Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Meir Medical Center, Kefar Sava, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Kidney360. 2024 Aug 1;5(8):1137-1144. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000505. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
This study showed variation in satisfaction and quality of life between three dialysis centers, suggesting local factors influence outcomes. One center linked better dialysis to less satisfaction, but fully grasping satisfaction differences between sites warrants additional study.
The concept of patient-centered care puts the individual's health needs and desired health outcomes as the driving forces behind medical decision making and quality assessment in the health care system. Patients with ESKD treated by hemodialysis require frequent encounters with the dialysis facility to survive. Therefore, their satisfaction with care and perceived patient experience are important aspects that might affect their adherence to the care regimen. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and its association with perceived patient experience and objective clinical quality parameters, across three hemodialysis clinics.
A prospective cohort study analyzed the data of 126 patients with ESKD receiving chronic hemodialysis over 9 months in three different care facilities. Sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, treatment details, and dialysis adequacy (measures as STDKt/V) were collected. Perceived quality of care, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes were assessed.
Patients differed significantly between sites by age, diabetes status, and biochemical parameters. Satisfaction scores varied significantly for 12/14 survey questions and at the site-level, with site 2 scoring the highest. Overall satisfaction did not correlate with Kt/V. At site 1, a moderate negative correlation was found between satisfaction and Kt/V. Kt/V correlated positively with age but inversely with satisfaction. Hospitalization rates were similar regardless of satisfaction. Mortality trended lower in the highest Kt/V quartile.
Achieving clinical quality while optimizing patient satisfaction requires multifactorial approaches tailored to the unique population of the hemodialysis facility. Further research is needed to fully understand factors influencing satisfaction and perceived quality.
本研究表明,三家透析中心的患者满意度和生活质量存在差异,这表明当地因素会影响治疗结果。有一个中心的透析效果越好,患者满意度越低,但要全面了解各中心之间满意度的差异,还需要进一步研究。
以患者为中心的医疗照护理念将个人的健康需求和期望的健康结果作为医疗决策和医疗体系质量评估的驱动力。接受血液透析治疗的终末期肾病患者需要频繁到透析中心接受治疗才能存活。因此,他们对护理的满意度和对患者体验的感知是重要的方面,可能会影响他们对护理方案的依从性。本研究旨在评估患者满意度及其与感知患者体验和客观临床质量参数的关系,在三家血液透析诊所进行。
前瞻性队列研究分析了在三家不同护理机构接受慢性血液透析治疗的 126 例终末期肾病患者的 9 个月数据。收集了社会人口统计学特征、病史、治疗细节和透析充分性(以 STDKt/V 衡量)。评估了感知的护理质量、患者满意度和临床结果。
患者在年龄、糖尿病状况和生化参数方面在站点间存在显著差异。14 项调查问题中的 12 项问题和站点水平的满意度评分存在显著差异,站点 2 的评分最高。总体满意度与 Kt/V 无相关性。在站点 1,满意度与 Kt/V 之间存在中度负相关。Kt/V 与年龄呈正相关,但与满意度呈负相关。住院率与满意度无关。死亡率在 Kt/V 最高的四分位组中呈下降趋势。
在优化患者满意度的同时实现临床质量需要采用针对血液透析机构独特人群的多因素方法。需要进一步研究以充分了解影响满意度和感知质量的因素。