Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
J Anim Ecol. 2024 Sep;93(9):1212-1224. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14136. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
Understanding patterns of species diversity is crucial for ecological research and conservation, and this understanding may be improved by studying patterns in the two components of species diversity, species richness and evenness of abundance of species. Variation in species richness and evenness has previously been linked to variation in total abundance of communities as well as productivity gradients. Exploring both components of species diversity is essential because these components could be unrelated or driven by different mechanisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between species richness and evenness in European bird communities along an extensive latitudinal gradient. We examined their relationships with latitude and Net Primary Productivity, which determines energy and matter availability for heterotrophs, as well as their responses to territory densities (i.e. the number of territories per area) and community biomass (i.e. the bird biomass per area). We applied a multivariate Poisson log-normal distribution to unique long-term, high-quality time-series data, allowing us to estimate species richness of the community as well as the variance of this distribution, which acts as an inverse measure of evenness. Evenness in the distribution of abundance of species in the community was independent of species richness. Species richness increased with increasing community biomass, as well as with increasing density. Since both measures of abundance were explained by NPP, species richness was partially explained by energy-diversity theory (i.e. the more energy, the more species sustained by the ecosystem). However, species richness did not increase linearly with NPP but rather showed a unimodal relationship. Evenness was not explained either by productivity nor by any of the aspects of community abundance. This study highlights the importance of considering both richness and evenness to gain a better understanding of variation in species diversity. We encourage the study of both components of species diversity in future studies, as well as use of simulation studies to verify observed patterns between richness and evenness.
理解物种多样性的模式对于生态研究和保护至关重要,通过研究物种多样性的两个组成部分——物种丰富度和物种丰度均匀度的模式,可以提高对这一理解。物种丰富度和均匀度的变化以前与群落的总丰度和生产力梯度的变化有关。探索物种多样性的两个组成部分是必要的,因为这两个组成部分可能是不相关的,或者是由不同的机制驱动的。本研究的目的是调查欧洲鸟类群落沿着广泛的纬度梯度的物种丰富度和均匀度之间的关系。我们研究了它们与纬度和净初级生产力的关系,净初级生产力决定了异养生物的能量和物质供应,以及它们对领地密度(即每单位面积的领地数量)和群落生物量(即每单位面积的鸟类生物量)的响应。我们应用多元泊松对数正态分布来处理独特的长期、高质量的时间序列数据,使我们能够估计群落的物种丰富度以及该分布的方差,方差作为均匀度的逆测度。群落中物种丰度分布的均匀度与物种丰富度无关。物种丰富度随群落生物量的增加而增加,也随密度的增加而增加。由于丰度的两个度量都可以用 NPP 来解释,所以物种丰富度部分可以用能量多样性理论来解释(即生态系统维持的能量越多,物种就越多)。然而,物种丰富度并没有随 NPP 线性增加,而是表现出单峰关系。均匀度也没有被生产力或群落丰度的任何方面所解释。本研究强调了考虑丰富度和均匀度以更好地理解物种多样性变化的重要性。我们鼓励在未来的研究中同时研究物种多样性的两个组成部分,并使用模拟研究来验证丰富度和均匀度之间观察到的模式。