Grüssner R, Rückert K, Klotter H J, Kuhnert A
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1985 Oct 4;110(40):1521-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1069040.
The reliability of sonography and peritoneal lavage in assessing the need for immediate surgical intervention in blunt abdominal trauma was examined in a controlled prospective and retrospective study. Whereas no false results occurred using peritoneal lavage, false negative findings in sonography were 9.8% and false positive findings 3.9%. A significant difference was also found on retrospective evaluation of all cases with diagnostic peritoneal lavage (2.2% false results) and ultrasound investigations (14.9% false results). This demonstrates that sonography cannot fully replace peritoneal lavage as a diagnostic method in blunt abdominal trauma.
在一项前瞻性与回顾性对照研究中,对超声检查和腹腔灌洗在评估钝性腹部创伤后是否需要立即进行手术干预方面的可靠性进行了研究。腹腔灌洗未出现假结果,而超声检查的假阴性结果为9.8%,假阳性结果为3.9%。对所有诊断性腹腔灌洗病例(2.2%假结果)和超声检查病例(14.9%假结果)进行回顾性评估时也发现了显著差异。这表明在钝性腹部创伤的诊断中,超声检查不能完全取代腹腔灌洗作为一种诊断方法。