School of Nursing, Guizhou Medical University, Guian New District, China.
Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (Ministry of Education), Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jul 15;45(10):e26780. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26780.
Past cross-sectional chronic pain studies have revealed aberrant resting-state brain activity in regions involved in pain processing and affect regulation. However, there is a paucity of longitudinal research examining links of resting-state activity and pain resilience with changes in chronic pain outcomes over time. In this prospective study, we assessed the status of baseline (T1) resting-state brain activity as a biomarker of later impairment from chronic pain and a mediator of the relation between pain resilience and impairment at follow-up. One hundred forty-two adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain completed a T1 assessment comprising a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scan based on regional homogeneity (ReHo) and self-report measures of demographics, pain characteristics, psychological status, pain resilience, pain severity, and pain impairment. Subsequently, pain impairment was reassessed at a 6-month follow-up (T2). Hierarchical multiple regression and mediation analyses assessed relations of T1 ReHo and pain resilience scores with changes in pain impairment. Higher T1 ReHo values in the right caudate nucleus were associated with increased pain impairment at T2, after controlling for all other statistically significant self-report measures. ReHo also partially mediated associations of T1 pain resilience dimensions with T2 pain impairment. T1 right caudate nucleus ReHo emerged as a possible biomarker of later impairment from chronic musculoskeletal pain and a neural mechanism that may help to explain why pain resilience is related to lower levels of later chronic pain impairment. Findings provide empirical foundations for prospective extensions that assess the status of ReHo activity and self-reported pain resilience as markers for later impairment from chronic pain and targets for interventions to reduce impairment. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Resting-state markers of impairment: Higher baseline (T1) regional homogeneity (ReHo) values, localized in the right caudate nucleus, were associated with exacerbations in impairment from chronic musculoskeletal pain at a 6-month follow-up, independent of T1 demographics, pain experiences, and psychological factors. Mediating role of ReHo values: ReHo values in the right caudate nucleus also mediated the relationship between baseline pain resilience levels and later pain impairment among participants. Therapeutic implications: Findings provide empirical foundations for research extensions that evaluate (1) the use of resting-state activity in assessment to identify people at risk for later impairment from pain and (2) changes in resting-state activity as biomarkers for the efficacy of treatments designed to improve resilience and reduce impairment among those in need.
过去的横断面慢性疼痛研究表明,在涉及疼痛处理和情感调节的区域存在异常的静息态大脑活动。然而,纵向研究很少检查静息态活动与慢性疼痛结果随时间变化的疼痛弹性之间的联系。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们评估了基线(T1)静息态大脑活动的状态,作为慢性疼痛后期损害的生物标志物,以及疼痛弹性与随访时疼痛损害之间关系的中介。142 名患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人完成了 T1 评估,包括基于局部一致性(ReHo)的静息态功能磁共振成像扫描和人口统计学、疼痛特征、心理状态、疼痛弹性、疼痛严重程度和疼痛损害的自我报告测量。随后,在 6 个月的随访(T2)时重新评估疼痛损害。层次多元回归和中介分析评估了 T1 ReHo 和疼痛弹性分数与疼痛损害变化的关系。在控制所有其他具有统计学意义的自我报告测量后,右侧尾状核的 T1 ReHo 值较高与 T2 时疼痛损害增加有关。ReHo 还部分介导了 T1 疼痛弹性维度与 T2 疼痛损害之间的关联。T1 右侧尾状核 ReHo 可能成为慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛后期损害的生物标志物,也是一种神经机制,可以帮助解释为什么疼痛弹性与较低水平的后期慢性疼痛损害有关。研究结果为前瞻性扩展提供了经验基础,这些扩展评估了静息态活动和自我报告的疼痛弹性作为慢性疼痛后期损害的标志物和减少损害的干预目标的状态。从业者要点:损害的静息状态标志物:T1(基线)局部一致性(ReHo)值较高,定位于右侧尾状核,与 6 个月随访时慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛损害的加重有关,独立于 T1 人口统计学、疼痛经历和心理因素。ReHo 值的中介作用:右侧尾状核的 ReHo 值也介导了参与者基线疼痛弹性水平与后期疼痛损害之间的关系。治疗意义:研究结果为评估(1)静息态活动在评估中的应用,以识别有后期疼痛损害风险的人群,以及(2)静息态活动作为旨在提高弹性和减少有需要的人的损害的治疗效果的生物标志物的研究扩展提供了经验基础。