• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院治疗感染与多发性硬化症残疾恶化风险。

Hospital-Treated Infections and Risk of Disability Worsening in Multiple Sclerosis.

机构信息

Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Neurol. 2024 Oct;96(4):694-703. doi: 10.1002/ana.27026. Epub 2024 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1002/ana.27026
PMID:38984615
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between infections and disability worsening in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with either B-cell depleting therapy (rituximab) or interferon-beta/glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA).

METHODS

This cohort study spanned from 2000 to 2021, using data from the Swedish MS Registry linked to national health care registries, comprising 8,759 rituximab and 7,561 IFN/GA treatment episodes. The risk of hospital-treated infection was estimated using multivariable Cox models. The association between infections and increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores was assessed using a doubly robust generalized estimating equations model. Additionally, a piece-wise exponential model analyzed events of increased disability beyond defined cut-off values, controlling for relapses, and MRI activity.

RESULTS

Compared with IFN/GA, rituximab displayed increased risk of both inpatient- and outpatient-treated infections (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-2.90 and HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13-1.67, respectively). An inpatient-treated infection was associated with a 0.19-unit increase in EDSS (95% CI, 0.12-0.26). Degree of worsening was greatest for progressive MS, and under IFN/GA treatment, which unlike rituximab, was more commonly associated with MRI activity. After controlling for relapses and MRI activity, inpatient-treated infections were associated with disability worsening in people with relapsing-remitting MS treated with IFN/GA (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.59-2.53), but not in those treated with rituximab.

INTERPRETATION

Compared to IFN/GA, rituximab doubled the infection risk, but reduced the risk of subsequent disability worsening. Further, the risk of worsening after hospital-treated infection was greater with progressive MS than with relapsing-remitting MS. Infection risk should be considered to improve long term outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:694-703.

摘要

目的

研究 B 细胞耗竭疗法(利妥昔单抗)或干扰素-β/醋酸格拉替雷(IFN/GA)治疗多发性硬化症(MS)患者的感染与残疾恶化之间的关联。

方法

这项队列研究的时间跨度为 2000 年至 2021 年,使用了来自瑞典 MS 注册中心与国家卫生保健登记处关联的数据,包括 8759 例利妥昔单抗和 7561 例 IFN/GA 治疗期。使用多变量 Cox 模型估计住院治疗感染的风险。使用双重稳健广义估计方程模型评估感染与扩展残疾状况量表(EDSS)评分增加之间的关联。此外,使用分段指数模型分析了超过规定截止值的残疾加重事件,同时控制了复发和 MRI 活动。

结果

与 IFN/GA 相比,利妥昔单抗的住院和门诊治疗感染风险均增加(风险比 [HR],2.08;95%置信区间 [CI],1.50-2.90 和 HR,1.37;95%CI,1.13-1.67)。住院治疗感染与 EDSS 增加 0.19 单位相关(95%CI,0.12-0.26)。进展性 MS 和 IFN/GA 治疗下的恶化程度最大,与利妥昔单抗不同,IFN/GA 更常见于 MRI 活动。在控制复发和 MRI 活动后,住院治疗感染与接受 IFN/GA 治疗的复发缓解型 MS 患者的残疾恶化相关(HR,2.01;95%CI,1.59-2.53),但与接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者无关。

结论

与 IFN/GA 相比,利妥昔单抗使感染风险增加了一倍,但降低了随后残疾恶化的风险。此外,与复发缓解型 MS 相比,进展性 MS 患者在发生医院感染后的恶化风险更高。应考虑感染风险以改善长期结局。

相似文献

1
Hospital-Treated Infections and Risk of Disability Worsening in Multiple Sclerosis.医院治疗感染与多发性硬化症残疾恶化风险。
Ann Neurol. 2024 Oct;96(4):694-703. doi: 10.1002/ana.27026. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
2
Comparative effectiveness of rituximab relative to IFN-β or glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting MS from the Swedish MS registry.来自瑞典多发性硬化症注册中心的复发缓解型多发性硬化症中,利妥昔单抗相对于 IFN-β 或格拉替雷的疗效比较。
Mult Scler. 2018 Jul;24(8):1087-1095. doi: 10.1177/1352458517713668. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
Rituximab for people with multiple sclerosis.利妥昔单抗治疗多发性硬化症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 8;11(11):CD013874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013874.pub2.
4
Infection Risks Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Fingolimod, Natalizumab, Rituximab, and Injectable Therapies.多发性硬化症患者接受芬戈莫德、那他珠单抗、利妥昔单抗和注射治疗的感染风险。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):184-191. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3365.
5
Treatment with disease-modifying drugs for people with a first clinical attack suggestive of multiple sclerosis.对首次出现提示多发性硬化症临床发作的患者使用疾病修饰药物进行治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 25;4(4):CD012200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012200.pub2.
6
Comparing ocrelizumab to interferon/glatiramer acetate in people with multiple sclerosis over age 60.在60岁以上的多发性硬化症患者中比较奥瑞珠单抗与干扰素/醋酸格拉替雷。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 15;95(8):767-774. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332883.
7
COMBAT-MS: A Population-Based Observational Cohort Study Addressing the Benefit-Risk Balance of Multiple Sclerosis Therapies Compared with Rituximab.COMBAT-MS:一项基于人群的观察性队列研究,旨在评估与利妥昔单抗相比多发性硬化症治疗药物的获益-风险平衡。
Ann Neurol. 2024 Oct;96(4):678-693. doi: 10.1002/ana.27012. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
8
Long-term follow-up for multiple sclerosis patients initially treated with interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate.多发性硬化症患者经干扰素-β和醋酸格拉替雷初始治疗的长期随访。
J Neurol Sci. 2018 Nov 15;394:127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
9
Disease-modifying therapies in managing disability worsening in paediatric-onset multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal analysis of global and national registries.疾病修正疗法在管理儿科发病多发性硬化症残疾恶化中的作用:全球和国家注册研究的纵向分析。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 May;8(5):348-357. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00047-6. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
10
Effect of Disease-Modifying Therapy on Disability in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Over 15 Years.疾病修正疗法对复发缓解型多发性硬化症 15 年残疾进展的影响。
Neurology. 2021 Feb 2;96(5):e783-e797. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011242. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing multiple sclerosis management in older adults.推进老年多发性硬化症的管理。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1038/s41582-025-01115-5.
2
Could rituximab revolutionize multiple sclerosis treatment in Brazil? The missed opportunity for fewer relapses and lower costs.利妥昔单抗能否彻底改变巴西的多发性硬化症治疗现状?错失减少复发和降低成本的机会。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jul 1;49:101171. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101171. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
A disproportionality analysis of surgical site infections across multiple sclerosis disease modifying therapies.
多发性硬化症疾病修正疗法手术部位感染的不均衡性分析
J Neurol. 2025 Feb 22;272(3):223. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-12980-x.
4
Real-world infection risk in multiple sclerosis patients on long-term immunomodulatory treatments.长期接受免疫调节治疗的多发性硬化症患者的真实世界感染风险。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2025 Feb;94:106236. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.106236. Epub 2024 Dec 24.