Human ocular responses to translation of the observer and of the scene: dependence on viewing distance.

Recent experiments on monkeys have indicated that the eye movements induced by brief translation of either the observer or the visual scene are a linear function of the inverse of the viewing distance. For the movements of the observer, the room was dark and responses were attributed to a translational vestibulo-ocular reflex (TVOR) that senses the motion through the otolith organs; for the movements of the scene, which elicit ocular following, the scene was projected and adjusted in size and speed so that the retinal stimulation was the same at all distances. The shared dependence on viewing distance was consistent with the hypothesis that the TVOR and ocular following are synergistic and share central pathways. The present experiments looked for such dependencies on viewing distance in human subjects. When briefly accelerated along the interaural axis in the dark, human subjects generated compensatory eye movements that were also a linear function of the inverse of the viewing distance to a previously fixated target. These responses, which were attributed to the TVOR, were somewhat weaker than those previously recorded from monkeys using similar methods. When human subjects faced a tangent screen onto which patterned images were projected, brief motion of those images evoked ocular following responses that showed statistically significant dependence on viewing distance only with low-speed stimuli (10 degrees/s). This dependence was at best weak and in the reverse direction of that seen with the TVOR, i.e., responses increased as viewing distance increased. We suggest that in generating an internal estimate of viewing distance subjects may have used a confounding cue in the ocular-following paradigm--the size of the projected scene--which was varied directly with the viewing distance in these experiments (in order to preserve the size of the retinal image). When movements of the subject were randomly interleaved with the movements of the scene--to encourage the expectation of ego-motion--the dependence of ocular following on viewing distance altered significantly: with higher speed stimuli (40 degrees/s) many responses (63%) now increased significantly as viewing distance decreased, though less vigorously than the TVOR. We suggest that the expectation of motion results in the subject placing greater weight on cues such as vergence and accommodation that provide veridical distance information in our experimental situation: cue selection is context specific.