• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EPIC-CP 先导试验研究方案:一项多中心、随机对照试验,旨在调查社会处方对澳大利亚脑瘫儿童的可行性和可接受性。

EPIC-CP pilot trial study protocol: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial investigating the feasibility and acceptability of social prescribing for Australian children with cerebral palsy.

机构信息

Community Paediatrics Research Group, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Population Child Health Clinical Research Group, University of New South Wales Medicine & Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 13;14(7):e076304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076304.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076304
PMID:39002958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11255413/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The social determinants of health contribute to poorer health outcomes for children with cerebral palsy (CP) and are barriers to families accessing health services. At an individual level, social determinants of health are experienced as unmet social needs, for example, unsafe housing conditions. There is emerging evidence that clinical pathways for the systematic identification and referral to services for unmet social needs can support families to address these needs. These clinical pathways have not been implemented for children with CP. The objectives are to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of two co-designed social needs clinical pathways for parents/caregivers of children with CP-social prescribing (ie, Community Linker plus resource pack) compared with resource pack only.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This pilot randomised controlled trial will run at the three tertiary paediatric rehabilitation services in New South Wales, Australia. A total of 120 participants will be recruited, with randomisation stratified by study site. A survey tool will be used to identify families experiencing unmet social needs. Parents/caregivers who report one or more unmet social need/s and consent will be eligible. The active control group will receive a resource pack containing information on community services to support unmet social needs. The social prescribing intervention group will receive one-on-one Community Linker support, in addition to the resource pack. The survey tool, intervention, logic model, and resource pack were co-designed with patient families and their healthcare workers. Feasibility of the research design and the clinical pathways will be evaluated using the number/proportion of parents/caregivers who complete the survey tool, consent, engage with the intervention, and complete research measures. Acceptability will be evaluated using questionnaires and qualitative interviews.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Human research ethics approval was granted by the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH01688). Participants and stakeholders will receive updates and findings via regular communication channels including meetings, presentations, and publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: 12622001459718.

摘要

简介

健康的社会决定因素导致脑瘫(CP)患儿的健康结果较差,并且是家庭获得卫生服务的障碍。在个人层面上,健康的社会决定因素表现为未满足的社会需求,例如不安全的住房条件。有新的证据表明,用于系统识别和转介未满足的社会需求服务的临床途径可以支持家庭满足这些需求。这些临床途径尚未应用于脑瘫患儿。本研究的目的是调查两种共同设计的 CP 患儿父母/照顾者的社会需求临床途径(即社区联络者加资源包)与仅资源包相比的可行性和可接受性,社区联络者即提供社区资源信息和转介服务。

方法和分析

这项试点随机对照试验将在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的三个三级儿科康复服务机构进行。共招募 120 名参与者,按研究地点进行分层随机分组。调查工具将用于识别经历未满足社会需求的家庭。报告一个或多个未满足的社会需求/并同意的父母/照顾者有资格参加。主动对照组将获得一个包含社区服务信息的资源包,以支持未满足的社会需求。社会处方干预组除了资源包外,还将接受一对一的社区联络者支持。调查工具、干预措施、逻辑模型和资源包是与患者家庭及其医疗保健工作者共同设计的。研究设计和临床途径的可行性将通过完成调查工具、同意、参与干预和完成研究措施的父母/照顾者的数量/比例来评估。可接受性将通过问卷调查和定性访谈进行评估。

伦理和传播

悉尼儿童医院网络人类研究伦理委员会已批准人体研究伦理(2022/ETH01688)。参与者和利益相关者将通过定期沟通渠道(包括会议、演示和出版物)获得更新和研究结果。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心:12622001459718。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc4/11255413/f4f439ea071b/bmjopen-14-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc4/11255413/e9e0559b6e8a/bmjopen-14-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc4/11255413/f4f439ea071b/bmjopen-14-7-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc4/11255413/e9e0559b6e8a/bmjopen-14-7-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc4/11255413/f4f439ea071b/bmjopen-14-7-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
EPIC-CP pilot trial study protocol: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial investigating the feasibility and acceptability of social prescribing for Australian children with cerebral palsy.EPIC-CP 先导试验研究方案:一项多中心、随机对照试验,旨在调查社会处方对澳大利亚脑瘫儿童的可行性和可接受性。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 13;14(7):e076304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076304.
2
Codesigning a social prescribing pathway to address the social determinant of health concerns of children with cerebral palsy and their families in Australia: a protocol for a mixed-methods formative research study.为解决澳大利亚脑瘫儿童及其家庭的健康决定因素问题,共同设计社会转介途径:一项混合方法形成性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e066346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066346.
3
Study protocol for the Healthier Wealthier Families (HWF) pilot randomised controlled trial: testing the feasibility of delivering financial counselling to families with young children who are identified as experiencing financial hardship by community-based nurses.健康富有家庭(HWF)试验性随机对照研究方案:由社区护士识别并确定经济困难的有幼儿的家庭,以测试为其提供理财咨询的可行性。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 21;11(5):e044488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044488.
4
Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of populations living with cancer attending outpatient treatment at a major metropolitan hospital in Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility trial.健康导航员干预措施,以满足澳大利亚一家大型大都市医院接受门诊治疗的癌症患者的未满足的社会需求:一项混合方法可行性试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 28;14(11):e080403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080403.
5
Development of a new social prescribing intervention for families of children with cerebral palsy.为脑瘫儿童家庭开发一种新的社会处方干预措施。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2025 Feb;67(2):223-234. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.16039. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
6
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
7
Can RESPiratory hospital Admissions in children with cerebral palsy be reduced? A feasibility randomised Controlled Trial pilot study protocol (RESP-ACT).脑瘫儿童的住院率能否降低?一项可行性随机对照试验的研究方案(RESP-ACT)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 15;14(2):e076730. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076730.
8
Investigating a caregiver-assisted social skills group programme for primary and early high school-aged children with acquired brain injury or cerebral palsy: protocol for a pilot mixed-methods, two-group randomised trial of PEERS Plus.针对患有后天性脑损伤或脑瘫的小学及初中早期儿童,研究一项由照料者辅助的社交技能小组计划:PEERS Plus的混合方法、两组随机试验的试点方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 4;15(1):e095354. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095354.
9
A qualitative study investigating the experiences of unmet social needs for children with cerebral palsy and their families: perspectives of parents and clinicians.一项关于脑瘫儿童及其家庭未满足的社会需求经历的定性研究:家长和临床医生的观点
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 May;47(9):2278-2287. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2391557. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
10
Study protocol: peer delivered early intervention (Learning through Everyday Activities with Parents for Infants at risk of Cerebral Palsy: LEAP-CP) for First Nation Australian infants at high risk of cerebral palsy - an RCT study.研究方案:通过同伴提供早期干预(通过与父母进行日常活动来学习,以预防高危脑瘫婴儿:LEAP-CP),对有脑瘫高风险的澳大利亚原住民婴儿进行干预 - 一项 RCT 研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 13;13(3):e059531. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059531.

本文引用的文献

1
Social determinants of health for children with cerebral palsy and their families.儿童脑瘫及其家庭的健康社会决定因素。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2024 Jan;66(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15640. Epub 2023 May 14.
2
Codesigning a social prescribing pathway to address the social determinant of health concerns of children with cerebral palsy and their families in Australia: a protocol for a mixed-methods formative research study.为解决澳大利亚脑瘫儿童及其家庭的健康决定因素问题,共同设计社会转介途径:一项混合方法形成性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e066346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066346.
3
Clinical Pathways for the Identification and Referral for Social Needs: A Systematic Review.
社会需求识别与转诊的临床路径:一项系统综述
Pediatrics. 2023 Mar 1;151(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-056837.
4
Social prescribing from the patient's perspective: A literature review.从患者角度看社会处方:一项文献综述。
J Gen Fam Med. 2022 Apr 26;23(5):299-309. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.551. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Global prevalence of cerebral palsy: A systematic analysis.全球脑瘫患病率:系统分析。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Dec;64(12):1494-1506. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15346. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
6
Determinants of Hospital-Based Health Service Utilization in Cerebral Palsy: a Systematic Review.脑瘫患者基于医院的卫生服务利用的决定因素:系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug;103(8):1628-1637. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.12.003. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
7
Impact of social disadvantage on cerebral palsy severity.社会劣势对脑瘫严重程度的影响。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 May;61(5):586-592. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14026. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
8
Two-item PROMIS® global physical and mental health scales.两项患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS®)总体身心健康量表
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41687-017-0003-8. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
9
Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions.公共卫生干预措施共同生产与原型制作框架的开发。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 4;17(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4695-8.
10
Effects of Social Needs Screening and In-Person Service Navigation on Child Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社会需求筛查和现场服务导航对儿童健康的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Nov 7;170(11):e162521. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2521.