• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BRCA1/2 阴性先证者的血缘亲属中的高危致病性种系变异。

High-risk pathogenic germline variants in blood relatives of BRCA1/2 negative probands.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Genomics, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR), 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Institute for Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Japan.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2024 Nov;31(6):1028-1036. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01615-0. Epub 2024 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s12282-024-01615-0
PMID:39003386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11489291/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tailored, preventive cancer care requires the identification of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) among potentially at-risk blood relatives (BRs). Cascade testing is carried out for BRs of probands who are positive for PGVs of an inherited cancer but not for negative probands. This study was conducted to examine the prevalence of PGVs for BRs of PGV-negative probands.

METHODS

PGV prevalence was assessed for 682 BRs of 281 probands with BRCA1/BRCA2 wild-type hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome.

RESULTS

PGVs were discovered in 22 (45.8%) of the 48 BRs of the PGV-positive probands and in 14 (2.2%) of 634 BRs of the PGV-negative probands. Eleven PGVs on high-risk BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 genes were present only in BRs and not in the probands (probands vs BRs in Fisher exact test; p = 0.0104; odds ratio [OR] = 0.000 [0.000-0.5489 of 95% confidence interval]), partly due to the nature of the selection criteria. The enrichment of high-risk PGVs among BRs was also significant as compared with a non-cancer East Asian population (p = 0.0016; OR = 3.0791 [1.5521-5.6694]). PGV prevalence, risk class of gene, and genotype concordance were unaffected by the cancer history among BRs.

CONCLUSION

These findings imply the necessity to construct a novel testing scheme to complement cascade testing.

摘要

背景

定制化的预防性癌症护理需要在有潜在风险的血缘亲属(BRs)中识别致病性种系变异(PGVs)。对种系检测呈阳性的先证者的 BRs 进行级联检测,但对种系检测呈阴性的先证者不进行。本研究旨在检测种系检测呈阴性的先证者的 BRs 中 PGV 的发生率。

方法

对 281 名种系检测呈 BRCA1/BRCA2 野生型遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)综合征的先证者的 682 名 BRs 进行 PGV 发生率评估。

结果

在 22 名(45.8%)种系检测呈阳性的先证者的 48 名 BRs 中发现了 PGVs,在 634 名种系检测呈阴性的先证者的 14 名 BRs 中发现了 14 名(种系检测呈阳性的先证者与种系检测呈阴性的先证者的 BRs 相比,Fisher 确切检验;p=0.0104;比值比[OR]=0.000[0.000-0.5489],95%置信区间)存在仅在 BRs 中而不在先证者中发现的 11 个高危 BRCA1、BRCA2 和 TP53 基因 PGVs,部分原因是选择标准的性质。与非癌症东亚人群相比,BRs 中高危 PGVs 的富集也具有显著意义(p=0.0016;OR=3.0791[1.5521-5.6694])。BRs 中的癌症病史对 PGV 发生率、基因风险类别和基因型一致性没有影响。

结论

这些发现意味着有必要构建一种新的检测方案来补充级联检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/11489291/0344dd9ca357/12282_2024_1615_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/11489291/26a7fcf7da38/12282_2024_1615_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/11489291/0a5b1cbd979d/12282_2024_1615_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/11489291/798529c7ef71/12282_2024_1615_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/11489291/0344dd9ca357/12282_2024_1615_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/11489291/26a7fcf7da38/12282_2024_1615_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/11489291/0a5b1cbd979d/12282_2024_1615_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/11489291/798529c7ef71/12282_2024_1615_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/11489291/0344dd9ca357/12282_2024_1615_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
High-risk pathogenic germline variants in blood relatives of BRCA1/2 negative probands.BRCA1/2 阴性先证者的血缘亲属中的高危致病性种系变异。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Nov;31(6):1028-1036. doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01615-0. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
2
Germline testing of , , and c.1100delC in 1514 triple negative familial and isolated breast cancers from a single centre, with extended testing of , and in over 400.在一个中心对 1514 例三阴性家族性和散发性乳腺癌进行 、 、 和 c.1100delC 的种系检测,并对 400 多例以上的 、 、 进行了扩展检测。
J Med Genet. 2024 Mar 21;61(4):385-391. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109671.
3
Risk of Syndrome-Associated Cancers Among First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma With Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Germline Variants.胰腺导管腺癌患者携带致病性或疑似致病性种系变异的一级亲属患综合征相关癌症的风险。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Jul 1;9(7):955-961. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0806.
4
Optimization of prediction methods for risk assessment of pathogenic germline variants in the Japanese population.优化日本人群种系致病性变异风险评估的预测方法。
Cancer Sci. 2021 Aug;112(8):3338-3348. doi: 10.1111/cas.14986. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
5
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutational profile and prevalence in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) probands from Southern Brazil: Are international testing criteria appropriate for this specific population?巴西南部遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)先证者中BRCA1和BRCA2的突变谱及患病率:国际检测标准是否适用于这一特定人群?
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 21;12(11):e0187630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187630. eCollection 2017.
6
Statewide Retrospective Review of Familial Pancreatic Cancer in Delaware, and Frequency of Genetic Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer Kindreds.特拉华州家族性胰腺癌的全州回顾性研究以及胰腺癌家族中基因突变的频率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1729-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5026-x. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
7
Prevalence of germline variants in consensus moderate-to-high-risk predisposition genes to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2-negative Brazilian patients.BRCA1/2 阴性的巴西患者中常见中等至高风险遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感基因种系变异。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb;185(3):851-861. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05985-9. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
8
Variants of cancer susceptibility genes in Korean BRCA1/2 mutation-negative patients with high risk for hereditary breast cancer.韩国 BRCA1/2 突变阴性遗传性乳腺癌高危患者中癌症易感性基因的变异。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3940-y.
9
Prevalence and Spectrum of Germline Variants in Central Italian High Risk or Familial Breast/Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Monocentric Study.意大利中部高危或家族性乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者种系变异的流行率和谱:一项单中心研究。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Aug 12;11(8):925. doi: 10.3390/genes11080925.
10
Spectrum of germline pathogenic variants in Brazilian hereditary breast/ovarian cancer cases.巴西遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌病例中种系致病性变异的谱。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Oct;207(3):615-624. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07383-x. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between patient-reported health-related quality of life as measured with the SF-36 or SF-12 and their mortality risk in patients with diverse cancer type: a meta-analysis.使用SF-36或SF-12量表测量的患者报告的健康相关生活质量与不同癌症类型患者的死亡风险之间的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb;30(2):252-266. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02659-0. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
What happens in the long term: Uptake of cancer surveillance and prevention strategies among at-risk relatives with pathogenic variants detected via cascade testing.长期来看:通过级联检测发现致病性变异的高危亲属中癌症监测和预防策略的采用情况。
Cancer. 2022 Dec 15;128(24):4241-4250. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34482. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
2
Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.遗传性癌症综合征的级联检测:我们是否应该转向直系亲属接触?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 10;40(35):4129-4143. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00303. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Cascade Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer Risk: An Underutilized Tool for Cancer Prevention.
遗传性癌症风险的级联基因检测:一种未充分利用的癌症预防工具。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Nov;5:1387-1396. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00163.
4
Breast Cancer Risk Genes - Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women.乳腺癌风险基因 - 超过 113000 名女性的关联分析。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):428-439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913948. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
5
A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer.基于人群的先前与乳腺癌相关的基因研究。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):440-451. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005936. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.遗传/家族性高风险评估:乳腺癌、卵巢癌和胰腺癌,第 2.2021 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):77-102. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001.
7
Prevalence of disease-causing genes in Japanese patients with -wildtype hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.日本野生型遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征患者中致病基因的患病率
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 Jun 12;6:25. doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-0163-1. eCollection 2020.
8
Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention.有效预防乳腺癌的关键步骤。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2020 Aug;20(8):417-436. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes and Risk Assessment: ACOG COMMITTEE OPINION, Number 793.遗传性癌症综合征与风险评估:ACOG 委员会意见,第 793 号。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):e143-e149. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003562.
10
Analysis of hereditary cancer syndromes by using a panel of genes: novel and multiple pathogenic mutations.利用基因组合分析遗传性癌症综合征:新的和多种致病性突变。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5756-4.