State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People's Republic of China.
Key Laboratory of Polar Ecosystem and Climate Change, Ministry of Education, School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, People's Republic of China.
J Microbiol. 2024 Aug;62(8):611-625. doi: 10.1007/s12275-024-00145-w. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
Most microorganisms resist pure cultivation under conventional laboratory conditions. One of the primary issues for this un-culturability is the absence of biologically produced growth-promoting factors in traditionally defined growth media. However, whether cultivating microbes by providing spent culture supernatant of pivotal microbes in the growth medium can be an effective approach to overcome this limitation is still an under-explored area of research. Here, we used the spent culture medium (SCM) method to isolate previously uncultivated marine bacteria and compared the efficiency of this method with the traditional cultivation (TC) method. In the SCM method, Ca. Bathyarchaeia-enriched supernatant (10%) was used along with recalcitrant organic substrates such as lignin, humic acid, and organic carbon mixture. Ca. Bathyarchaeia, a ubiquitous class of archaea, have the capacity to produce metabolites, making their spent culture supernatant a key source to recover new bacterial stains. Both cultivation methods resulted in the recovery of bacterial species from the phyla Pseudomonadota, Bacteroidota, Actinomycetota, and Bacillota. However, our SCM approach also led to the recovery of species from rarely cultivated groups, such as Planctomycetota, Deinococcota, and Balneolota. In terms of the isolation of new taxa, the SCM method resulted in the cultivation of 80 potential new strains, including one at the family, 16 at the genus, and 63 at the species level, with a novelty ratio of ~ 35% (80/219). In contrast, the TC method allowed the isolation of ~ 10% (19/171) novel strains at species level only. These findings suggest that the SCM approach improved the cultivation of novel and diverse bacteria.
大多数微生物在传统的实验室条件下都难以进行纯培养。这些微生物难以培养的主要原因之一是传统定义的生长培养基中缺乏生物产生的促进生长的因子。然而,通过在生长培养基中提供关键微生物的已用培养上清液来培养微生物是否可以成为克服这一限制的有效方法,这仍然是一个研究不足的领域。在这里,我们使用已用培养上清液(SCM)方法来分离以前未培养的海洋细菌,并将这种方法的效率与传统培养(TC)方法进行了比较。在 SCM 方法中,使用富含 Ca. Bathyarchaeia 的上清液(10%)以及木质素、腐殖酸和有机碳混合物等难处理的有机底物。Ca. Bathyarchaeia 是一类普遍存在的古菌,具有产生代谢物的能力,使其已用培养上清液成为回收新细菌菌株的关键来源。两种培养方法都从 Pseudomonadota、Bacteroidota、Actinomycetota 和 Bacillota 门中回收了细菌物种。然而,我们的 SCM 方法还导致了从很少培养的群体(如 Planctomycetota、Deinococcota 和 Balneolota)中回收的物种。就新分类单元的分离而言,SCM 方法培养了 80 种潜在的新菌株,包括 1 个科、16 个属和 63 个种,新颖性比率约为 35%(80/219)。相比之下,TC 方法仅允许在种水平上分离到约 10%(19/171)的新菌株。这些发现表明,SCM 方法提高了新型和多样化细菌的培养效率。