Buizza A, Léger A, Berthoz A, Schmid R
Exp Brain Res. 1979 Aug 1;36(3):509-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00238519.
In order to examine otolithic contribution to eye movements ten subjects were asked to track either a moving acoustic target or a stationary target during subject linear motion on a cart. The relative displacement between the subject and the target was the same in the two situations. Recordings of eye movements during subject lateral acceleration in the dark without any task, or with the task of tracking an imagined stationary target were made as a control. The frequencies ranged between 0.15 and 0.3 Hz and peak acceleration between 0.55 and 1.2 m/s2. No lateral eye movements (L-nystagmus) were recorded in the dark. Only saccadic eye movements were recorded during the tracking of a moving acoustic target. Slow eye movements interspersed by saccades were observed when the moving subject tracked an imagined or an acoustic stationary target. Contribution of the slow phase to tracking was more important in the presence of an acoustic target than in the presence of imagined target. The results are interpreted in terms of an otolithic contribution to the central reconstruction of the acoustic target velocity, or in terms of an adaptive control of the otolithic-ocular reflex gain. A conceptual model accounting for these interpretations is proposed.
为了研究耳石对眼动的作用,10名受试者被要求在小车上进行直线运动时跟踪一个移动的声学目标或一个静止目标。在这两种情况下,受试者与目标之间的相对位移是相同的。作为对照,在黑暗中无任何任务时或在跟踪想象中的静止目标任务时,记录受试者横向加速度期间的眼动情况。频率范围在0.15至0.3赫兹之间,峰值加速度在0.55至1.2米/秒²之间。在黑暗中未记录到水平眼动(L-眼震)。在跟踪移动的声学目标时仅记录到扫视眼动。当移动的受试者跟踪想象中的或声学静止目标时,观察到有被扫视打断的缓慢眼动。在存在声学目标时,慢相在跟踪中的作用比在存在想象目标时更重要。这些结果可从耳石对声学目标速度的中枢重建的作用方面来解释,或者从耳石-眼反射增益的适应性控制方面来解释。提出了一个解释这些结果的概念模型。