Wong Sui H, Bancroft Matthew James, Tailor Vijay K, Abbas Mohamed, Sekar Akila, Noble Claire, Theodorou Maria, Kaski Diego
Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 12;2:938088. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2022.938088. eCollection 2022.
It is important to understand the pathophysiology of ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) to improve treatment.
To use modern video-oculography to characterise saccadic eye movements in patients with OMG, including anti-AChR, anti-MuSK, anti-LRP4, and seronegative OMG.
In total, 21 patients with OMG and five age-matched healthy control subjects underwent video-oculography. Participants performed a sequence of horizontal saccades (3 minutes each) at ±5°, ± 10°, and ±20°, followed by 3 minutes of saccades directed at randomly presented targets at ±5°, ± 10°, and ±15°. We recorded the direction, amplitude, duration, peak, and average velocity of each saccade for each task for each participant.
Saccadic amplitude, duration, and average velocity were all lower in OMG patients than in control subjects ( < 0.021). Saccadic amplitude and velocity decreased over time, but this decrease was similar in OMG patients and control subjects. Fixation drift and ocular disparity tended to be greater in OMG patients than in control subjects. Saccadic intrusions occurred more frequently in OMG patients than in control subjects ( < 0.001). No significant effects of time or group by time on fixation drift or ocular disparity were found.
Saccadic velocities in OMG patients differed from those in normal control subjects, which suggests that OMG affects fast-twitch fibres, although fast-twitch fibres were still able to generate "twitch" or "quiver" movements in the presence of even severe ophthalmoplegia. Slow-twitch muscle fibres involved in gaze holding were also affected, accounting for increased fixation drift following saccades. Our objective finding of increased fixation drift and a larger number of saccadic intrusions mirror our anecdotal experience of patients with OMG who report significant diplopia despite minimal ophthalmoplegia on examination. Such microsaccades may be a surrogate for compensation of a gaze-holding deficit in MG.
了解眼肌型重症肌无力(OMG)的病理生理学对于改善治疗很重要。
使用现代视频眼震图来描述OMG患者的眼球扫视运动特征,包括抗乙酰胆碱受体(AChR)、抗肌肉特异性酪氨酸激酶(MuSK)、抗低密度脂蛋白受体相关蛋白4(LRP4)以及血清阴性的OMG患者。
总共21例OMG患者和5名年龄匹配的健康对照者接受了视频眼震图检查。参与者在±5°、±10°和±20°进行一系列水平扫视(每次3分钟),随后在±5°、±10°和±15°针对随机呈现的目标进行3分钟的扫视。我们记录了每个参与者在每个任务中每次扫视的方向、幅度、持续时间、峰值和平均速度。
OMG患者的扫视幅度、持续时间和平均速度均低于对照者(<0.021)。扫视幅度和速度随时间下降,但这种下降在OMG患者和对照者中相似。OMG患者的注视漂移和眼位差异往往比对照者更大。OMG患者的扫视侵入比对照者更频繁(<0.001)。未发现时间或时间与组别的交互作用对注视漂移或眼位差异有显著影响。
OMG患者的扫视速度与正常对照者不同,这表明OMG影响快肌纤维,尽管在存在严重眼肌麻痹的情况下,快肌纤维仍能产生“抽搐”或“颤动”运动。参与注视稳定的慢肌纤维也受到影响,这导致扫视后注视漂移增加。我们关于注视漂移增加和大量扫视侵入的客观发现与我们对OMG患者的经验相符,即尽管检查时眼肌麻痹轻微,但患者仍报告有明显的复视。这种微扫视可能是MG中注视稳定缺陷补偿的替代指标。