• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自闭症青少年自我报告的抑郁和焦虑症状的稳定性与有效性

Stability and Validity of Self-Reported Depression and Anxiety in Autistic Youth.

作者信息

Kim Soo Youn, Lecavalier Luc

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Nisonger Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Jul 13. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06456-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-024-06456-6
PMID:39001970
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess test-retest reliability and diagnostic validity of self-report instruments of depression and anxiety in autistic youth. Participants were 55 autistic youth aged 8-17 years presenting with depressive or anxiety symptoms. They were interviewed with the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS-PL) and completed the Children's Depression Inventory, Second Edition - Self Report Short (CDI 2:SR[S]) and the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) twice, separated by a two-week interval. Test-retest reliability was measured with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and diagnostic validity was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with the summary ratings on the K-SADS-PL as the criterion. The effect of participant characteristics was analyzed through a moderation analysis. Generalized anxiety (GAD) and social anxiety disorder (SOC) were the two most prevalent disorders in the sample. Test-retest reliability for most of the subscales was good (ICC = 0.74 - 0.87), with the exception of the RCADS obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and GAD. The Adaptive Behavior conceptual score was a significant moderator of the reliability of the CDI 2:SR[S]. The ROC analysis suggested the RCADS SOC and the CDI 2:SR[S] to be good screening tools with inadequate specificity when appropriately sensitive cutoff scores are used. Optimal cutoff scores in this sample were lower than originally published. The findings suggest that autistic youth can provide stable reports of anxiety and depressive symptoms over time. Diagnostic validity varied according to the construct and instrument.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估自闭症青少年抑郁和焦虑自我报告工具的重测信度和诊断效度。研究参与者为55名年龄在8至17岁之间、有抑郁或焦虑症状的自闭症青少年。他们接受了《学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表》(K-SADS-PL)的访谈,并两次完成了《儿童抑郁量表第二版 - 自我报告简表》(CDI 2:SR[S])和《修订版儿童焦虑与抑郁量表》(RCADS),两次测试间隔两周。重测信度用组内相关系数(ICC)衡量,诊断效度以K-SADS-PL的总结评分作为标准,通过绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行评估。通过调节分析来分析参与者特征的影响。广泛性焦虑症(GAD)和社交焦虑症(SOC)是样本中最常见的两种疾病。除了RCADS中的强迫症(OCD)和GAD分量表外,大多数分量表的重测信度良好(ICC = 0.74 - 0.87)。适应性行为概念得分是CDI 2:SR[S]信度的一个显著调节因素。ROC分析表明,当使用适当敏感的临界分数时,RCADS的SOC分量表和CDI 2:SR[S]是良好的筛查工具,但特异性不足。本样本中的最佳临界分数低于最初公布的分数。研究结果表明,随着时间推移,自闭症青少年能够提供稳定的焦虑和抑郁症状报告。诊断效度因结构和工具而异。

相似文献

1
Stability and Validity of Self-Reported Depression and Anxiety in Autistic Youth.自闭症青少年自我报告的抑郁和焦虑症状的稳定性与有效性
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Jul 13. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06456-6.
2
Psychometric properties of the revised children's anxiety and depression scale (RCADS) for autistic youth without co-occurring intellectual disability.修订版儿童焦虑与抑郁量表(RCADS)用于无并发智力障碍的自闭症青少年的心理测量特性。
J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2023 Aug;2. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2023.100017. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
3
Convergent and divergent validity of the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children - present and lifetime version diagnoses in a sample of children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder.学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症评定量表的聚合效度和区分效度——针对患有强迫症的儿童和青少年样本的当前及终生版本诊断
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;73(2):111-117. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1571628. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
4
Psychometric evaluation of two short versions of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale.修订版儿童焦虑抑郁量表两个简短版本的心理计量学评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 5;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2444-5.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Children's Depression Inventory 2 Short Version as a Screening Tool: A Comparison With the Standard 28-Item Version.儿童抑郁量表2简版韩文版作为筛查工具的信效度:与标准28项版本的比较
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Jan;19(1):54-60. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0296. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
6
Psychometric Properties and Factor Structures of the Korean Version of Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised.儿童抑郁评定量表修订版韩文版的心理测量特性与因子结构
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018 May;28(4):285-292. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0183. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
7
[Reliability and Validity of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version, DSM-5 November 2016-Turkish Adaptation (K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T)].《学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表(目前及终生版),DSM - 5(2016年11月) - 土耳其语改编版(K - SADS - PL - DSM - 5 - T)》的信效度
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2019 Spring;30(1):42-50.
8
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the kiddie-schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia-present and lifetime version DSM-5 (K-SADS-PL-C DSM-5).中文版本的儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症谱系及诊断与统计手册-5 现行版(K-SADS-PL-C DSM-5)的可靠性和有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 15;317:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.062. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
9
[Diagnostic structured interviews in child and adolescent's psychiatry].[儿童和青少年精神病学中的诊断性结构化访谈]
Encephale. 2004 Mar-Apr;30(2):122-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95422-x.
10
Navigating young minds: reliability and validity of the Greek version of kiddie - schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia - present and lifetime DSM-5 version (K-SADS-PL-GR-5).少年心境导航:希腊版儿童心境障碍与精神分裂症谱系及诊断与统计手册-第五版现用及终身版定式访谈(K-SADS-PL-GR-5)的信度和效度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 22;23(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05076-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental Health Surveillance Among Children - United States, 2013-2019.儿童心理健康监测 - 美国,2013-2019 年。
MMWR Suppl. 2022 Feb 25;71(2):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su7102a1.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Children's Depression Inventory 2 Short Version as a Screening Tool: A Comparison With the Standard 28-Item Version.儿童抑郁量表2简版韩文版作为筛查工具的信效度:与标准28项版本的比较
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Jan;19(1):54-60. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0296. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
3
Evaluating the Use of Self-reported Measures in Autistic Individuals in the Context of Psychiatric Assessment: A Systematic Review.
评估自闭症个体在精神评估背景下使用自我报告测量的情况:系统综述。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Oct;52(10):4355-4374. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05323-y. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
4
A Scoping Review of Anxiety in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍儿童焦虑的范围综述。
Autism Res. 2020 Dec;13(12):2038-2057. doi: 10.1002/aur.2395. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
5
The relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and anxiety in autism: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.自闭症中不确定性不耐受与焦虑之间的关系:一项系统文献综述与荟萃分析。
Autism. 2020 Nov;24(8):1933-1944. doi: 10.1177/1362361320932437. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
Prevalence of comorbid psychiatric disorders among people with autism spectrum disorder: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.自闭症谱系障碍患者共患精神障碍的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞式综述。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 May;287:112922. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112922. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
7
Anxiety in young people with autism spectrum disorder: Common and autism-related anxiety experiences and their associations with individual characteristics.自闭症谱系障碍青少年的焦虑:常见的自闭症相关焦虑体验及其与个体特征的关联。
Autism. 2020 Jul;24(5):1111-1126. doi: 10.1177/1362361319886246. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自闭症人群中共病心理健康诊断的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;6(10):819-829. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-5. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
9
Depression in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍青少年的抑郁。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2019 Jul;28(3):397-409. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
Network Analysis of Behaviors in the Depression and Autism Realms: Inter-Relationships and Clinical Implications.网络分析在抑郁和自闭症领域行为的相关性研究:关联性和临床意义。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 May;50(5):1580-1595. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03914-4.