• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者个性化血糖管理

[Personalized glycemic management for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis based on machine learning].

作者信息

Wang Ruirui, Wu Lijuan, Li Huixian, Li Xin

机构信息

Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Institute of Sciences in Emergency Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Jun;36(6):635-642. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240130-00096.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240130-00096
PMID:38991964
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the optimal blood glucose-lowering strategies for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) to enhance personalized treatment effects using machine learning techniques based on the United States Critical Care Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care- IV (MIMIC- IV).

METHODS

Utilizing the MIMIC- IV database, the case data of 2 096 patients with DKA admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2008 to 2019 were analyzed. Machine learning models were developed, and receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) and precision-recall curve (PR curve) were plotted to evaluate the model's effectiveness in predicting four common adverse outcomes: hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, reductions in Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and extended hospital stays. The risk of adverse outcomes was analyzed in relation to the rate of blood glucose decrease. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between relevant factors and the risk of hypokalemia. Personalized risk interpretation methods and predictive technologies were applied to individualize the analysis of optimal glucose control ranges for patients.

RESULTS

The machine learning models demonstrated excellent performance in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with DKA, with areas under the ROC curve (AUROC) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for predicting hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, GCS score reduction, and extended hospital stays being 0.826 (0.803-0.849), 0.850 (0.828-0.870), 0.925 (0.903-0.946), and 0.901 (0.883-0.920), respectively. Analysis of the relationship between the rate of blood glucose reduction and the risk of four adverse outcomes showed that a maximum glucose reduction rate > 6.26 mmol×L×h significantly increased the risk of hypoglycemia (P < 0.001); a rate > 2.72 mmol×L×h significantly elevated the risk of hypokalemia (P < 0.001); a rate > 5.53 mmol×L×h significantly reduced the risk of GCS score reduction (P < 0.001); and a rate > 8.03 mmol×L×h significantly shortened the length of hospital stay (P < 0.001). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated significant correlations between maximum bicarbonate levels, blood urea nitrogen levels, and total insulin doses with the risk of hypokalemia (all P < 0.01). In terms of establishing personalized optimal treatment thresholds, assuming optimal glucose reduction thresholds for hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, GCS score reduction, and extended hospital stay were x, x, x, x, respectively, the recommended glucose reduction rates to minimize the risks of hypokalemia and hypoglycemia should be ≤min{x, x}, while those to reduce GCS score decline and extended hospital stay should be ≥ max{x, x}. When these ranges overlap, i.e., max{x, x} ≤ min{x, x}, this interval was the recommended optimal glucose reduction range. If there was no overlap between these ranges, i.e., max{x, x} > min{x, x}, the treatment strategy should be dynamically adjusted considering individual differences in the risk of various adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The machine learning models shows good performance in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with DKA, assisting in personalized blood glucose management and holding important clinical application prospects.

摘要

目的

利用基于美国重症监护医学信息集市-重症监护IV(MIMIC-IV)的机器学习技术,探索糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)患者的最佳降糖策略,以提高个性化治疗效果。

方法

利用MIMIC-IV数据库,分析了2008年至2019年在贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心重症监护病房(ICU)收治的2096例DKA患者的病例数据。开发机器学习模型,并绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)和精确召回率曲线(PR曲线),以评估模型预测四种常见不良结局的有效性:低血糖、低钾血症、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分降低和住院时间延长。分析血糖下降速率与不良结局风险之间的关系。进行单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析,以检验相关因素与低钾血症风险之间的关系。应用个性化风险解读方法和预测技术,对患者的最佳血糖控制范围进行个体化分析。

结果

机器学习模型在预测DKA患者不良结局方面表现出色,预测低血糖、低钾血症、GCS评分降低和住院时间延长的ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)及95%置信区间(95%CI)分别为0.826(0.803-0.849)、0.850(0.828-0.870)、0.925(0.903-0.946)和0.901(0.883-0.920)。血糖下降速率与四种不良结局风险之间的关系分析表明,最大血糖下降速率>6.26 mmol·L·h显著增加低血糖风险(P<0.001);速率>2.72 mmol·L·h显著增加低钾血症风险(P<0.001);速率>5.53 mmol·L·h显著降低GCS评分降低风险(P<0.001);速率>8.03 mmol·L·h显著缩短住院时间(P<0.001)。多因素Logistic回归分析表明,最大碳酸氢盐水平、血尿素氮水平和总胰岛素剂量与低钾血症风险显著相关(均P<0.01)。在建立个性化最佳治疗阈值方面,假设低血糖、低钾血症、GCS评分降低和住院时间延长的最佳血糖降低阈值分别为x、x、x、x,则为使低钾血症和低血糖风险最小化,推荐的血糖降低速率应≤min{x,x},而减少GCS评分下降和住院时间延长的速率应≥max{x,x}。当这些范围重叠时,即max{x,x}≤min{x,x},此区间为推荐的最佳血糖降低范围。如果这些范围没有重叠,即max{x,x}>min{x,x},则应考虑各种不良结局风险的个体差异动态调整治疗策略。

结论

机器学习模型在预测DKA患者不良结局方面表现良好,有助于个性化血糖管理,具有重要的临床应用前景。

相似文献

1
[Personalized glycemic management for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis based on machine learning].基于机器学习的糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者个性化血糖管理
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Jun;36(6):635-642. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240130-00096.
2
Machine learning prediction models and nomogram to predict the risk of in-hospital death for severe DKA: A clinical study based on MIMIC-IV, eICU databases, and a college hospital ICU.基于 MIMIC-IV、eICU 数据库和一家大学医院 ICU 的临床研究:机器学习预测模型和诺莫图预测严重 DKA 患者院内死亡风险
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Jun;174:105049. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105049. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
Clinical nomogram prediction model to assess the risk of prolonged ICU length of stay in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a retrospective analysis based on the MIMIC-IV database.基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性分析:用于评估糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者 ICU 住院时间延长风险的临床列线图预测模型。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02467-z.
4
[Construction of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in intensive care unit based on machine learning].基于机器学习构建重症监护病房脓毒症患者院内死亡率预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Jul;35(7):696-701. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221219-01104.
5
Nomogram to predict the risk of acute kidney injury in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: an analysis of the MIMIC-III database.预测糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者急性肾损伤风险的列线图:对 MIMIC-III 数据库的分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Mar 4;21(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00696-8.
6
[Risk factors for death and their predictive value on diabetic kidney disease patients in intensive care unit based on MIMIC-III database].基于MIMIC-III数据库的重症监护病房糖尿病肾病患者死亡危险因素及其预测价值
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Sep;32(9):1085-1090. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200714-00522.
7
The Impact of a New Best Practice Advisory on the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.新最佳实践建议对糖尿病酮症酸中毒管理的影响。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2021;17(5):e110320187540. doi: 10.2174/1573399816999201103141726.
8
Predictors of Short Intensive Care Unit Stay for Patients with Diabetic Ketoacidosis Using a Novel Emergency Department-Based Resuscitation and Critical Care Unit.使用新型基于急诊科的复苏和重症监护病房对糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者短期入住重症监护病房的预测因素。
J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;56(2):127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.09.048. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
9
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
10
Predicting the Risk of Inpatient Hypoglycemia With Machine Learning Using Electronic Health Records.使用电子健康记录通过机器学习预测住院患者低血糖风险。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1504-1511. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1743. Epub 2020 Apr 29.