Taylor Peter C, Downie Bryan, Han Ling, Hawtin Rachael, Hertz Angie, Moots Robert J, Takeuchi Tsutomu
Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.
Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, 94404, USA.
Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00695-w. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
High baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with positive responses to biologic tumor necrosis factor inhibition and negative responses to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) triple therapy. Datasets from three randomized clinical trials in patients with RA were used to test the hypothesis that baseline NLR is associated with improved clinical response to filgotinib in methotrexate (MTX)-naïve or MTX-experienced RA populations.
Patients from FINCH 1 (inadequate response to MTX, MTX-IR; NCT02889796), FINCH 2 (inadequate response to biologic DMARDs; NCT02873936), and FINCH 3 (MTX-naïve; NCT02886728) were classified as baseline NLR-High or baseline NLR-Low based on a previously published cut point of 2.7. In total, 3365 patients were included across the three studies. Differences in clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were determined using linear-regression models.
Control-arm patients (placebo + MTX/placebo + csDMARD) classified as NLR-High exhibited worse continuous clinical and PRO responses at week 12 across clinical trials compared to NLR-Low patients. In contrast, NLR-High patients who received FIL 200 mg + MTX/csDMARD exhibited consistently better responses after 12 weeks compared to NLR-Low patients across clinical trials, clinical endpoints, and PROs. These trends were most prominent among the MTX-IR population.
The 2.7 baseline NLR cut point could be used to enrich for patients most likely to benefit from the addition of filgotinib to background MTX/csDMARD. Use of baseline NLR as part of therapeutic decision-making would not require additional diagnostics and could contribute to improved outcomes for patients with RA.
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02889796; NCT02873936; NCT02886728.
类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的高基线中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与生物肿瘤坏死因子抑制治疗的阳性反应以及传统合成改善病情抗风湿药(csDMARD)三联疗法的阴性反应相关。来自三项RA患者随机临床试验的数据集用于检验以下假设:基线NLR与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)初治或曾用MTX的RA患者对非戈替尼的临床反应改善相关。
根据先前公布的2.7的切点,将来自FINCH 1(对MTX反应不足,MTX-IR;NCT02889796)、FINCH 2(对生物DMARDs反应不足;NCT02873936)和FINCH 3(MTX初治;NCT02886728)的患者分为基线NLR高或基线NLR低。三项研究共纳入3365例患者。使用线性回归模型确定临床结局和患者报告结局(PRO)的差异。
在三项临床试验中,分类为NLR高的对照臂患者(安慰剂+MTX/安慰剂+csDMARD)在第12周时的连续临床和PRO反应比NLR低的患者差。相比之下,在三项临床试验、临床终点和PRO方面,接受非戈替尼200 mg+MTX/csDMARD的NLR高的患者在12周后始终比NLR低的患者反应更好。这些趋势在MTX-IR人群中最为明显。
2.7的基线NLR切点可用于筛选最有可能从在背景MTX/csDMARD基础上加用非戈替尼中获益的患者。将基线NLR用作治疗决策的一部分不需要额外的诊断,并且有助于改善RA患者的结局。
Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02889796;NCT02873936;NCT02886728。