Reichel Katrin, Hahlbohm Patricia, Kromrey Marie-Luise, Nebelung Heiner, Schön Felix, Kamin Konrad, Goronzy Jens, Kühn Jens-Peter, Hoffmann Ralf-Thorsten, Blum Sophia Freya Ulrike
Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
University Center of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):487-495. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10933-y. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
To determine the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of fast whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) compared to whole-body computed tomography (WB-CT) in detecting injuries of slightly to moderately injured trauma patients.
In a prospective single-center approach, trauma patients from convenience sampling with an expected Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score ≤ 3 at admission, received an indicated contrast-enhanced WB-CT (reference standard) and a plain WB-MRI (index test) voluntarily up to five days after trauma. Two radiologists, blinded to the WB-CT findings, evaluated the absence or presence of injuries with WB-MRI in four body regions: head, torso, axial skeleton, and upper extremity. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value by body region.
Between June 2019 and July 2021, 40 patients were assessed for eligibility of whom 35 (median age (interquartile range): 50 (32.5) years; 26 men) received WB-MRI. Of 140 body regions (35 patients × 4 regions), 31 true positive, 6 false positive, 94 true negative, and 9 false negative findings were documented with WB-MRI. Thus, plain WB-MRI achieved a total sensitivity of 77.5% (95%-confidence interval (CI): (61.6-89.2%)), specificity of 94% (95%-CI: (87.4-97.8%)), and diagnostic accuracy of 89.3% (95%-CI: (82.9-93.9%)). Across the four regions sensitivity and specificity varied: head (66.7%/93.1%), torso (62.5%/96.3%), axial skeleton (91.3%/75%), upper extremity (33.3%/100%). Both radiologists showed substantial agreement on the WB-MRI reading (Cohen's Kappa: 0.66, 95%-CI: (0.51-0.81)).
Regarding injury detection, WB-MRI is feasible in slightly to moderately injured trauma patients, especially in the axial skeleton.
Besides offering a radiation-free approach, whole-body MRI detects injuries almost identically to whole-body CT in slightly to moderately injured trauma patients, who comprise a relevant share of all trauma patients.
Whole-body MRI could offer radiation-free injury detection in slightly to moderately injured trauma patients. Whole-body MRI detected injuries almost identically compared to whole-body CT in this population. Whole-body MRI could be a radiation-free approach for slightly to moderately injured young trauma patients.
比较快速全身磁共振成像(WB - MRI)与全身计算机断层扫描(WB - CT)在检测轻度至中度受伤创伤患者损伤方面的可行性和诊断准确性。
采用前瞻性单中心研究方法,对方便抽样的入院时预计简明损伤定级标准(AIS)评分≤3分的创伤患者,在创伤后至多5天内自愿接受增强WB - CT(参考标准)和平扫WB - MRI(指标检测)。两名对WB - CT结果不知情的放射科医生评估四个身体部位(头部、躯干、中轴骨骼和上肢)WB - MRI有无损伤情况。按身体部位通过敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值确定诊断准确性。
2019年6月至2021年7月,评估了40例患者的入选资格,其中35例(中位年龄(四分位间距):50(32.5)岁;26例男性)接受了WB - MRI检查。在140个身体部位(35例患者×4个部位)中,WB - MRI记录到31例假阳性、6例假阴性、94例真阴性和9例真阳性结果。因此,平扫WB - MRI的总敏感度为77.5%(95%置信区间(CI):(61.6 - 89.2%)),特异度为94%(95%CI:(87.4 - 97.8%)),诊断准确性为89.3%(95%CI:(82.9 - 93.9%))。在四个部位中,敏感度和特异度有所不同:头部(66.7%/93.1%)、躯干(62.5%/96.3%)、中轴骨骼(91.3%/75%)、上肢(33.3%/100%)。两名放射科医生在WB - MRI阅片上表现出高度一致性(科恩kappa系数:0.66,95%CI:(0.51 - 0.81))。
在损伤检测方面,WB - MRI对轻度至中度受伤创伤患者可行,尤其是在中轴骨骼部位。
除了提供无辐射的检查方法外,全身MRI在轻度至中度受伤创伤患者(这些患者在所有创伤患者中占相当比例)中检测损伤的效果与全身CT几乎相同。
全身MRI可为轻度至中度受伤创伤患者提供无辐射的损伤检测。在该人群中,全身MRI检测损伤的效果与全身CT几乎相同。全身MRI可能是轻度至中度受伤年轻创伤患者的无辐射检查方法。