Suppr超能文献

记录组织知识与经验的程序:一项范围综述

The Procedures for Documenting Organizational Knowledge and Experiences: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Malgard Shiva, Panahi Sirous, Nemati Anaraki Leila, Asadzandi Shadi, Ghalavand Hossein

机构信息

Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.

出版信息

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Mar 26;38:33. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.33. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study was motivated by issues with earlier studies on documenting knowledge and experiences. This scoping review investigates and maps the procedures for documenting organizational knowledge and experiences.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, a scoping review was conducted. Data were obtained by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Embase, and Emerald Insight databases and Persian databases, such as Magiran, Noormags, and Ensani. The selected terms were searched using the Boolean AND/OR operators, phrases, parentheses, and truncations in the title, abstract, keywords, and text word fields. The inclusion criteria were resources relevant to the research question, studies in English and Persian, original research articles, and resources published between 2011 and 2022. Finally, 8 related papers were selected as the research population after screening records.

RESULTS

The review of the selected studies indicates that there have been different steps for documenting knowledge and experiences according to the subject's scope and the goals of the studies. The included articles revealed numerous steps for documentation-including planning, acquisition, registration, evaluation, submission, maintenance, publication, application, payment, and compensation.

CONCLUSION

Although a systematic mechanism for documenting knowledge and experience is essential, many processes and phases are offered for documentation. Therefore, a complete review that synthesizes and integrates past study findings must still be included. Several shortcomings in past research on documenting knowledge and expertise prompted the present study. The results of the present study can be of great use to managers and employees of various organizations in topics such as the creation of standards for documenting knowledge and experiences, organizational-structural planning in this field, and training on different documentation methods.

摘要

背景

本研究受早期知识与经验记录研究中存在的问题所推动。本范围综述调查并梳理了组织知识与经验记录的程序。

方法

遵循系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)扩展版的范围综述(PRISMA-ScR)指南,进行了一项范围综述。通过检索PubMed、科学网、Scopus、ProQuest、Embase和Emerald Insight数据库以及波斯语数据库(如Magiran、Noormags和Ensani)获取数据。使用布尔与/或运算符、短语、括号以及标题、摘要、关键词和文本字段中的截断词来搜索选定的术语。纳入标准为与研究问题相关的资源、英文和波斯语研究、原创研究文章以及2011年至2022年期间发表的资源。最后,筛选记录后选定8篇相关论文作为研究对象。

结果

对选定研究的综述表明,根据研究对象的范围和研究目标,知识与经验记录存在不同步骤。纳入的文章揭示了记录的众多步骤,包括规划、获取、登记、评估、提交、维护、发布、应用、支付和补偿。

结论

尽管记录知识与经验的系统机制至关重要,但提供了许多记录的流程和阶段。因此,仍必须纳入对过去研究结果进行综合和整合的完整综述。过去知识与专业技能记录研究中的若干缺陷促使了本研究。本研究结果在诸如制定知识与经验记录标准、该领域的组织结构规划以及不同记录方法培训等主题方面,对各类组织的管理人员和员工可能会有很大帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1db0/11230601/624c40619d3d/mjiri-38-33-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验