Genitrini Matteo, Fritz Julian, Stöggl Thomas, Schwameder Hermann
Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Hallein-Rif, Austria.
Athlete Science Department, Adidas AG, Herzogenaurach, Germany.
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Jun 24;6:1406824. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1406824. eCollection 2024.
Trail running is an emerging discipline with relatively few studies performed in ecological conditions. The aim of this work was to investigate if and how spatiotemporal parameters (STP) and kinematics differ between initial and final stage of a field trial.
Twenty trail runners (10 F, 10 M) were recruited and ran a solo 9.1 km trial. During the test, participants wore a GPS watch and an IMU-based motion capture system. Running speed, elapsed time, STP and kinematics were compared between initial and final stage, separately for uphill (UH) and downhill (DH) sections.
Running speed decreased in the final stage ( ). Total test time was more correlated to the time elapsed in UH sections. In the final stage and in both UH and DH sections, contact time and duty factor increased, whilst stride length and flight time decreased ( ). In the final stage, ankle joint was more dorsiflexed in stance and swing phases in UH sections and stance phase only in DH sections ( ). In the final stage, knee joint was less extended in swing phase in UH and DH sections, as well as less extended in stance in UH sections ( ). In the final stage, hip joint was less flexed in the swing phase in UH and DH sections ( ). In the final stage, forward trunk lean was higher across the entire gait cycle in in UH sections ( ). Trunk contralateral axial rotation was lower, in DH sections ( ).
During the final stage, results indicate a less efficient propulsion phase, in both UH and DH sections. In UH sections, results suggest lower energy generation at the ankle joint. In DH sections, results suggest that the kinematics of swing leg may play a role in sub-optimizing propulsion phase. This study demonstrates how, in UH and DH sections, similar changes in spatiotemporal parameters can be elicited by dissimilar changes in running kinematics. To optimize performance in trail running, coaches and practitioners are advised to work on different (incline-specific) aspects of running technique.
越野跑是一项新兴的运动项目,在自然环境条件下开展的相关研究较少。本研究旨在探讨在野外试验的初始阶段和最终阶段,时空参数(STP)和运动学特征是否存在差异以及如何存在差异。
招募了20名越野跑者(10名女性,10名男性),让他们独自完成一次9.1公里的试验。在测试过程中,参与者佩戴了GPS手表和基于惯性测量单元(IMU)的运动捕捉系统。分别对上坡(UH)和下坡(DH)路段的初始阶段和最终阶段的跑步速度、经过时间、时空参数和运动学特征进行了比较。
最终阶段跑步速度下降( )。总测试时间与上坡路段所花费的时间相关性更高。在最终阶段以及上坡和下坡路段,着地时间和负荷率增加而步幅和腾空时间减少( )。在最终阶段,在上坡路段的支撑期和摆动期以及下坡路段仅在支撑期,踝关节背屈程度更大( )。在最终阶段,在上坡和下坡路段的摆动期膝关节伸展程度较小,在上坡路段的支撑期膝关节伸展程度也较小( )。在最终阶段,在上坡和下坡路段的摆动期髋关节屈曲程度较小( )。在最终阶段,在上坡路段整个步态周期中身体前倾幅度更大( )。在下坡路段,躯干对侧轴向旋转幅度较小( )。
在最终阶段,结果表明在上坡和下坡路段推进阶段的效率都较低。在上坡路段,结果表明踝关节产生的能量较低。在下坡路段,结果表明摆动腿的运动学特征可能在推进阶段的优化不足中起作用。本研究表明,在上坡和下坡路段,跑步运动学特征的不同变化如何引发时空参数的类似变化。为了优化越野跑表现,建议教练和从业者针对跑步技术的不同(特定坡度)方面进行训练。