The University of Texas Rio Grande, Division of Primary Care & Preventive Medicine.
National Register of Health Service Psychologists.
Fam Syst Health. 2024 Jun;42(2):292-297. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000898.
The authors want to invite the integrated care community to reflect with us on an evolutionary shift in how we approach matters of justice and equity: from a diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) framework to a perspective that centers the relational concepts of belonging, dignity, and justice (BDJ) for a more just world (Davis, 2021). Our desire to reflect, question, and pivot is inspired by the Ecocycle Planning Model-which I (Deepu George) used to critically frame the Collaborative Family Healthcare Association's (CFHA) history in Part I of the article (George, 2023a) and creatively anticipate our future in Part II (George & Khatri, 2024). In this article, the authors want to focus on the nodes of maturity and creative destruction, as well as the idea of the rigidity trap-to examine our collective energies around the idea of DEI. With CFHA's 30th anniversary upon us, we pause and reflect on not only the benefits of DEI efforts heretofore, but also the pitfalls, to avoid the rigidity trap, which is likely to occur when we embrace tenets of an idea that may no longer serve the values we once aspired to or fail to evolve in favor of the familiar. Considering critiques of the limitations of DEI work in practice and literature, the authors believe a BDJ approach will better inform our growth moving forward. Therefore, the authors want to reflect, honor, and build upon the impact and gains from DEI and adapt them to better serve the needs of all-especially the historically marginalized and underrepresented voices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
从多样性、公平性和包容性（DEI）框架转向以归属感、尊严和正义（BDJ）为中心的观点，以创造一个更加公正的世界（戴维斯，2021）。我们之所以想要反思、质疑和转变，是受到生态循环规划模型的启发——我（迪普·乔治）在文章的第一部分（乔治，2023a）中使用该模型批判性地构建了协作家庭医疗保健协会（CFHA）的历史，并在第二部分（乔治和卡特里，2024）中创造性地预测了我们的未来。在本文中，作者希望关注成熟和创造性破坏的节点，以及僵化陷阱的概念，以审视我们在 DEI 理念周围的集体能量。随着 CFHA 成立 30 周年的到来，我们暂停并反思迄今为止 DEI 努力的好处，以及避免僵化陷阱的陷阱，当我们接受可能不再服务于我们曾经渴望的价值观或未能为熟悉的事物进化的理念时，就可能会陷入僵化陷阱。考虑到对 DEI 工作在实践和文献中的局限性的批评，作者认为 BDJ 方法将更好地指导我们未来的发展。因此，作者希望反思、尊重和借鉴 DEI 的影响和收益，并对其进行调整，以更好地满足所有人的需求，尤其是历史上被边缘化和代表性不足的声音的需求。（PsycInfo 数据库记录（c）2024 APA，保留所有权利）。
