Gesheff Martin G, Scalzitti David A, Bains Sandeep S, Dubin Jeremy, Delanois Ronald E
Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, LifeBridge Health, Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Health, Human Function, and Rehabilitation Sciences, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 27;13(13):3764. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133764.
Disease-modifying treatments are not currently developed to target the underlying causes of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Corticosteroids (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular (IA) injections are commonly used for patients that do not respond to non-pharmacological treatments, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, or pain medications to address solely KOA symptoms. Utilizing TKA as an endpoint in the KOA disease progression provides a basis to determine efficacy of this treatment pathway. The primary objective is to evaluate a large national database to determine the time between first injection and total knee arthroplasty in patients solely administered intra-articular IA, CS, and HA. A retrospective query was performed on a national, all-payer claims database (PearlDiver, Colorado Springs, CO, USA), a composite of over 160 million Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant orthopedic records across all states and territories of the United States spanning 2016 to 2022. The database was queried to produce three distinct cohorts for analysis (PRP, HA, and CS). A 4:1 case match was conducted to compare cohorts receiving a subsequent TKA. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis analyzed the TKA-free survival of patients within each group at 6 months and 1 to 4 years. The log-rank test was performed for comparisons between survival cohorts. The PRP cohort had a total population of 3240 patients, of which 71 (2.2%) received a subsequent TKA. The corticosteroid cohort had a total population of 1,382,572, of which 81,271 (5.9%) received a subsequent TKA. The HA cohort had a total population of 164,000, of which 13,044 (8.0%) received a subsequent TKA. Due to the low population within the PRP group, this group was excluded from comparison. The mean time to TKA from first injection in the HA group was 377.8 days, while in the corticosteroid group it was 370.0 days. The proportions of TKA-free survival for CS and HA when compared at 4 years post-injection was similar between groups ( = 0.05). Patients that received only IA-corticosteroids or IA-hyaluronic acid had a similar length of time between the first injection and the total knee arthroplasty associated with the injected joint. This evidence provides information for clinicians and patients alike when contemplating these non-surgical injection modalities for KOA. The similarity observed between these treatments supports the need for future research to determine whether there is any potential for reduction in healthcare costs for KOA treatment prior to TKA.
目前尚未开发出针对膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)根本病因的病情改善疗法。对于对非药物治疗、口服非甾体抗炎药或止痛药物无反应的患者,常用皮质类固醇(CS)、透明质酸(HA)和富血小板血浆(PRP)关节内(IA)注射来单纯缓解KOA症状。将全膝关节置换术(TKA)作为KOA疾病进展的终点,为确定该治疗途径的疗效提供了依据。主要目的是评估一个大型国家数据库,以确定仅接受关节内IA、CS和HA注射的患者首次注射与全膝关节置换术之间的时间。对一个全国性的、涵盖所有支付方的索赔数据库(PearlDiver,美国科罗拉多州科泉市)进行了回顾性查询,该数据库是2016年至2022年期间美国所有州和地区超过1.6亿份符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》的骨科记录的综合数据。查询该数据库以生成三个不同的队列进行分析(PRP、HA和CS)。进行了4:1的病例匹配以比较接受后续TKA的队列。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析来分析每组患者在6个月以及1至4年内无TKA的生存率。对生存队列之间进行比较时采用对数秩检验。PRP队列共有3240名患者,其中71名(2.2%)接受了后续TKA。皮质类固醇队列共有1382572名患者,其中81271名(5.9%)接受了后续TKA。HA队列共有164000名患者,其中13044名(8.0%)接受了后续TKA。由于PRP组的患者数量较少,该组被排除在比较之外。HA组从首次注射到TKA的平均时间为377.8天,而皮质类固醇组为370.0天。注射后4年时,CS和HA无TKA生存率在组间相似(P = 0.05)。仅接受关节内皮质类固醇或关节内透明质酸注射的患者,首次注射与注射关节相关的全膝关节置换术之间的时间长度相似。这一证据为临床医生和患者在考虑这些用于KOA的非手术注射方式时提供了信息。这些治疗方法之间观察到的相似性支持了未来开展研究的必要性,以确定在TKA之前KOA治疗是否有降低医疗成本的潜力。