• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于形态学和DNA条形码对韩国螳螂目进行的分类学综述。

A taxonomic review of the order Mantodea in Korea based on morphology and DNA barcodes.

作者信息

Shim Jaeil, Song Jeong-Hun

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea National Institute of Agricultural Sciences Wanju Republic of Korea.

Department of Biology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea Chungnam National University Daejeon Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Zookeys. 2024 Jul 2;1206:1-43. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1206.123355. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3897/zookeys.1206.123355
PMID:38993689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11233986/
Abstract

A taxonomic study of Korean Mantodea using morphological and molecular characters (COI) is presented. Eight species [ (Shiraki, 1908), Westwood, 1889, Bazyluk, 1960, (Thunberg, 1784), Saussure, 1869, Saussure, 1871, Werner, 1929, (Audinet-Serville, 1838)] belonging to six genera in three families are recognized. Interspecific genetic divergence of COI using uncorrected -distance ranged from 6.7% to 22.4%, while intraspecific divergence ranged from 0% to 2.2% among eight Korean Mantodea species. All eight species were each strongly supported as a single lineage using COI on both neighbor-joining and parsimony trees. An illustrated key, redescriptions, habitus photographs, and illustrations of diagnostic characters of the species of Korean Mantodea are provided to facilitate identification.

摘要

本文呈现了一项利用形态学和分子特征（细胞色素氧化酶亚基I，COI）对韩国螳螂目进行的分类学研究。识别出了隶属于三个科六个属的八个物种[（白木，1908年）、韦斯特伍德，1889年、巴齐卢克，1960年、（桑伯格，1784年）、索绪尔，1869年、索绪尔，1871年、维尔纳，1929年、（奥迪内-塞尔维尔，1838年）]。在八个韩国螳螂目物种中，使用未校正距离的COI种间遗传分歧范围为6.7%至22.4%，而种内分歧范围为0%至2.2%。在邻接法和简约法树上，所有八个物种均各自作为一个单独的谱系得到了有力支持。提供了一份带插图的检索表、重新描述、整体照以及韩国螳螂目物种鉴别特征的插图，以方便识别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/aff642a97530/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/f1d4f47ec489/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/1127f9ad5b59/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/a828766681cd/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/d17239f303a9/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/88cdff5a21a8/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/5a56a5aaab17/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/d2ed1d8793f5/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/0abcfb71255b/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/1d3245caac5a/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/934d16385790/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/897f43021ebf/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/3ca5abc3aac8/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/de630f804f81/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/9663874b5eef/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/d77b790740e2/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/b84c0551eb59/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/f4f9ce1e2258/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/c808a7797059/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/b2524c2e6b5f/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/aff642a97530/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/f1d4f47ec489/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/1127f9ad5b59/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/a828766681cd/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/d17239f303a9/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/88cdff5a21a8/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/5a56a5aaab17/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/d2ed1d8793f5/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/0abcfb71255b/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/1d3245caac5a/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/934d16385790/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/897f43021ebf/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/3ca5abc3aac8/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/de630f804f81/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/9663874b5eef/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/d77b790740e2/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/b84c0551eb59/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/f4f9ce1e2258/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/c808a7797059/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/b2524c2e6b5f/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b27c/11233986/aff642a97530/zookeys-1206-001_article-123355__-g020.jpg

相似文献

1
A taxonomic review of the order Mantodea in Korea based on morphology and DNA barcodes.基于形态学和DNA条形码对韩国螳螂目进行的分类学综述。
Zookeys. 2024 Jul 2;1206:1-43. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1206.123355. eCollection 2024.
2
Species delimitation of the praying mantis emHierodula/em empatellifera/em (Audinet-Serville) based on morphological and molecular characters (Mantodea: Mantidae).基于形态和分子特征的拟态螳Hierodulaempatellifera(Audinet-Serville)种的划分（螳螂目：螳科）。
Zootaxa. 2021 Apr 1;4951(1):zootaxa.4951.1.7. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4951.1.7.
3
Revision of the Neotropical bark mantis genus Liturgusa Saussure, 1869 (Insecta, Mantodea, Liturgusini).新热带树皮螳螂属Liturgusa Saussure（1869年）的修订（昆虫纲，螳螂目，Liturgusini族）
Zookeys. 2014 Mar 18(390):1-214. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.390.6661. eCollection 2014.
4
A taxonomic review of the coastal genus Iotarphia Cameron (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) with a description of new species based on morphological and molecular characters.沿海属 Iotarphia Cameron（鞘翅目：隐翅虫科：Aleocharinae）的分类学研究，基于形态和分子特征描述了新种。
Zootaxa. 2021 Jan 29;4920(3):zootaxa.4920.3.7. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4920.3.7.
5
Studies on Neotropical Phasmatodea XVI: Revision of Haplopodini Günther, 1953 (rev. stat.), with notes on the subfamily Cladomorphinae Bradley & Galil, 1977 and the descriptions of a new tribe, four new genera and nine new species (Phasmatodea: "Anareolatae": Phasmatidae: Cladomorphinae).新热带区竹节虫研究 XVI：1953年冈瑟对Haplopodini的修订（修订状态），附关于1977年布拉德利和加利尔的Cladomorphinae亚科的注释以及一个新部落、四个新属和九个新物种的描述（竹节虫目：“Anareolatae”：竹节虫科：Cladomorphinae）
Zootaxa. 2016 Jun 27;4128(1):1-211. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4128.1.1.
6
Integrative taxonomy of coastal (Erichson) species complex (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae).沿海（ Erichson ）物种复合体（鞘翅目，隐翅虫科）的综合分类学
Zookeys. 2022 May 12;1100:57-70. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1100.79435. eCollection 2022.
7
Mitochondrial COI and Cytb gene as valid molecular identification marker of sandfly species (Diptera: Psychodidae) in China.线粒体 COI 和 Cytb 基因可作为中国沙蝇种（双翅目：Psychodidae）的有效分子鉴定标记。
Acta Trop. 2023 Feb;238:106798. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106798. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
8
Mantidis Oötheca (mantis egg case) original species identification via morphological analysis and DNA barcoding.螳螂卵鞘（螳螂卵囊）的原始物种鉴定通过形态分析和 DNA 条形码技术。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2020 Apr 24;252:112574. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112574. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
9
DNA Barcoding to Improve the Taxonomy of the Afrotropical Hoverflies (Insecta: Diptera: Syrphidae).DNA条形码技术用于改进非洲热带食蚜蝇（昆虫纲：双翅目：食蚜蝇科）的分类学
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 16;10(10):e0140264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140264. eCollection 2015.
10
Behavioral Comparison in Males of Two Praying Mantis Species of the Same Genus, Hierodula patellifera and H. chinensis (Mantodea: Mantidae: Hierodulinae) in Japan, in Response to the Conspecific or Allospecific Species of Calling Females and Females' Headspace Crude Extract.日本同一属的两种螳螂，中华大刀螳和狭翅大刀螳（螳螂目：螳螂科：大刀螳属）雄性对同种或异种求偶雌性及雌性触角粗提物的行为比较
Environ Entomol. 2022 Oct 21;51(5):885-891. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvac070.

引用本文的文献

1
EntoSieve: Automated Size-Sorting of Insect Bulk Samples to Aid Accurate Megabarcoding and Metabarcoding.EntoSieve：昆虫大量样本的自动大小分选，以助力准确的宏条形码和元条形码分析。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2025 Aug;25(6):e14097. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.14097. Epub 2025 Mar 11.

本文引用的文献

1
On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature.关于DNA条形码文献中木村二参数（K2P）差异的不当使用
Cladistics. 2012 Apr;28(2):190-194. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00370.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
2
Species delimitation of the praying mantis emHierodula/em empatellifera/em (Audinet-Serville) based on morphological and molecular characters (Mantodea: Mantidae).基于形态和分子特征的拟态螳Hierodulaempatellifera(Audinet-Serville)种的划分（螳螂目：螳科）。
Zootaxa. 2021 Apr 1;4951(1):zootaxa.4951.1.7. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4951.1.7.
3
Taxonomic revision of the praying mantis subfamily Hierodulinae of China (Mantodea: Mantidae).
中国螳蛉亚科（Mantodea：Mantidae）的分类修订。
Zootaxa. 2021 Apr 7;4951(3):zootaxa.4951.3.1. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4951.3.1.
4
When Citizen Science highlights alien invasive species in France: the case of Indochina mantis, (Insecta, Mantodea, Mantidae).当公民科学聚焦法国的外来入侵物种：以印支螳螂（昆虫纲，螳螂目，螳螂科）为例。
Biodivers Data J. 2020 Jan 7;8:e46989. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e46989. eCollection 2020.
5
MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.MEGA X：跨越计算平台的分子进化遗传学分析。
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096.
6
Manual of praying mantis morphology, nomenclature, and practices (Insecta, Mantodea).螳螂形态学、命名法及习性手册（昆虫纲，螳螂目）
Zookeys. 2017 Sep 13(696):1-100. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.696.12542. eCollection 2017.
7
A case of the higher-level classification of praying mantises (Mantodea) obscuring the synonymy of Majangella Giglio-Tos, 1915 (Liturgusidae, Liturgusinae) and Ephippiomantis Werner, 1922 (Hymenopodidae, Acromantinae).一例螳螂（螳螂目）的高级分类掩盖了1915年吉廖 - 托斯的马江吉拉属（Liturgusidae科，Liturgusinae亚科）与1922年维尔纳的鞍背螳螂属（Hymenopodidae科，Acromantinae亚科）同义关系的案例。
Zootaxa. 2014 May 21(3797):103-19. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3797.1.10.
8
A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.一种通过核苷酸序列比较研究来估计碱基替换进化速率的简单方法。
J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581.