Suppr超能文献

入住心脏重症监护病房的急性心力衰竭患者入院时HeartMate风险评分类别与预后的关系。

Relationship between the HeartMate Risk Score category on admission and outcome in patients with acute heart failure referred to a cardiac intensive care unit.

作者信息

Kametani Motoko, Minami Yuichiro, Hattori Hidetoshi, Haruki Shintaro, Yamaguchi Junichi

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2025 Jan;40(1):55-61. doi: 10.1007/s00380-024-02436-z. Epub 2024 Jul 10.

Abstract

The HeartMate Risk Score (HMRS), a simple clinical prediction rule based on the patients' age, albumin, creatinine, and the international normalized ratio of the prothrombin time (PT-INR), is correlated with mortality in the cohort of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients. However, in an aging society, an LAVD is indicated for only a small proportion of patients with acute heart failure (AHF), and whether the HMRS has prognostic implications for unselected patients with AHF is unknown. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of HMRS categories on admission in patients with AHF. We analyzed 339 hospitalized patients with AHF who had albumin, creatinine, and the PT-INR recorded on admission. The patients were categorized as follows: the High group (HMRS > 2.48, n = 131), Mid group (HMRS of 1.58-2.48, n = 97) group, and Low group (HMRS < 1.58, n = 111). The endpoints of this study were all-cause death and readmission for heart failure (HF). During a median follow-up of 247 days, 24 (18.3%) patients died in the High group, 7 (7.2%) died in the Mid group, and 8 (7.2%) died in the Low group. In a multivariable analysis adjusted for highly imbalanced baseline variables, a high HMRS was independently associated with survival, with a hazard ratio of 2.90 (95% confidence interval 1.42-5.96, P = 0.004). With regard to the composite endpoint of all-cause death and readmission for HF, the Mid group had a worse prognosis than the Low group, and the High group had the worst prognosis. A high HMRS on admission is associated with all-cause mortality and readmission for HF, and a mid-HMRS is associated with readmission for HF after AHF hospitalization. The HMRS may be a valid clinical tool to stratify the risk of adverse outcomes after hospitalization in unselected patients with AHF.

摘要

心脏伴侣风险评分(HMRS)是一种基于患者年龄、白蛋白、肌酐以及凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值(PT-INR)的简单临床预测规则,与左心室辅助装置(LVAD)接受者队列中的死亡率相关。然而,在老龄化社会中,LVAD仅适用于一小部分急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者,HMRS对未选择的AHF患者是否具有预后意义尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估入院时HMRS类别对AHF患者的预后价值。我们分析了339例住院的AHF患者,这些患者入院时记录了白蛋白、肌酐和PT-INR。患者被分为以下几组:高分组(HMRS>2.48,n = 131)、中分组(HMRS为1.58 - 2.48,n = 97)和低分组(HMRS<1.58,n = 111)。本研究的终点是全因死亡和心力衰竭(HF)再入院。在中位随访247天期间,高分组有24例(18.3%)患者死亡,中分组有7例(7.2%)死亡,低分组有8例(7.2%)死亡。在对高度不平衡的基线变量进行调整的多变量分析中,高HMRS与生存独立相关,风险比为2.90(95%置信区间1.42 - 5.96,P = 0.004)。关于全因死亡和HF再入院的复合终点,中分组的预后比低分组差,高分组的预后最差。入院时高HMRS与全因死亡率和HF再入院相关,中等HMRS与AHF住院后HF再入院相关。HMRS可能是一种有效的临床工具,用于对未选择的AHF患者住院后不良结局风险进行分层。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验