• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续血流左心室辅助装置患者的术前死亡风险评估:HeartMate II风险评分的应用

Pre-operative mortality risk assessment in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: application of the HeartMate II risk score.

作者信息

Thomas Sunu S, Nahumi Nadav, Han Jason, Lippel Matthew, Colombo Paolo, Yuzefpolskaya Melana, Takayama Hiroo, Naka Yoshifumi, Uriel Nir, Jorde Ulrich P

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jul;33(7):675-81. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2014.02.011
PMID:24726424
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Survival with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is dependent on appropriate patient selection. The HeartMate II risk score (HMRS) was recently derived and validated to predict 90-day mortality in clinical trial patients with continuous-flow LVADs. The aim of this study was to test HMRS validity in predicting survival at our institution.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients implanted with HeartMate II (HMII; Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) LVADs from March 31, 2004 to September 20, 2012 at the Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC). Patients were stratified according to HMRS profiles (HMRS Low < 1.58, 1.58 ≤ HMRS Medium ≤ 2.48, HMRS High > 2.48) calculated using age, albumin, creatinine, international normalized ratio (INR) and center volume. Outcome was defined as survival at 90 days after device implantation.

RESULTS

HeartMate II LVADs were implanted in 205 patients. Pre-operative data from 201 patients were categorized into HMRS Low (n = 101; 1.04 [0.64 to 1.31]), HMRS Medium (n = 73; 1.98 [1.78 to 2.25]) and HMRS High (n = 27, 3.07 [2.70 to 3.43]) (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 90 days (HMRS Low 91.0 ± 2.9%, HMRS Medium 91.7 ± 3.2%, HMRS High 88.7 ± 6.1%) and at 1 year (HMRS Low 85.5 ± 3.8%, HMRS Medium 79.3 ± 5.5%, HMRS High 82.4 ± 8.4%) after LVAD implantation were not statistically different (p = 0.43). Prediction of 90-day mortality by receiver operating characteristic was poor (AUC = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

HMRS stratification poorly discriminates 90-day mortality after HMII LVAD implantation at our institution. Its generalizability as a universal prognostic score may be limited.

摘要

背景

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗的生存率取决于合适的患者选择。最近得出并验证了HeartMate II风险评分(HMRS),以预测接受连续血流LVAD治疗的临床试验患者的90天死亡率。本研究的目的是在我们机构测试HMRS在预测生存率方面的有效性。

方法

我们对2004年3月31日至2012年9月20日在哥伦比亚大学医学中心(CUMC)植入HeartMate II(HMII;Thoratec,普莱森顿,加利福尼亚州)LVAD的患者进行了回顾性分析。根据使用年龄、白蛋白、肌酐、国际标准化比值(INR)和中心血量计算出的HMRS概况(HMRS低<1.58,1.58≤HMRS中等≤2.48,HMRS高>2.48)对患者进行分层。结局定义为装置植入后90天的生存率。

结果

205例患者植入了HeartMate II LVAD。201例患者的术前数据被分类为HMRS低(n = 101;1.04[0.64至1.31])、HMRS中等(n = 73;1.98[1.78至2.25])和HMRS高(n = 27,3.07[2.70至3.43])(p<0.0001)。LVAD植入后90天(HMRS低91.0±2.9%,HMRS中等91.7±3.2%,HMRS高88.7±6.1%)和1年(HMRS低85.5±3.8%,HMRS中等79.3±5.5%,HMRS高82.4±8.4%)的Kaplan-Meier生存估计无统计学差异(p = 0.43)。通过受试者工作特征曲线预测90天死亡率的效果较差(AUC = 0.56)。

结论

在我们机构,HMRS分层对HMII LVAD植入后90天死亡率的区分能力较差。其作为通用预后评分的可推广性可能有限。

相似文献

1
Pre-operative mortality risk assessment in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: application of the HeartMate II risk score.持续血流左心室辅助装置患者的术前死亡风险评估:HeartMate II风险评分的应用
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jul;33(7):675-81. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
2
Predicting survival in patients receiving continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: the HeartMate II risk score.预测接受连续血流左心室辅助装置治疗的患者的生存率:HeartMate II 风险评分。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 22;61(3):313-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.055. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
3
The Heartmate Risk Score predicts morbidity and mortality in unselected left ventricular assist device recipients and risk stratifies INTERMACS class 1 patients.Heartmate风险评分可预测未经选择的左心室辅助装置接受者的发病率和死亡率,并对INTERMACS 1级患者进行风险分层。
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Apr;3(4):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.11.005. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
4
Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes.HeartMate II 连续血流左心室辅助装置患者的右心衰竭:发生率、危险因素及对结局的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 May;139(5):1316-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.020. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
5
Predictive Value of EuroSCORE II in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)在接受左心室辅助装置治疗患者中的预测价值
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(6):475-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1565001. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
6
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
7
Risk assessment for continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: does the destination therapy risk score work? An analysis of over 1,000 patients.连续流动左心室辅助装置的风险评估:目标治疗风险评分是否有效?对超过 1000 名患者的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 3;60(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.032. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
8
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy in patients with preoperative hepatic failure: are we pushing the limits too far?术前肝功能衰竭患者的连续流左心室辅助装置治疗:我们是否走得太远了?
Artif Organs. 2015 Apr;39(4):336-42. doi: 10.1111/aor.12375. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
The association of pretransplant HeartMate II left ventricular assist device placement and heart transplantation mortality.移植前HeartMate II左心室辅助装置植入与心脏移植死亡率的关联。
ASAIO J. 2014 May-Jun;60(3):294-9. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000065.
10
Accuracy of Seattle Heart Failure Model and HeartMate II Risk Score in Non-Inotrope-Dependent Advanced Heart Failure Patients: Insights From the ROADMAP Study (Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients).西雅图心力衰竭模型和HeartMate II风险评分在非依赖血管活性药物的晚期心力衰竭患者中的准确性:ROADMAP研究(门诊心力衰竭患者左心室辅助装置与药物治疗的风险评估及比较效果)的见解
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003745.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Value of Bioactive Adrenomedullin and Proenkephalin A in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: An Observational Study.生物活性肾上腺髓质素和前脑啡肽A在左心室辅助装置患者中的临床价值:一项观察性研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 21;14(10):3613. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103613.
2
Improving Outcome Predictions for Patients Receiving Mechanical Circulatory Support by Optimizing Imputation of Missing Values.通过优化缺失值的插补来提高接受机械循环支持的患者的预后预测。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Sep;14(9):e007071. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007071. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
3
Gastrointestinal Bleeding as a Complication in Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
连续流心室辅助装置并发症之胃肠道出血:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Clin Med Res. 2020 Sep;12(9):543-559. doi: 10.14740/jocmr4262. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
4
A Bayesian Model to Predict Survival After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.一种用于预测左心室辅助装置植入后生存率的贝叶斯模型。
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Sep;6(9):771-779. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Red Cell Distribution Width Predicts 90 Day Mortality in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.红细胞分布宽度预测连续血流左心室辅助装置患者 90 天死亡率。
ASAIO J. 2019 Mar/Apr;65(3):233-240. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000803.
6
Predicting Long Term Outcome in Patients Treated With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device: The Penn-Columbia Risk Score.预测接受连续血流左心室辅助装置治疗的患者的长期预后:宾夕法尼亚-哥伦比亚风险评分。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 7;7(6):e006408. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006408.
7
Association of global and disease-specific health status with outcomes following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.全球及特定疾病健康状况与连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术后结局的关联。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0510-9.
8
Low Accuracy of the HeartMate Risk Score for Predicting Mortality Using the INTERMACS Registry Data.使用INTERMACS注册数据时,HeartMate风险评分预测死亡率的准确性较低。
ASAIO J. 2017 May/Jun;63(3):251-256. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000494.
9
Left ventricular assist device patient selection: do risk scores help?左心室辅助装置患者的选择:风险评分有帮助吗?
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2080-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.02.
10
INTERMACS profiles and modifiers: Heterogeneity of patient classification and the impact of modifiers on predicting patient outcome.INTERMACS概况与修正因素:患者分类的异质性及修正因素对预测患者预后的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Apr;35(4):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.10.037. Epub 2015 Nov 6.