Rajalingam Rajesh, Rammohan Ashwin, Kumar Shanmugam Arul, Cherukuru Ramkiran, Uday Utpala, Palaniappan Kumar, Kanagavelu Rathnavelu, Balasubramanian Balaji, Narasimhan Gomathy, Rela Mohamed
The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India.
The Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai, India.
Am J Transplant. 2025 Jan;25(1):164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.003. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
One of the concerns specific to minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH) is the prolonged time required for graft extraction after completion of the donor hepatectomy (donor warm ischemia time [DWIT]). There has never been an objective evaluation of minimally invasive donor hepatectomy-DWIT on allograft function in living donor liver transplantation. We evaluated the effect of DWIT following robotic donor hepatectomy (RDH) on recipient outcomes and compared them with a matched cohort of open donor hepatectomy (ODH). Demographic, perioperative, and recipient's postoperative outcome data for all right lobe (RL)-RDH performed between September 2019 and July 2023 were analyzed and compared with a propensity score matched cohort (1:1) of RL-ODH from the same time period. Of a total of 103 RL-RDH and 446 RL-ODH, unmatched and propensity score matched analysis (1:1) revealed a significantly longer DWIT in the RDH group as compared to the ODH group (9.33 ± 3.95 vs 2.87 ± 2.13, P < .0001). This did not translate into any difference in the rates of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), biliary complications, major morbidity, or overall 1-and 3-month survival. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis threshold for DWIT-early allograft dysfunction was 9 minutes (area under receiver operating characteristic: 0.67, sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 53.8%). We show that prolonged DWIT within an acceptable range in RDH does not have deleterious effects on short-term recipient outcomes. Further long-term studies are required to confirm our findings, especially with regard to nonanastomotic biliary complications.
微创供体肝切除术(MIDH)特有的一个问题是供体肝切除术后(供体热缺血时间[DWIT])移植物取出所需的时间延长。对于活体肝移植中微创供体肝切除术-DWIT对同种异体移植物功能的影响,从未有过客观评估。我们评估了机器人供体肝切除术(RDH)后DWIT对受者结局的影响,并将其与开放供体肝切除术(ODH)的匹配队列进行比较。分析了2019年9月至2023年7月期间进行的所有右半肝(RL)-RDH的人口统计学、围手术期和受者术后结局数据,并与同期RL-ODH的倾向评分匹配队列(1:1)进行比较。在总共103例RL-RDH和446例RL-ODH中,未匹配和倾向评分匹配分析(1:1)显示,与ODH组相比,RDH组的DWIT明显更长(9.33±3.95对2.87±2.13,P<.0001)。这并没有转化为早期移植物功能障碍(EAD)、胆道并发症、主要发病率或1个月和3个月总体生存率的任何差异。DWIT-早期移植物功能障碍的受试者工作特征曲线分析阈值为9分钟(受试者工作特征曲线下面积:0.67,敏感性=80%,特异性=53.8%)。我们表明,RDH中在可接受范围内延长的DWIT对受者短期结局没有有害影响。需要进一步的长期研究来证实我们的发现,特别是关于非吻合口胆道并发症的研究。