Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Apr;19(2):e100-e119. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
In cases of recurrent high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy (RC) is recommended. We compared oncologic and treatment-related outcomes of second-line conservative device-assisted therapy to RC.
In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 209 consecutive patients with recurrent bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; 107 subjects refused RC and were offered electromotive drug administration (n = 44) or chemohyperthermia (n = 63) (group A), and 102 patients underwent RC (group B). In group A, patients who did not benefit from device-assisted treatment underwent RC. The endpoints were high-grade disease-free survival, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and treatment-related complications. Follow-up was based on international guideline recommendations. Analyses were performed with log-rank and Fisher exact tests.
The median follow-up was 59 months (SD ± 5.3). When comparing group A to B, overall survival rates were 91.6% and 90.2%, respectively (P > .05); cancer-specific survival was 94.4% and 96.1%, respectively (P > .05); high-grade disease-free survival was 43% and 74.5%, respectively (P < .05); and progression-free survival was 59.8% and 75.5%, respectively (P < .05). Patients with carcinoma-in-situ had worse oncologic outcomes compared to patients with papillary disease. In the multivariate analysis, multifocality, disease recurrence, and progression risk group were independently associated with device treatment failure. The 90-day RC-related overall complications rates were 63.9% in group A and 66.6% in group B (P = .63); grade 3 to 5 complications were 9.8% in group A and 9.8% in group B(P = .99). Complications within group A were comparable (P > .05).
Device-assisted treatment may a represent a valid second-line conservative tool in selected patients with recurrent high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
对于复发性高危非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌,建议行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)。我们比较了二线保守性器械辅助治疗与 RC 的肿瘤学和治疗相关结局。
在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了 209 例复发性卡介苗无反应性高危非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者;107 例患者拒绝 RC 并接受电动力药物给药(n=44)或化疗热疗(n=63)(A 组),102 例患者行 RC(B 组)。在 A 组中,未从器械辅助治疗中获益的患者行 RC。终点为高级别无疾病生存率、无进展生存率、癌症特异性生存率、总生存率和治疗相关并发症。随访基于国际指南建议。分析采用对数秩和 Fisher 确切检验。
中位随访时间为 59 个月(标准差±5.3)。与 B 组相比,A 组的总生存率分别为 91.6%和 90.2%(P>.05);癌症特异性生存率分别为 94.4%和 96.1%(P>.05);高级别无疾病生存率分别为 43%和 74.5%(P<.05);无进展生存率分别为 59.8%和 75.5%(P<.05)。原位癌患者的肿瘤学结局较乳头状疾病患者差。多因素分析显示,多发病灶、疾病复发和进展风险组与器械治疗失败独立相关。A 组 90 天 RC 相关总并发症发生率为 63.9%,B 组为 66.6%(P=.63);3 至 5 级并发症发生率分别为 9.8%和 9.8%(P=.99)。A 组内并发症相当(P>.05)。
对于复发性高危非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者,器械辅助治疗可能是一种有效的二线保守治疗工具。