Melgarejo Segura María Teresa, Morales Martínez Ana, Yáñez Castillo Yaiza, Arrabal Polo Miguel Ángel, Gutiérrez Tejero Francisco, Pareja Vílchez Manuel, Arrabal Martín Miguel
Department of Urology, University Hospital SanCecilio, Granada, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. GRANADA, Complejo Hospitales Universitarios de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Bladder Cancer. 2023 Jun 27;9(2):159-166. doi: 10.3233/BLC-230042. eCollection 2023.
Devices that increase the penetrance of intravesical chemotherapeutics are emerging as alternatives to classical Bacillus Calmette Guérin (BCG) treatment.
To compare the efficacy of mitomycin C applied with the electromotive drug delivery device (MMC-EMDA) versus BCG in patients with intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) without carcinoma in situ (CIS).
Prospective non-randomized study in which 47 patients received MMC-EMDA (40 mg of MMC diluted in 50 mg of distilled water at 20 mA for 30 min. Regimen of 6 weekly and then 6 monthly instillations) and 48 patients received BCG (50 mg of OncoCITE® diluted in 50 ml of normal saline for 60 min. Regimen of 6 weekly instillations and then 3 weekly instillations at months 3, 6 and 12). The primary endpoint was the recurrence-free rate (RFR) at 24 months. Secondary endpoints were time to recurrence and progression-free rate (PFR) at 24 months follow-up.
Baseline patient assessment and mean follow-up time were similar in both groups (MMC-EMDA group: 26.4 months; BCG group: 28.4 months ( = 0.44)). The RFR at 24 months was 80.9% for the MMC-EMDA group and 77.1% for the BCG group ( = 0.969). The mean time to recurrence was 12.5 months in the MMC-EMDA group and 14 months in the BCG group ( = 0.681). At 24 months, PFR was 97.9% in the MMC-EMDA group and 93.8% in the BCG group ( = 0.419).
No differences were found between MMC-EMDA and BCG treatments in patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk NMIBC without CIS.
能够提高膀胱内化疗药物渗透性的设备正在成为经典卡介苗(BCG)治疗的替代方案。
比较在无原位癌(CIS)的中高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者中,使用电动药物输送装置应用丝裂霉素C(MMC-EMDA)与卡介苗的疗效。
前瞻性非随机研究,47例患者接受MMC-EMDA治疗(40mg丝裂霉素C稀释于50mg蒸馏水中,20mA持续30分钟。每周灌注6次,之后每月灌注6次的方案),48例患者接受卡介苗治疗(50mg OncoCITE®稀释于50ml生理盐水中持续60分钟。每周灌注6次,之后在第3、6和12个月每周灌注3次的方案)。主要终点是第24个月时的无复发生存率(RFR)。次要终点是复发时间和随访24个月时的无进展生存率(PFR)。
两组患者的基线评估和平均随访时间相似(MMC-EMDA组:26.4个月;卡介苗组:28.4个月(P = 0.44))。MMC-EMDA组第24个月时的RFR为80.9%,卡介苗组为77.1%(P = 0.969)。MMC-EMDA组的平均复发时间为12.5个月,卡介苗组为14个月(P = 0.681)。在24个月时,MMC-EMDA组的PFR为97.9%,卡介苗组为93.8%(P = 0.419)。
在无CIS的高危和中危NMIBC患者中,MMC-EMDA和卡介苗治疗之间未发现差异。