Hausam Joscha, Calvano Daniela, Opitz-Welke Annette
Institute of Forensic Psychiatry, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Prison Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 27;15:1362928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1362928. eCollection 2024.
Increased suicide rates in prison are a serious concern. Early identification of inmates at risk is a component of effective suicide prevention. The present study examined two suicide screening instruments in a sample of men in the Berlin, Germany, prison system (n = 289). The Screening for Initial Risk Assessment (SIRAS) identified significantly more high-risk inmates than the Vienna Instrument for Suicidality in Correctional Institutions (VISCI) (66 vs. 24). The results further show that the agreement in the classification was evident only in inmates with suicidal ideation, but was otherwise quite low. This can be explained by the fact that the instruments differ in terms of the risk factors taken into account. Finally, it was found that inmates classified as high risk received more monitoring and psychiatric or psychological support, which supports the construct validity of the instruments. As there were no deaths by suicide in the sample, no statistical information on the predictive validity of the instruments could be provided. Although research in this area is challenging, methodologically sound studies are needed to inform practice.
监狱中自杀率上升是一个严重问题。早期识别有风险的囚犯是有效预防自杀的一个组成部分。本研究在德国柏林监狱系统的男性样本(n = 289)中检验了两种自杀筛查工具。初始风险评估筛查(SIRAS)识别出的高风险囚犯比惩教机构自杀倾向维也纳工具(VISCI)显著更多(66人对24人)。结果还表明,分类一致性仅在有自杀意念的囚犯中明显,其他情况下则相当低。这可以通过这些工具在考虑的风险因素方面存在差异这一事实来解释。最后,发现被归类为高风险的囚犯受到了更多监测以及精神科或心理支持,这支持了这些工具的结构效度。由于样本中没有自杀死亡情况,无法提供关于这些工具预测效度的统计信息。尽管该领域的研究具有挑战性,但仍需要方法合理的研究为实践提供依据。