Department of Computer Science, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, USA.
Population Health, Epic Systems, Verona, WI 53593, USA.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 5;24(13):4361. doi: 10.3390/s24134361.
The paper "Using Absorption Models for Insulin and Carbohydrates and Deep Leaning to Improve Glucose Level Predictions" (, , 5273) proposes a novel approach to predicting blood glucose levels for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). By building exponential models from raw carbohydrate and insulin data to simulate the absorption in the body, the authors reported a reduction in their model's root-mean-square error (RMSE) from 15.5 mg/dL (raw) to 9.2 mg/dL (exponential) when predicting blood glucose levels one hour into the future. In this comment, we demonstrate that the experimental techniques used in that paper are flawed, which invalidates its results and conclusions. Specifically, after reviewing the authors' code, we found that the model validation scheme was malformed, namely, the training and test data from the same time intervals were mixed. This means that the reported RMSE numbers in the referenced paper did not accurately measure the predictive capabilities of the approaches that were presented. We repaired the measurement technique by appropriately isolating the training and test data, and we discovered that their models actually performed dramatically worse than was reported in the paper. In fact, the models presented in the that paper do not appear to perform any better than a naive model that predicts future glucose levels to be the same as the current ones.
这篇论文“使用胰岛素和碳水化合物的吸收模型和深度学习来提高血糖水平预测”(,,5273)提出了一种新的方法来预测 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖水平。通过从原始碳水化合物和胰岛素数据构建指数模型来模拟体内的吸收,作者报告说,当预测未来 1 小时的血糖水平时,他们的模型的均方根误差(RMSE)从 15.5mg/dL(原始)降低到 9.2mg/dL(指数)。在这篇评论中,我们证明了该论文中使用的实验技术存在缺陷,这使得其结果和结论无效。具体来说,在审查了作者的代码后,我们发现模型验证方案存在缺陷,即训练数据和测试数据来自同一时间间隔。这意味着,在参考论文中报告的 RMSE 数字并没有准确地衡量所提出的方法的预测能力。我们通过适当隔离训练数据和测试数据来修复测量技术,结果发现他们的模型的实际表现比论文中报告的要差得多。事实上,该论文中提出的模型似乎并不比预测未来血糖水平与当前水平相同的简单模型表现得更好。