• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化日本人群种系致病性变异风险评估的预测方法。

Optimization of prediction methods for risk assessment of pathogenic germline variants in the Japanese population.

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Clinical Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer Sci. 2021 Aug;112(8):3338-3348. doi: 10.1111/cas.14986. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1111/cas.14986
PMID:34036661
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8353892/
Abstract

Predicting pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in breast cancer patients is important for selecting optimal therapeutics and implementing risk reduction strategies. However, PGV risk factors and the performance of prediction methods in the Japanese population remain unclear. We investigated clinicopathological risk factors using the Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) breast cancer risk evaluation tool to predict BRCA PGVs in unselected Japanese breast cancer patients (n = 1,995). Eleven breast cancer susceptibility genes were analyzed using target-capture sequencing in a previous study; the PGV prevalence in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 was 0.75%, 3.1%, and 0.45%, respectively. Significant associations were found between the presence of BRCA PGVs and early disease onset, number of familial cancer cases (up to third-degree relatives), triple-negative breast cancer patients under the age of 60, and ovarian cancer history (all P < .0001). In total, 816 patients (40.9%) satisfied the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for recommending multigene testing. The sensitivity and specificity of the NCCN criteria for discriminating PGV carriers from noncarriers were 71.3% and 60.7%, respectively. The TC model showed good discrimination for predicting BRCA PGVs (area under the curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.81). Furthermore, use of the TC model with an optimized cutoff of TC score ≥0.16% in addition to the NCCN guidelines improved the predictive efficiency for high-risk groups (sensitivity, 77.2%; specificity, 54.8%; about 11 genes). Given the influence of ethnic differences on prediction, we consider that further studies are warranted to elucidate the role of environmental and genetic factors for realizing precise prediction.

摘要

预测乳腺癌患者的致病性种系变异(PGV)对于选择最佳治疗方法和实施降低风险策略非常重要。然而,PGV 风险因素以及预测方法在日本人群中的表现仍不清楚。我们使用 Tyrer-Cuzick(TC)乳腺癌风险评估工具调查了临床病理危险因素,以预测未经选择的日本乳腺癌患者中的 BRCA PGV(n=1995)。在之前的研究中,使用靶向捕获测序分析了 11 个乳腺癌易感基因;BRCA1、BRCA2 和 PALB2 中的 PGV 患病率分别为 0.75%、3.1%和 0.45%。BRCA PGV 的存在与疾病早期发病、家族癌症病例数(最多三级亲属)、60 岁以下三阴性乳腺癌患者和卵巢癌病史之间存在显著关联(均 P<0.0001)。共有 816 名患者(40.9%)符合美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)推荐多基因检测的指南。NCCN 标准区分 PGV 携带者和非携带者的敏感性和特异性分别为 71.3%和 60.7%。TC 模型在预测 BRCA PGV 方面具有良好的区分能力(曲线下面积,0.75;95%置信区间,0.69-0.81)。此外,除了 NCCN 指南外,使用 TC 模型并将 TC 评分优化截断值设为≥0.16%,可以提高高危人群的预测效率(敏感性,77.2%;特异性,54.8%;约 11 个基因)。鉴于种族差异对预测的影响,我们认为有必要进一步研究以阐明环境和遗传因素在实现精准预测中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/5172f8aac988/CAS-112-3338-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/2af56bcbbb55/CAS-112-3338-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/fbefbb430198/CAS-112-3338-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/2f57cca1c19b/CAS-112-3338-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/92f83c401238/CAS-112-3338-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/a4e54316e1a1/CAS-112-3338-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/5172f8aac988/CAS-112-3338-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/2af56bcbbb55/CAS-112-3338-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/fbefbb430198/CAS-112-3338-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/2f57cca1c19b/CAS-112-3338-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/92f83c401238/CAS-112-3338-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/a4e54316e1a1/CAS-112-3338-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2154/8353892/5172f8aac988/CAS-112-3338-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimization of prediction methods for risk assessment of pathogenic germline variants in the Japanese population.优化日本人群种系致病性变异风险评估的预测方法。
Cancer Sci. 2021 Aug;112(8):3338-3348. doi: 10.1111/cas.14986. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
2
Germline testing of , , and c.1100delC in 1514 triple negative familial and isolated breast cancers from a single centre, with extended testing of , and in over 400.在一个中心对 1514 例三阴性家族性和散发性乳腺癌进行 、 、 和 c.1100delC 的种系检测,并对 400 多例以上的 、 、 进行了扩展检测。
J Med Genet. 2024 Mar 21;61(4):385-391. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109671.
3
Comprehensive Proteomic Profiling-derived Immunohistochemistry-based Prediction Models for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Germline Mutation-related Breast Carcinomas.基于全面蛋白质组学分析的免疫组织化学预测模型在 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 种系突变相关乳腺癌中的应用。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Sep;42(9):1262-1272. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001115.
4
Comparison of BRCA versus non-BRCA germline mutations and associated somatic mutation profiles in patients with unselected breast cancer.比较非 BRCA 与 BRCA 种系突变及在未经选择的乳腺癌患者中的相关体细胞突变谱。
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Feb 24;12(4):3140-3155. doi: 10.18632/aging.102783.
5
Mutation status of RAD51C, PALB2 and BRIP1 in 100 Japanese familial breast cancer cases without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.100例无BRCA1和BRCA2突变的日本家族性乳腺癌病例中RAD51C、PALB2和BRIP1的突变状态
Cancer Sci. 2017 Nov;108(11):2287-2294. doi: 10.1111/cas.13350. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
6
Spectrum and clinical relevance of PALB2 germline mutations in 7657 Chinese BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients.7657 例中国 BRCA1/2 阴性乳腺癌患者中 PALB2 种系突变的谱及临床相关性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;179(3):605-614. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05483-7. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
Frequency of mutations in BRCA genes and other candidate genes in high-risk probands or probands with breast or ovarian cancer in the Czech Republic.在捷克共和国,高危先证者或有乳腺癌或卵巢癌先证者的 BRCA 基因和其他候选基因的突变频率。
Mol Biol Rep. 2020 Apr;47(4):2763-2769. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05378-7. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
8
Evaluation of Germline Genetic Testing Criteria in a Hospital-Based Series of Women With Breast Cancer.基于医院的乳腺癌女性队列的种系遗传检测标准评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1409-1418. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02190. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
9
Frequency of heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in genes for Fanconi anemia in patients with non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer: a meta-analysis.非BRCA1/BRCA2乳腺癌患者中范可尼贫血基因杂合种系致病变异的频率:一项荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;182(2):465-476. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05710-6. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
10
High prevalence of deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in arab breast and ovarian cancer patients.在阿拉伯裔乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者中,BRCA1 和 BRCA2 种系突变的高发率。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;168(3):695-702. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4635-4. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent advances in hematopoietic cell transplantation for inherited bone marrow failure syndromes.造血细胞移植治疗遗传性骨髓衰竭综合征的最新进展。
Int J Hematol. 2022 Jul;116(1):16-27. doi: 10.1007/s12185-022-03362-4. Epub 2022 May 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer Risk Genes - Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women.乳腺癌风险基因 - 超过 113000 名女性的关联分析。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):428-439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913948. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
A Population-Based Study of Genes Previously Implicated in Breast Cancer.基于人群的先前与乳腺癌相关的基因研究。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):440-451. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2005936. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
3
Genetic and clinical landscape of breast cancers with germline BRCA1/2 variants.胚系 BRCA1/2 变异的乳腺癌的遗传和临床特征。
Commun Biol. 2020 Oct 16;3(1):578. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01301-9.
4
Prevalence of disease-causing genes in Japanese patients with -wildtype hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.日本野生型遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征患者中致病基因的患病率
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 Jun 12;6:25. doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-0163-1. eCollection 2020.
5
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 1.2020.NCCN 指南解读:遗传/家族性高风险评估:乳腺、卵巢和胰腺,第 1.2020 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):380-391. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0017.
6
Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline.遗传性乳腺癌的管理:美国临床肿瘤学会、美国放射肿瘤学会和外科肿瘤学会指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun 20;38(18):2080-2106. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00299. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
7
The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for systemic treatment of breast cancer, 2018 edition.日本乳腺癌学会乳腺癌全身治疗临床实践指南 2018 年版。
Breast Cancer. 2020 May;27(3):322-331. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01085-0. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
8
Evaluation of Germline Genetic Testing Criteria in a Hospital-Based Series of Women With Breast Cancer.基于医院的乳腺癌女性队列的种系遗传检测标准评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1409-1418. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02190. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
9
Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.BRCA 相关癌症的风险评估、遗传咨询和基因检测:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2019 Aug 20;322(7):652-665. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10987.
10
A systematic review of the international prevalence of mutation in breast cancer.乳腺癌基因突变国际患病率的系统评价。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 11;11:543-561. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S206949. eCollection 2019.