Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Biomechanics & Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Autism Res. 2024 Oct;17(10):2079-2091. doi: 10.1002/aur.3189. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
Motor delays in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are being increasingly recognized using a brief screening tool, called the Developmental Coordination Disorder-Questionnaire (DCD-Q). Further validation of these motor delays using a more robust normed, developmental measure is clearly warranted. In this analysis, a nationally representative sample from the SPARK study was used wherein parents completed the DCD-Q and a more widely used developmental/adaptive functioning measure, called the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS); which comprises of various developmental domains including the motor domain (N = 2,644 completed the DCD-Q and VABS). Eighty two percent children with ASD had a motor delay based on their DCD-Q scores whereas 77% children with ASD had a motor delay based on their VABS motor domain scores. Approximately 70% children with ASD had concurrent motor delay on the DCD-Q and the VABS (i.e., positive predictive value of DCD-Q). Furthermore, there was 81.2% accuracy in reporting a risk/no risk of motor delay across both measures. Overall, these statistics align with the recent reports on proportions of children with ASD having motor delays. Parents of ~70% children with ASD are reporting motor delays that are corroborated across two different motor measures. This not only validates the motor delays reported based on the DCD-Q but also indicates the need for concurrent motor screening using both DCD-Q and VABS for better detection of motor delays in children with ASD. Only 10%-32% of the current SPARK sample received any physical or recreational therapies. This mismatch between presence of motor delays and the lack of access to motor services highlights the need for more motor intervention referrals for children with ASD.
儿童自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的运动发育迟缓正越来越多地通过一种简短的筛查工具来识别,这种工具称为发育协调障碍问卷(DCD-Q)。使用更强大的标准化、发育性测量方法进一步验证这些运动发育迟缓显然是必要的。在这项分析中,使用了 SPARK 研究中的一个具有全国代表性的样本,其中父母完成了 DCD-Q 和一个更广泛使用的发育/适应功能测量,称为 Vineland 适应行为量表(VABS);它包括各种发育领域,包括运动领域(N=2644 人完成了 DCD-Q 和 VABS)。82%的 ASD 儿童根据他们的 DCD-Q 分数存在运动发育迟缓,而 77%的 ASD 儿童根据他们的 VABS 运动领域分数存在运动发育迟缓。大约 70%的 ASD 儿童在 DCD-Q 和 VABS 上同时存在运动发育迟缓(即 DCD-Q 的阳性预测值)。此外,在这两种测量方法中,报告运动发育迟缓的风险/无风险的准确率为 81.2%。总体而言,这些统计数据与最近关于 ASD 儿童运动发育迟缓比例的报告一致。大约 70%的 ASD 儿童的父母报告了运动发育迟缓,这在两种不同的运动测量中得到了证实。这不仅验证了基于 DCD-Q 报告的运动发育迟缓,还表明需要同时使用 DCD-Q 和 VABS 进行运动筛查,以更好地发现 ASD 儿童的运动发育迟缓。目前 SPARK 样本中只有 10%-32%的儿童接受过任何身体或娱乐治疗。运动发育迟缓的存在与运动服务缺乏之间的不匹配突出表明,需要为 ASD 儿童提供更多的运动干预转介。