Post Graduation Program in Health Sciences (PPGCS), Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (UESC), Ilhéus, BA, Brazil; Grupo de Estudos em Psicofisiologia do Esforço Físico (GEPEF), Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil.
Grupo de Estudos em Psicofisiologia do Esforço Físico (GEPEF), Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2024 Oct;168:107114. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107114. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
OBJECTIVE: To synthesise the literature examining the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and cortisol responses to an acute stressor following total sleep deprivation (TSD) in healthy adult subjects. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review (CRD42022293857) following the latest PRISMA statement. We searched Medline (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), PsycINFO (via Ovid), CINAHL complete and Scopus databases, without year restriction, using search terms related to "sleep deprivation", "stress", "autonomic nervous system" and "cortisol". Two independent team members used pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria to assess eligibility and extract data. We used RoB 2 to assess the risk of bias in randomised controlled trials, and ROBINS-I for non-randomised studies. RESULTS: Sixteen studies, with 581 participants (mean age = 29 ± 12 years), were eligible for inclusion in the descriptive syntheses. Half of the studies (n = 8) were conducted in the United States of America. The most commonly used study designs were randomised crossover studies (n = 7) and randomised controlled trials (n = 5). Most studies used a single night of TSD (n = 13) which was followed by a psychological (n = 6), physical (n = 5) or psychological and physical (n = 5) acute stressor event. Heart rate (n = 8), cortisol (n = 7) and blood pressure (n =6) were the most reported outcomes, while only a single study used forearm vascular conductance and forearm blood flow. Ten studies found that TSD changed, at least, one marker of ANS or cortisol response. TSD compared with a sleep control condition increased cortisol level (n=1), systolic blood pressure (n=3), diastolic blood pressure (n=2), mean arterial pressure (n=1), and electrodermal activity (n=1) after acute stress. Also, compared with a sleep control, TSD blunted cortisol (n=2), heart rate (n=1) and systolic blood pressure (n=2) responses after acute stress. However, TSD did not change ANS or cortisol responses to acute stressors in 73 % of the total reported outcomes. Furthermore, 10 RCT studies (62.5 %) were assigned as "some concerns" and two RCT studies (12.5 %) were attributed "high" risk of bias. Additionally, one non-randomised trial was classified as "moderate" and three non-randomised trials as "serious" risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The markers of ANS and cortisol responses to acute stress after TSD in healthy individuals reveal a scarcity of consistent evidence. The included studies present enough evidence that TSD induces either blunted or exaggerated ANS or cortisol responses to laboratory stresses supporting the "bidirectional multi-system reactivity hypothesis.". It appears that a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon still lacks robust evidence, and further research is needed to clarify these relationships.
目的:综合研究健康成年人在完全睡眠剥夺(TSD)后对急性应激源的自主神经系统(ANS)和皮质醇反应。
方法:我们按照最新的 PRISMA 声明进行了系统评价(CRD42022293857)。我们在 Medline(通过 Ovid)、Embase(通过 Ovid)、PsycINFO(通过 Ovid)、CINAHL 完整和 Scopus 数据库中进行了无年限限制的搜索,使用与“睡眠剥夺”、“应激”、“自主神经系统”和“皮质醇”相关的搜索词。两名独立的团队成员使用预先定义的纳入/排除标准来评估合格性并提取数据。我们使用 RoB 2 评估随机对照试验的偏倚风险,使用 ROBINS-I 评估非随机研究。
结果:有 16 项研究,共 581 名参与者(平均年龄=29±12 岁)符合纳入描述性综合分析的标准。一半的研究(n=8)在美国进行。最常用的研究设计是随机交叉研究(n=7)和随机对照试验(n=5)。大多数研究使用了一个晚上的 TSD(n=13),随后是心理(n=6)、身体(n=5)或心理和身体(n=5)急性应激源事件。心率(n=8)、皮质醇(n=7)和血压(n=6)是报告最多的结果,而只有一项研究使用了前臂血管传导和前臂血流量。10 项研究发现,TSD 至少改变了自主神经系统或皮质醇反应的一个标志物。与睡眠对照组相比,TSD 增加了皮质醇水平(n=1)、收缩压(n=3)、舒张压(n=2)、平均动脉压(n=1)和皮肤电活动(n=1),在急性应激后。此外,与睡眠对照组相比,TSD 减弱了皮质醇(n=2)、心率(n=1)和收缩压(n=2)对急性应激的反应。然而,TSD 并没有改变 73%的总报告结果中对急性应激源的自主神经系统或皮质醇反应。此外,10 项 RCT 研究(62.5%)被评为“存在一些问题”,两项 RCT 研究(12.5%)被评为“高”偏倚风险。此外,一项非随机试验被归类为“中度”,三项非随机试验被归类为“严重”偏倚风险。
结论:健康个体在 TSD 后对急性应激的自主神经系统和皮质醇反应的标志物显示出一致证据的缺乏。纳入的研究提供了足够的证据,TSD 诱导了对实验室应激的自主神经系统或皮质醇反应的迟钝或夸大,支持“双向多系统反应性假说”。似乎对这种现象的全面理解仍然缺乏有力的证据,需要进一步的研究来阐明这些关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-31
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-8-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-1-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-6-14
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2025-8-30
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2025-5-1