Pulferer Hannah S, Guan Cuntai, Müller-Putz Gernot R
Institute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jun 27;18:1383956. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1383956. eCollection 2024.
Accident analyses repeatedly reported the considerable contribution of run-off-road incidents to fatalities in road traffic, and despite considerable advances in assistive technologies to mitigate devastating consequences, little insight into the drivers' brain response during such accident scenarios has been gained. While various literature documents neural correlates to steering motion, the driver's mental state, and the impact of distraction and fatigue on driving performance, the cortical substrate of continuous deviations of a car from the road - i.e., how the brain represents a varying discrepancy between the intended and observed car position and subsequently assigns customized levels of corrective measures - remains unclear. Furthermore, the superposition of multiple subprocesses, such as visual and erroneous feedback processing, performance monitoring, or motor control, complicates a clear interpretation of engaged brain regions within car driving tasks. In the present study, we thus attempted to disentangle these subprocesses, employing passive and active steering conditions within both error-free and error-prone vehicle operation conditions. We recorded EEG signals of 26 participants in 13 sessions, simultaneously measuring pairs of Executors (actively steering) and Observers (strictly observing) during a car driving task. We observed common brain patterns in the Executors regardless of error-free or error-prone vehicle operation, albeit with a shift in spectral activity from motor beta to occipital alpha oscillations within erroneous conditions. Further, significant frontocentral differences between Observers and Executors, tracing back to the caudal anterior cingulate cortex, arose during active steering conditions, indicating increased levels of motor-behavioral cognitive control. Finally, we present regression results of both the steering signal and the car position, indicating that a regression of continuous deviations from the road utilizing the EEG might be feasible.
事故分析多次报告了冲出道路事故对道路交通死亡人数的重大影响,尽管在减轻灾难性后果的辅助技术方面取得了显著进展,但对于驾驶员在这种事故场景中的大脑反应仍知之甚少。虽然各种文献记录了与转向运动、驾驶员心理状态以及分心和疲劳对驾驶性能影响相关的神经关联,但汽车持续偏离道路的皮层基础——即大脑如何表征预期和观察到的汽车位置之间不断变化的差异,并随后分配定制的纠正措施水平——仍不清楚。此外,视觉和错误反馈处理、性能监测或运动控制等多个子过程的叠加,使得在汽车驾驶任务中对参与的大脑区域进行清晰解释变得复杂。因此,在本研究中,我们试图在无错误和易出错的车辆运行条件下,通过采用被动和主动转向条件来理清这些子过程。我们在13次实验中记录了26名参与者的脑电图信号,在汽车驾驶任务中同时测量执行者(主动转向)和观察者(严格观察)。我们观察到,无论车辆运行是无错误还是易出错,执行者都有共同的大脑模式,尽管在错误条件下频谱活动从运动β波转移到枕叶α波。此外,在主动转向条件下,观察者和执行者之间在前中央区域存在显著差异,可追溯到尾侧前扣带回皮层,这表明运动行为认知控制水平有所提高。最后,我们给出了转向信号和汽车位置的回归结果,表明利用脑电图对汽车与道路的持续偏差进行回归可能是可行的。