Anazor Fitzgerald Chukwuemeka, Relwani Jaikumar, Dhinsa Baljinder Singh
Specialty Trainee Registrar (ST3), Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, East Midlands North (Nottingham) Orthopaedic Rotation, United Kingdom.
Consultant Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeon, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, TN 24 0LZ, United Kingdom.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 7;53:102435. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102435. eCollection 2024 Jun.
The aim of this study was to provide up-to-date evidence on the outcomes for hemiarthroplasties (HAs) that were performed using modern third-generation prostheses (post-2004) for isolated excluding head-splits and fracture-dislocations) three-and four-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs).
PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane register were searched from January 1, 2012, to November 15, 2022, conforming to the PRISMA guidelines. The outcome measures were the complication rates, revision rates, surgery-related postoperative mortality, post-operative clinical outcome scores and radiological outcomes.
432 hemiarthroplasties in 432 patients were performed across the 11 eligible studies (two prospective and 9 retrospective). Three studies compared HA versus reverse shoulder replacement (RSR); one study compared HA with locking plate fixation (LPF) and RSR; one study compared HA with LPF. 61.1 % and 19.4 % of hemiarthroplasties were performed using cemented and uncemented techniques respectively, while cementing data was ill-defined in 19.4 % of shoulders. The results for the outcome measures have been derived directly from the included studies and no statistical pooling was performed, due to heterogeneity in the different study designs and outcomes. Descriptive data synthesis from the included studies showed that third generation HAs have higher overall postoperative complication rates, with similar revision and mortality rates when compared to RSR and LPF for three-and four-part PHFs. RSR and LPF showed better statistically significant improvements than HA for the Constant-Murley score, Quick DASH, forward flexion and abduction. Mixed results were observed for the DASH score, ASES score and internal rotation ROM between RSR/LPF versus HA.
Low to moderate quality evidence from this review showed that even third-generation HA prostheses provided worse overall outcomes than RSR and LPF for three-and four-part PHFs.
本研究的目的是提供关于使用现代第三代假体(2004年后)进行半关节成形术(HA)治疗孤立性三部分和四部分肱骨近端骨折(PHF,不包括头部劈裂和骨折脱位)疗效的最新证据。
按照PRISMA指南,检索了2012年1月1日至2022年11月15日期间的PubMed、Medline、Embase和Cochrane注册库。结局指标包括并发症发生率、翻修率、手术相关术后死亡率、术后临床结局评分和影像学结局。
11项符合条件的研究(2项前瞻性研究和9项回顾性研究)共纳入432例患者,实施了432例半关节成形术。3项研究比较了HA与反向肩关节置换(RSR);1项研究比较了HA与锁定钢板固定(LPF)及RSR;1项研究比较了HA与LPF。分别有61.1%和19.4%的半关节成形术采用骨水泥和非骨水泥技术,而19.4%的肩关节骨水泥固定数据不明确。由于不同研究设计和结局存在异质性,结局指标的结果直接来自纳入研究,未进行统计合并。纳入研究的描述性数据综合显示,对于三部分和四部分PHF,第三代HA总体术后并发症发生率较高,与RSR和LPF相比,翻修率和死亡率相似。在Constant-Murley评分、Quick DASH、前屈和外展方面,RSR和LPF在统计学上比HA有更显著的改善。RSR/LPF与HA之间,DASH评分、ASES评分和内旋活动度(ROM)的结果存在混合情况。
本综述的低至中等质量证据表明,对于三部分和四部分PHF,即使是第三代HA假体的总体疗效也比RSR和LPF差。