• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹股沟区淋巴结清扫术的并发症和不良事件:全球专家共识。

Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus.

机构信息

Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Department of Surgery, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2024 Jul 2;8(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056
PMID:38987232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11236483/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inguinal lymph node dissection plays an important role in the management of melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. Inguinal lymph node dissection is associated with various intraoperative and postoperative complications with significant heterogeneity in classification and reporting. This lack of standardization challenges efforts to study and report inguinal lymph node dissection outcomes. The aim of this study was to devise a system to standardize the classification and reporting of inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications by creating a worldwide collaborative, the complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area (CALI) group.

METHODS

A modified 3-round Delphi consensus approach surveyed a worldwide group of experts in inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. The group of experts included general surgeons, urologists and oncologists (gynaecological and surgical). The survey assessed expert agreement on inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications. Panel interrater agreement and consistency were assessed as the overall percentage agreement and Cronbach's α.

RESULTS

Forty-seven experienced consultants were enrolled: 26 (55.3%) urologists, 11 (23.4%) surgical oncologists, 6 (12.8%) general surgeons and 4 (8.5%) gynaecology oncologists. Based on their expertise, 31 (66%), 10 (21.3%) and 22 (46.8%) of the participants treat penile cancer, vulval cancer and melanoma using inguinal lymph node dissection respectively; 89.4% (42 of 47) agreed with the definitions and inclusion as part of the inguinal lymph node dissection intraoperative complication group, while 93.6% (44 of 47) agreed that postoperative complications should be subclassified into five macrocategories. Unanimous agreement (100%, 37 of 37) was achieved with the final standardized classification system for reporting inguinal lymph node dissection complications in melanoma, vulval cancer and penile cancer.

CONCLUSION

The complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area classification system has been developed as a tool to standardize the assessment and reporting of complications during inguinal lymph node dissection for the treatment of melanoma, vulval and penile cancer.

摘要

背景

腹股沟淋巴结清扫术在黑色素瘤、阴茎和外阴癌的治疗中起着重要作用。腹股沟淋巴结清扫术与各种术中及术后并发症相关,其分类和报告存在显著的异质性。这种缺乏标准化的情况给研究和报告腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的结果带来了挑战。本研究的目的是通过建立一个全球性的合作组织——腹股沟区域淋巴结清扫术并发症和不良事件(CALI)小组,制定一个系统来规范腹股沟淋巴结清扫术围手术期并发症的分类和报告。

方法

采用改良的 3 轮 Delphi 共识方法,对黑色素瘤、阴茎和外阴癌的腹股沟淋巴结清扫术专家进行了全球调查。该专家组包括普通外科医生、泌尿科医生和肿瘤学家(妇科和外科)。该调查评估了专家对腹股沟淋巴结清扫术围手术期并发症的共识程度。通过总体百分比一致率和 Cronbach's α 评估小组内评分者间的一致性和一致性。

结果

共纳入 47 名经验丰富的顾问:26 名(55.3%)泌尿科医生、11 名(23.4%)外科肿瘤学家、6 名(12.8%)普通外科医生和 4 名(8.5%)妇科肿瘤学家。根据他们的专业知识,31 名(66%)、10 名(21.3%)和 22 名(46.8%)参与者分别采用腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗阴茎癌、外阴癌和黑色素瘤;89.4%(42/47)同意将定义和纳入作为腹股沟淋巴结清扫术术中并发症组的一部分,而 93.6%(44/47)同意将术后并发症分为五个宏观类别。最终标准化的报告黑色素瘤、外阴癌和阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术并发症的分类系统得到了一致同意(100%,37/37)。

结论

腹股沟淋巴结清扫术并发症和不良事件分类系统已被开发为一种工具,用于规范腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗黑色素瘤、外阴和阴茎癌的并发症评估和报告。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e4/11236483/9f0b5601025b/zrae056f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e4/11236483/429086868993/zrae056f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e4/11236483/e6b147173d90/zrae056f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e4/11236483/3b54e1938718/zrae056f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e4/11236483/9f0b5601025b/zrae056f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e4/11236483/429086868993/zrae056f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e4/11236483/e6b147173d90/zrae056f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e4/11236483/3b54e1938718/zrae056f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e4/11236483/9f0b5601025b/zrae056f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus.腹股沟区淋巴结清扫术的并发症和不良事件:全球专家共识。
BJS Open. 2024 Jul 2;8(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056.
2
Assessment and Reporting of Perioperative Adverse Events and Complications in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Melanoma, Vulvar Cancer, and Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.黑色素瘤、外阴癌和阴茎癌患者腹股沟淋巴结清扫围手术期不良事件和并发症的评估与报告:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2023 Apr;47(4):962-974. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06882-6. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
3
Robot-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy to treat penile and vulvar cancers: a scoping review.机器人辅助腹股沟淋巴结切除术治疗阴茎和外阴癌:范围综述。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jun;76(3):278-285. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05532-0.
4
Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients?对于阴茎癌患者,视频内镜下腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的发病率会低于开放性淋巴结清扫术吗?
J Endourol. 2008 Aug;22(8):1687-91. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0386.
5
Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.阴茎癌手术治疗中的淋巴结清扫术。
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1075-88. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.021. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
6
Differences in Survival Associated with Performance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Penile Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.生存差异与浸润性阴茎癌患者淋巴结清扫术的相关性:来自国家癌症数据库的研究结果。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1238-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.121. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
7
Feasibility, complications and oncologic results of a limited inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of penile cancer.阴茎癌治疗中腹股沟淋巴结有限清扫术的可行性、并发症及肿瘤学结果
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 May-Jun;41(3):486-95. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0304.
8
Wound Complication Rates after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Contemporary Analysis of the NSQIP Database.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后的伤口并发症发生率:NSQIP 数据库的当代分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Jan 1;236(1):18-25. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000438. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
9
Current practice patterns of society of urologic oncology members in performing inguinal lymph node staging/therapy for penile cancer: A survey study.当前泌尿肿瘤学会成员在阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结分期/治疗方面的实践模式:一项调查研究。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Jul;39(7):439.e9-439.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
[Surgical technique and postoperative morbidity following radical inguinal/iliacal lymph node dissection--a prospective study in 67 patients with malignant melanoma metastatic to the groin].[根治性腹股沟/髂淋巴结清扫术后的手术技术及术后发病率——对67例腹股沟转移性恶性黑色素瘤患者的前瞻性研究]
Zentralbl Chir. 2009 Sep;134(5):437-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224608. Epub 2009 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Early and Late Complications Associated with Penile Cancer Surgery and the Impact of Human Papillomavirus Status: Findings from a Retrospective Norwegian Cohort Study.阴茎癌手术相关的早期和晚期并发症以及人乳头瘤病毒状态的影响:一项挪威回顾性队列研究的结果
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Feb 8;72:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.009. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Role of Age, Comorbidity, and Frailty in the Prediction of Postoperative Complications After Surgery for Vulvar Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with the Development of a Nomogram.年龄、合并症和衰弱在外阴癌手术后并发症预测中的作用:一项开发列线图的回顾性队列研究
Curr Oncol. 2024 Dec 31;32(1):21. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32010021.
3

本文引用的文献

1
ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi.ACCORD(准确共识报告文件):通过改良 Delphi 法制定的生物医学共识方法报告指南。
PLoS Med. 2024 Jan 23;21(1):e1004326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004326. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Severity Grading Systems for Intraoperative Adverse Events. A Systematic Review of the Literature and Citation Analysis.术中不良事件严重程度分级系统。文献系统评价和引文分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):e973-e980. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005883. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
3
Bibliometric analysis of academic journal recommendations and requirements for surgical and anesthesiologic adverse events reporting.
A Review of the Literature on Videoscopic and Robotic Inguinal-Iliac-Obturator Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma.
皮肤黑色素瘤患者视频镜检及机器人腹股沟-髂-闭孔淋巴结清扫术的文献综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 1;13(23):7305. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237305.
学术期刊推荐的文献计量分析和手术及麻醉不良事件报告的要求。
Int J Surg. 2023 May 1;109(5):1489-1496. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000323.
4
Recommendations for Intraoperative Adverse Events Data Collection in Clinical Studies and Study Protocols. An ICARUS Global Surgical Collaboration Study.临床研究和研究方案中术中不良事件数据收集的建议。一项伊卡洛斯全球外科合作研究。
Int J Surg Protoc. 2023 Feb 9;27(1):23-83. doi: 10.29337/ijsp.183. eCollection 2023.
5
Assessment and Reporting of Perioperative Adverse Events and Complications in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Melanoma, Vulvar Cancer, and Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.黑色素瘤、外阴癌和阴茎癌患者腹股沟淋巴结清扫围手术期不良事件和并发症的评估与报告:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2023 Apr;47(4):962-974. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06882-6. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
6
The agreement between three classification systems used to grade the severity of lymphedema in patients with upper and lower extremity lymphedema: A retrospective study.三种分类系统评估上肢和下肢淋巴水肿患者严重程度的一致性:一项回顾性研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Apr;40(4):874-879. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2161080. Epub 2022 Dec 25.
7
Wound Complication Rates after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Contemporary Analysis of the NSQIP Database.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后的伤口并发症发生率:NSQIP 数据库的当代分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Jan 1;236(1):18-25. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000438. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
8
Imaging of the Lymphatic Vessels for Surgical Planning: A Systematic Review.淋巴血管成像在手术规划中的应用:系统评价。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan;30(1):462-479. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12552-7. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
9
Strategies for Improving the Standardization of Perioperative Adverse Events in Surgery and Anesthesiology: "The Long Road from Assessment to Collection, Grading and Reporting".提高手术和麻醉围手术期不良事件标准化的策略:“从评估到收集、分级和报告的漫长道路”
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 30;11(17):5115. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175115.
10
If You Know Them, You Avoid Them: The Imperative Need to Improve the Narrative Regarding Perioperative Adverse Events.如果你了解它们,你就会避开它们:迫切需要改进围手术期不良事件的叙述。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 25;11(17):4978. doi: 10.3390/jcm11174978.