Jensen Sofie Sajan, Deding Ulrik, Hansen Lea Østergaard, Koulaouzidis Anastasios, Bjørsum-Meyer Thomas
Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Jul 10;12(7):E887-E894. doi: 10.1055/a-2335-8290. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Quality of bowel preparation and successful transit are critical factors for complete small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to assess the impact of chewing gum as part of the bowel preparation regimen on the completion rate in both SBCE and CCE. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase. Data were extracted upon quality assessment of included studies. Two reviewers conducted the screening process according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Eighty-four studies met the search criteria and four randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, these were assessed for bias using Minors. Pooled completion rate of SBCE studies was defined as the primary outcome. Three randomized controlled trials were SBCE studies and one was a CCE study. The pooled completion rate (91%) was not significantly higher in SBCE patients who were given chewing gum after capsule ingestion compared to those who were not (85%). Variance information was not reported in all studies, and therefore, pooled transit time estimates could not be calculated. Chewing gum has a good safety profile but has only been used as a booster in one CCE study and a few SBCE studies. More prospective randomized controlled trials, therefore, are needed to investigate the efficacy of chewing gum for achieving complete capsule examination.
肠道准备质量和成功通过是完整小肠胶囊内镜检查(SBCE)和结肠胶囊内镜检查(CCE)的关键因素。本系统评价及荟萃分析的目的是评估将口香糖作为肠道准备方案的一部分对SBCE和CCE完成率的影响。在PubMed、Cochrane、科学网和Embase中进行了系统的文献检索。根据纳入研究的质量评估提取数据。两名评价者根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行筛选过程。84项研究符合检索标准,4项随机对照试验纳入荟萃分析,使用Minors对这些试验进行偏倚评估。SBCE研究的合并完成率被定义为主要结局。3项随机对照试验为SBCE研究,1项为CCE研究。与未服用口香糖的SBCE患者(85%)相比,胶囊摄入后服用口香糖的患者合并完成率(91%)并无显著更高。并非所有研究都报告了方差信息,因此无法计算合并通过时间估计值。口香糖具有良好的安全性,但仅在1项CCE研究和少数SBCE研究中用作辅助手段。因此,需要更多前瞻性随机对照试验来研究口香糖对实现完整胶囊检查的疗效。