Ranjan Padhi Soumya, Gaikwad Shashank, Ranjan Alok, Gangurde Parag V, Mishra Harsh
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Department of Orthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 11;16(6):e62121. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62121. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Introduction Orthodontic mechanics involves transferring some of the applied force to the tooth's supporting components via friction, which in turn allows the tooth to move more easily. Aim The purpose of this in vitro experiment was to examine the frictional resistance (FR) of different lingual brackets utilizing Instron universal testing machines and nitinol (NiTi) archwires of varying sizes. Materials and methods Twenty-four sectional anterior die stones were replicated from a study model. They were categorized into eight categories, with the Libral lingual bracket and the JJ lingual bracket having 0.012" and 0.014" inch NiTi archwire, which were further subdivided into six subgroups. Three brackets were bonded to the anterior teeth of the upper and lower segments and replicated on other models with the help of silicon putty. Elastomeric modules were ligated to two diameters of NiTi wire (0.012" and 0.014") in each model. An Instron universal testing machine was used to measure the frictional force. Numerical data and descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation have been shown. Results In the overall analysis, it was observed that among JJ Orthodontics samples using 0.012" NiTi archwires, the maxilla exhibited a higher FR (4.205N) compared to the mandible (4.092N). Similarly, in the case of Libral Orthodontics samples with 0.012" NiTi archwires, the maxilla also demonstrated a higher FR (5.10N) than the mandible (4.97N). However, this trend did not hold for samples using 0.014" NiTi archwires. There was a statistically nonsignificant difference (p > 0.05) in the values between all the pairs of groups. Conclusion The present study concludes that Libral lingual brackets produced overall more FR than JJ lingual brackets.
引言
正畸力学涉及通过摩擦力将部分施加的力传递到牙齿的支持结构上,这反过来又使牙齿更容易移动。
目的
本体外实验的目的是利用英斯特朗万能材料试验机和不同尺寸的镍钛(NiTi)弓丝,检测不同舌侧托槽的摩擦阻力(FR)。
材料与方法
从一个研究模型复制了24个前部局部模型石膏。它们被分为八类,其中Libral舌侧托槽和JJ舌侧托槽分别搭配0.012英寸和0.014英寸的NiTi弓丝,这些又进一步细分为六个亚组。在上下颌前部牙齿上粘结三个托槽,并借助硅橡胶在其他模型上进行复制。在每个模型中,将弹性模块结扎到两种直径的NiTi丝(0.012英寸和0.014英寸)上。使用英斯特朗万能材料试验机测量摩擦力。展示了数值数据以及诸如均值和标准差等描述性统计量。
结果
在总体分析中,观察到在使用0.012英寸NiTi弓丝的JJ正畸样本中,上颌的FR(4.205N)高于下颌(4.092N)。同样,在使用0.012英寸NiTi弓丝的Libral正畸样本中,上颌的FR(5.10N)也高于下颌(4.97N)。然而,对于使用0.014英寸NiTi弓丝的样本,这种趋势并不成立。所有组对之间的值存在统计学上无显著差异(p>0.05)。
结论
本研究得出结论,Libral舌侧托槽产生的总体FR比JJ舌侧托槽更多。