Yeary Karen H Kim, Johnson Detric, Harris Narseary, Yu Han, Saad-Harfouche Frances G, Dauphin Cassy, DiCarlo Elizabeth, Flores Tessa, Yao Song, Varady Krista, Tang Li
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2025 Feb;125(2):172-187.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2024.07.003. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
Intensive lifestyle interventions, including modest reductions in daily caloric intake (ie, continuous calorie energy reduction [CER]), are recommended by US national professional health organizations (eg, American Heart Association). However, they are less effective in Black communities. A burgeoning literature has reported the promise of intermittent fasting (IF) as an alternative strategy for weight loss. However, IF studies have been conducted with White participants predominately and provided participant resources not readily available in real-world situations.
Weight-loss and weight-related outcomes of a scalable (ie, able to be widely disseminated and implemented) IF intervention developed with and for Black adults were compared with a CER intervention for the purpose of determining IF's feasibility (ie, initial effectiveness, adherence, and acceptance) in a Black community.
A cluster randomized controlled pilot study was conducted.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: A total of 42 Black adults with a body mass index (calculated as kg / m) ≥25 were recruited from 5 Black churches (3 IF and 2 CER) in Western New York State from September 2021 to May 2022. Participants were free of medical conditions that might have contraindicated participation in a weight-reduction program and other factors that might affect weight loss.
Community health workers delivered the 6-month, 16-session, faith-based IF and CER interventions.
The primary outcome was feasibility, consisting of initial effectiveness on body weight (ie, percent body weight lost from baseline to 6-month follow-up), adherence, and acceptability.
Descriptive statistics and linear mixed models accounting for within-church clustering were used. A baseline covariate corresponding to the outcome variable was included in the model. Intent-to-treat analysis was used.
There was statistically significant weight loss within both arms (IF: -3.5 kg; 95% CI -6 to -0.9 kg, CER: -2.9 kg; 95% CI -5.1 to -0.8 kg) from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Compared with CER, IF led to significantly lower daily energy intake (414.2 kcal; 95% CI 55.2 to 773.2 kcal) and fat intake (16.1 g; 95% CI 2.4 to 29.8 g). IF may result in lower fruit and vegetable intake (-103.2 g; 95% CI -200.9 to -5.5 g) and fiber intake -5.4 g; 95% CI -8.7 to -2 g) compared with CER. Participants in the IF arm completed a mean (SE) of 3.8 (1.4) more self-monitoring booklets compared with those in the CER arm (P = .02). Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the program.
An IF intervention developed with and for Black adults can be feasibly implemented in Black churches. Larger studies need to be conducted to ascertain the extent IF can serve as a viable weight-loss alternative to CER interventions in Black communities.
美国国家专业健康组织(如美国心脏协会)推荐强化生活方式干预,包括适度减少每日热量摄入(即持续热量减少[CER])。然而,这些干预措施在黑人社区的效果较差。新兴文献报道了间歇性禁食(IF)作为一种减肥替代策略的前景。然而,IF研究主要是在白人参与者中进行的,并且提供了现实世界中不易获得的参与者资源。
将为黑人成年人开发并针对他们的可扩展(即能够广泛传播和实施)IF干预措施的减肥及体重相关结果,与CER干预措施进行比较,以确定IF在黑人社区中的可行性(即初始有效性、依从性和可接受性)。
进行了一项整群随机对照试验性研究。
参与者/地点:2021年9月至2022年5月,从纽约州西部的5所黑人教堂(3所IF和2所CER)招募了42名体重指数(以千克/米计算)≥25的黑人成年人。参与者没有可能禁忌参与减肥计划的医疗状况以及其他可能影响体重减轻的因素。
社区卫生工作者提供为期6个月、共16节基于信仰的IF和CER干预措施。
主要结局是可行性,包括对体重的初始有效性(即从基线到6个月随访时体重减轻的百分比)、依从性和可接受性。
使用描述性统计和考虑教堂内部聚类的线性混合模型。模型中纳入了与结局变量对应的基线协变量。采用意向性分析。
从基线到6个月随访时,两组均有统计学意义的体重减轻(IF组:-3.5千克;95%CI -6至-0.9千克,CER组:-2.9千克;95%CI -5.1至-0.8千克)。与CER相比,IF导致每日能量摄入显著降低(414.2千卡;95%CI 55.2至773.2千卡)和脂肪摄入显著降低(16.1克;CI 2.4至29.8克)。与CER相比,IF可能导致水果和蔬菜摄入量降低(-103.2克;95%CI -200.9至-5.5克)和纤维摄入量降低(-5.4克;95%CI -8.7至-2克)。与CER组相比,IF组参与者完成的自我监测手册平均(SE)多3.8(1.4)本(P = 0.02)。参与者对该计划的满意度很高。
为黑人成年人开发并针对他们的IF干预措施可以在黑人教堂中切实可行地实施。需要进行更大规模的研究,以确定IF在多大程度上可以作为黑人社区中CER干预措施的可行减肥替代方案。