• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受抽象概念困扰:专业知识对知识转移及新手后续表现的影响。

Bothered by abstraction: the effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance.

作者信息

Hinds P J, Patterson M, Pfeffer J

机构信息

Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, California 94305-4026, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2001 Dec;86(6):1232-43. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1232.

DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1232
PMID:11768064
Abstract

Although experts should be well positioned to convey their superior knowledge and skill to novices, the organization of that knowledge, and particularly its level of abstraction, may make it difficult for them to do so. Using an electronic circuit-wiring task, the authors found that experts as compared with beginners used more abstract and advanced statements and fewer concrete statements when providing task instructions to novices. In a 2nd study, the authors found that beginner-instructed novices performed better than expert-instructed novices and reported fewer problems with the instructions when performing the same task. In Study 2, the authors found that although novices performed better on the target task when instructed by beginners, they did better on a different task within the same domain when instructed by experts. The evidence suggests that the abstract, advanced concepts conveyed by experts facilitated the transfer of learning between the different tasks.

摘要

尽管专家理应能够很好地将其卓越的知识和技能传授给新手,但这些知识的组织方式,尤其是其抽象程度,可能会使他们难以做到这一点。通过一项电子电路布线任务,作者发现,与新手相比,专家在向新手提供任务指导时,使用的抽象和高级表述更多,具体表述更少。在第二项研究中,作者发现,由新手指导的新手在执行相同任务时,比由专家指导的新手表现更好,并且在指令方面遇到的问题更少。在研究2中,作者发现,虽然新手在由新手指导时在目标任务上表现更好,但在同一领域的另一项任务上,由专家指导时他们表现得更好。证据表明,专家传达的抽象、高级概念促进了不同任务之间的学习迁移。

相似文献

1
Bothered by abstraction: the effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance.受抽象概念困扰:专业知识对知识转移及新手后续表现的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Dec;86(6):1232-43. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1232.
2
The influence of degree of expertise and objective task complexity on perceived task complexity and performance.专业水平程度和客观任务复杂性对感知任务复杂性及表现的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1320-31. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1320.
3
Expert-novice knowledge of computer programming at different levels of abstraction.
Ergonomics. 1996 Mar;39(3):461-81. doi: 10.1080/00140139608964475.
4
Validation of a Visual-Spatial Secondary Task to Assess Automaticity in Laparoscopic Skills.验证一种用于评估腹腔镜技能自动化的视觉-空间次要任务。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jul-Aug;75(4):1001-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
5
A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.专家和新手腹腔镜与机器人辅助缝合性能比较。
Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):830-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
6
Haste does not always make waste: expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills.欲速则不达并不总是成立:专业技能、注意力导向以及执行感觉运动技能时速度与准确性的关系。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Apr;11(2):373-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196585.
7
Expertise promotes facilitation on a collaborative memory task.专业知识有助于在协作记忆任务中起到促进作用。
Memory. 2009 Jan;17(1):39-48. doi: 10.1080/09658210802524240. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
8
Bothered by abstractness or engaged by cohesion? Experts' explanations enhance novices' deep-learning.被抽象性困扰还是被连贯性吸引?专家的解释能增强新手的深度学习。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Mar;21(1):101-15. doi: 10.1037/xap0000038. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
9
How novice and expert anaesthetists understand expertise in anaesthesia: a qualitative study.新手麻醉师和专家麻醉师如何理解麻醉专业技能:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02180-8.
10
Hemispheric activation differences in novice and expert clinicians during clinical decision making.新手和专家临床医生在临床决策过程中的半球激活差异。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Dec;21(5):921-933. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9648-3. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Gaze behavior reveals automaticity and attention allocation during music teaching vs. observing.注视行为揭示了音乐教学与观察过程中的自动化程度和注意力分配情况。
J Eye Mov Res. 2024 Jul 22;17(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.17.2.3. eCollection 2024.
2
Unpacking the Influence of Visual Density on Pizza Packaging: Sensory Expectations and Purchase Intentions.剖析视觉密度对披萨包装的影响:感官期望与购买意愿
Foods. 2024 Aug 17;13(16):2567. doi: 10.3390/foods13162567.
3
The Procedures for Documenting Organizational Knowledge and Experiences: A Scoping Review.
记录组织知识与经验的程序:一项范围综述
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Mar 26;38:33. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.33. eCollection 2024.
4
Reading dies in complexity: Online news consumers prefer simple writing.阅读死于复杂:网络新闻消费者偏好简洁写作。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 7;10(23):eadn2555. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn2555. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
5
The impact of train-the-trainer programs on the continued professional development of nurses: a systematic review.培训师培训计划对护士持续专业发展的影响:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04998-4.
6
How experts and novices judge other people's knowledgeability from language use.专家和新手如何从语言使用判断他人的知识水平。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1627-1637. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02433-9. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
7
Specificity ratings for Italian data.意大利数据的特异性评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3531-3548. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01974-6. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review.识别与临床知识共享相关的因素:一项系统评价方案
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Apr 28;11:142. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_21. eCollection 2022.
9
Applying Adult Learning Best Practices to Design Immunization Training for Health Care Workers in Ghana.将成人学习最佳实践应用于加纳医护人员免疫接种培训的设计中。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Sep 30;9(3):487-497. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00090.
10
How Experts Adapt Their Gaze Behavior When Modeling a Task to Novices.专家在向新手示范任务时如何调整自己的注视行为。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Sep;44(9):e12893. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12893.