Environmental Studies Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060, USA.
Earth and Oceanographic Science, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME, 04011, USA.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jul;31(33):46073-46086. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34136-6. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
The rapid increase in aquaculture over the last several decades has led to concerns about the environmental impact of fish feeds relying on marine resources for fishmeal (FM). We aim to assess Nannochloropsis sp. QH25 co-product as a viable and sustainable replacement for FM in juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, feeds. We formulated four experimental diets: a reference (FM based), 33N, 66N, and 100N diet (33%, 66%, and 100% co-product replacement). Rainbow trout were randomly assigned to one of 16 tanks and randomly assigned an experimental diet to consume throughout the experiment (64 days total), with four replicate tanks per diet. We compared the phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) digestibility, emissions, and growth between diets and, compared six environmental impacts (biotic resource use (BRU), global warming potential (GWP), water use, land use, marine eutrophication potential (MEP), and freshwater eutrophication potential (FEP)) of each diet. Our results indicate that replacing FM with co-product did not significantly alter growth. P digestibility of the experimental and reference diets was comparable. BRU conversion ratio was significantly lower in the experimental diets. However, there were significantly higher water and land use conversion ratios but insignificantly higher results in GWP, MEP, and FEP between the reference and 100N diet.
在过去几十年中,水产养殖业的迅速发展引起了人们对依赖海洋资源生产鱼粉(FM)的鱼类饲料对环境影响的关注。我们旨在评估 Nannochloropsis sp. QH25 副产物作为替代幼虹鳟(Oncorhynchus mykiss)饲料中 FM 的可行且可持续的替代品。我们设计了四种实验性饲料:对照(基于 FM)、33N、66N 和 100N 饲料(分别替代 33%、66%和 100%的副产物)。虹鳟鱼被随机分配到 16 个水箱中的一个,并随机分配一种实验性饲料供其在整个实验期间食用(共 64 天),每种饲料有四个重复水箱。我们比较了不同饲料之间的磷(P)和氮(N)消化率、排放物和生长情况,并比较了每种饲料的六个环境影响(生物资源利用(BRU)、全球变暖潜势(GWP)、用水量、土地利用、海洋富营养化潜势(MEP)和淡水富营养化潜势(FEP))。我们的结果表明,用副产物替代 FM 不会显著影响生长。实验和对照饲料的 P 消化率相当。实验饲料的 BRU 转化率明显较低。然而,在实验饲料和对照饲料之间,水和土地利用的转化比显著更高,但 GWP、MEP 和 FEP 的结果没有显著差异。