Suppr超能文献

促动力药物是否会影响小肠胶囊内镜的完成率?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Do prokinetics influence the completion rate in small-bowel capsule endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Centre for Liver & Digestive Disorders, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Sep;29(9):1171-85. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.818532. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of purging for bowel cleansing prior to small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has now been established in clinical practice. Despite that, the number of incomplete SBCEs is still around 15-20%. To date, the use of prokinetics in SBCE - aiming to improve completion rate (CR) - remains a contentious issue resulting in lack of consensus among capsule experts.

METHODS

Extensive medical literature searches were conducted (to November 2012), using suitable MeSH terms and keywords, in search of studies that compared capsule ingestion with prokinetic agents vs. controls or placebo. We examined the effects of prokinetic administration on SBCE CR (primary end point), as well as on the following secondary end points: diagnostic yield (DY), gastric transit time (GTT) and small-bowel transit time (SBTT) by meta-analysis of all relevant studies.

RESULTS

A total of 17 eligible studies (14 prospective, 3 retrospective) were identified, including 1028 individuals who ingested the capsule with no prokinetic vs. 876 who received a prokinetic. Overall, there was a higher CR in patients who ingested the capsule with prokinetics vs. controls (OR [95% CI]: 1.96 [1.38-2.78]). Of the two most readily available prokinetics, metoclopramide was associated with superior SBCE CR vs. control (OR [95% CI]: 2.8 [1.35-3.21]), while erythromycin showed no benefit (OR [95% CI]: 1.36 [0.61-3.03]). Where prokinetics were used alone, neither metoclopramide nor erythromycin showed any benefit on CR. There was no benefit of prokinetics (over controls) on DY. However, metoclopramide had a significant effect on GTT and SBTT.

LIMITATIONS

The majority of the included studies were heterogeneous, and the effect of prokinetics on image quality and mucosal visualization was not examined.

CONCLUSION

Our pooled data shows that the use of prokinetics for capsule ingestion improves CR in SBCE. This effect appears to be particularly evident with metoclopramide, when used concurrently with purging and/or use of real-time monitoring. In a small number of studies, erythromycin showed - through its gastrokinetic effect - marginal benefit. No prokinetic has a beneficial effect on SBCE DY.

摘要

背景

在小肠胶囊内镜(SBCE)检查前,使用灌洗进行肠道清洁已在临床实践中得到确立。尽管如此,仍有 15-20%的 SBCE 检查结果不完全。迄今为止,在 SBCE 中使用促动力药物(旨在提高完成率(CR))仍然是一个有争议的问题,导致胶囊专家之间缺乏共识。

方法

我们进行了广泛的医学文献检索(截至 2012 年 11 月),使用了合适的 MeSH 术语和关键词,以搜索比较胶囊摄入与促动力药物与对照组或安慰剂的研究。我们通过对所有相关研究进行荟萃分析,检查了促动力药物给药对 SBCE CR(主要终点)以及以下次要终点的影响:诊断产量(DY)、胃转运时间(GTT)和小肠转运时间(SBTT)。

结果

共确定了 17 项符合条件的研究(14 项前瞻性研究,3 项回顾性研究),其中 1028 名患者摄入了胶囊且未使用促动力药物,876 名患者使用了促动力药物。总体而言,与对照组相比,摄入胶囊并使用促动力药物的患者 CR 更高(OR[95%CI]:1.96[1.38-2.78])。在两种最容易获得的促动力药物中,甲氧氯普胺与 SBCE CR 优于对照组(OR[95%CI]:2.8[1.35-3.21]),而红霉素则没有益处(OR[95%CI]:1.36[0.61-3.03])。当单独使用促动力药物时,甲氧氯普胺和红霉素对 CR 均无益处。促动力药物(与对照组相比)对 DY 没有益处。然而,甲氧氯普胺对 GTT 和 SBTT 有显著影响。

局限性

大多数纳入的研究存在异质性,且促动力药物对图像质量和黏膜可视化的影响未进行检查。

结论

我们的汇总数据表明,在 SBCE 中,使用促动力药物进行胶囊摄入可提高 CR。这种效果似乎在用甲氧氯普胺时特别明显,特别是在同时进行灌洗和/或使用实时监测时。在少数研究中,红霉素通过其胃动力作用显示出一定的益处。没有促动力药物对 SBCE DY 有有益的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验