Suppr超能文献

肺癌肺段切除术不同手术入路的趋势及比较结果

Trends and comparative outcomes between operative approaches for segmentectomy in lung cancer.

作者信息

Watkins Ammara A, Rizvi Tasneem Z, Lopez Edilin, Shehata Dena, Ssemaganda Henry, Lin Zhibang, Stock Cameron T, Moffatt-Bruce Susan D, Servais Elliot L

机构信息

Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Mass; Department of Surgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.

Department of Surgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass; Department of Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Mass.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Mar;169(3):745-752.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.07.005. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Segmentectomy is increasingly performed for non-small cell lung cancer. However, comparative outcomes data among open, robotic-assisted, and video-assisted thoracoscopic approaches are limited.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of non-small cell lung cancer segmentectomy cases (2013-2021) from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database was performed. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting and compared by operative approach. Volume trends, outcomes, and nodal upstaging were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 9927 patients who underwent segmentectomy, 84.8% underwent minimally invasive surgery, with robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery becoming the most common approach in 2019. Open segmentectomy is more likely to be performed at low-volume centers (P < .0001), whereas robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more likely to be performed at high-volume centers (P < .0001). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery had a higher open conversion rate than robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (odds ratio, 11.8; CI, 7.01-21.6; P < .001). Minimally invasive surgery had less 30-day morbidity compared with open segmentectomy (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.94; P = .013; robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery odds ratio, 0.59; CI, 0.43-0.81; P = .001). The number of nodes and stations harvested were highest for robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; however, N1 upstaging was more likely in open compared with robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (odds ratio, 0.63; CI, 0.45-0.89; P < .007) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (odds ratio, 0.61; CI, 0.46-0.83; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentectomy volume has increased considerably, with robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery becoming the most common approach. Minimally invasive surgery has less major morbidity compared with open segmentectomy, with no difference between video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. However, risk of open conversion is higher with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery had increased nodal harvest, whereas hilar nodal upstaging was highest with thoracotomy. This study reveals significant differences in outcomes exist between segmentectomy operative approach; the impact of approach on survival merits further investigation.

摘要

背景

肺段切除术在非小细胞肺癌治疗中的应用日益增多。然而,关于开放手术、机器人辅助手术和电视辅助胸腔镜手术这几种手术方式的比较结果数据有限。

方法

对胸外科医师协会普通胸外科数据库中2013年至2021年的非小细胞肺癌肺段切除术病例进行回顾性队列研究。使用治疗权重的逆概率对基线特征进行平衡,并按手术方式进行比较。评估手术量趋势、手术结果和淋巴结分期升级情况。

结果

在9927例行肺段切除术的患者中,84.8%接受了微创手术,其中机器人辅助胸腔镜手术在2019年成为最常用的手术方式。开放肺段切除术更有可能在手术量低的中心进行(P <.0001),而机器人辅助胸腔镜手术更有可能在手术量高的中心进行(P <.0001)。电视辅助胸腔镜手术的开放转换率高于机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(优势比为11.8;可信区间为7.01 - 21.6;P <.001)。与开放肺段切除术相比,微创手术的30天发病率更低(电视辅助胸腔镜手术优势比为0.71;95%可信区间为0.55 - 0.94;P =.013;机器人辅助胸腔镜手术优势比为0.59;可信区间为0.43 - 0.81;P =.001)。机器人辅助胸腔镜手术获取的淋巴结数量和站数最多;然而,与机器人辅助胸腔镜手术相比,开放手术的N1分期升级更常见(优势比为0.63;可信区间为0.45 - 0.89;P <.007),与电视辅助胸腔镜手术相比也是如此(优势比为0.61;可信区间为0.46 - 0.83;P =.001)。

结论

肺段切除术的手术量有了显著增加,机器人辅助胸腔镜手术成为最常用的手术方式。与开放肺段切除术相比,微创手术的主要发病率更低,电视辅助胸腔镜手术和机器人辅助胸腔镜手术之间无差异。然而,电视辅助胸腔镜手术的开放转换风险更高。机器人辅助胸腔镜手术增加了淋巴结的获取量,而开胸手术的肺门淋巴结分期升级情况最为严重。本研究揭示了肺段切除术不同手术方式的手术结果存在显著差异;手术方式对生存率的影响值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验