,这也是必要的。我们的两部分中风团队模拟提供了一个有意的跨专业教育体验(IPE),嵌入在执业前的职业治疗、物理治疗、药学、医学、护理和言语病理学课程中。这项为期六年的混合方法方案评估旨在确定 COVID-19 带来的模拟交付差异是否影响了学生对 IPC 的感知、评价和报告学习。在两次模拟之后,自愿和匿名收集了(ICCAS)和自由文本自我报告的学习情况。使用 ICCAS 跨专业能力因素的析因方差分析比较了不同交付方法的分数。对自由文本的回答进行了内容和类别分析。总体而言,交付格式并没有影响 ICCAS 评分在前后的积极变化。然而,对于角色/责任和协作的患者/家庭为中心的方法的跨专业能力,预前后 ICCAS 评分有显著差异。对四个开放式问题的 10000 多条书面回答的分析表明,模拟设计唤起了对他人和自己实践范围的更好理解,以及角色和共享领导如何根据情境和客户需求而变化,以及每个团队成员的专业知识的价值。仅接受虚拟体验的学生表示更喜欢面对面的中风诊所模拟机会。