• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氧化锆种植体与钛种植体周围种植体周炎的诱导与转归

Peri-implantitis induction and resolution around zirconia versus titanium implants.

作者信息

Esplin Kaleb C, Tsai Yi-Wen, Vela Kathryn, Diogenes Anibal, Hachem Lea El, Palaiologou Archontia, Cochran David L, Kotsakis Georgios A

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

ITI Scholarship Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2024 Dec;95(12):1180-1189. doi: 10.1002/JPER.23-0573. Epub 2024 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1002/JPER.23-0573
PMID:39003566
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11708443/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared titanium and zirconia implant ligature-induced peri-implant defect progression and response to regenerative surgical intervention.

METHODS

Eight tissue-level endosseous implants were placed in 6 mixed-breed foxhounds, with 2 zirconia and 2 titanium alternating in each hemimandible. Cotton ligatures were placed subgingivally for 16 weeks followed by 8 weeks of spontaneous progression. Standardized radiographs were captured every 2 weeks to evaluate the rate of bone loss. Regenerative surgery was performed utilizing water-jet decontamination, enamel matrix derivative, and locally harvested autogenous bone. After 16 weeks of healing, final radiographic bone levels as well as probing depths, recession, and clinical attachment levels were assessed.

RESULTS

All 48 implants integrated successfully. The final average post-ligature radiographic defects were 2.88 and 3.05 mm for titanium and zirconia implants, respectively. There was no significant difference between materials in the rate of radiographic bone loss (p = 0.09). Following regenerative surgery, the total average amount of radiographic bone gain was 1.41 and 1.20 mm for titanium and zirconia, respectively. The percentage of defect fill was 51.56% and 37.98% (p = 0.03) for titanium and zirconia, respectively. Inter-group differences were minimal for clinical parameters at the time of sacrifice including periodontal pocket depths (p = 0.81), recession (p = 0.98), or clinical attachment levels (p = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found in the rate of peri-implant defect development between titanium and zirconia implants. Both materials gained significant radiographic bone following regenerative surgery with significantly greater defect percentage fill in titanium implants. The final clinical parameters were similar in both groups.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了钛和氧化锆种植体结扎诱导的种植体周围缺损进展情况以及对再生性外科干预的反应。

方法

在6只混种猎狐犬中植入8枚组织水平的骨内种植体,每侧下颌骨交替植入2枚氧化锆和2枚钛种植体。在龈下放置棉线结扎16周,随后进行8周的自然进展期。每2周拍摄标准化X线片以评估骨吸收速率。采用水刀去污、釉基质衍生物和局部采集的自体骨进行再生性手术。愈合16周后,评估最终的X线骨水平以及探诊深度、牙龈退缩和临床附着水平。

结果

所有48枚种植体均成功植入。钛和氧化锆种植体结扎后的最终平均X线缺损分别为2.88和3.05毫米。两种材料在X线骨吸收速率上无显著差异(p = 0.09)。再生性手术后,钛和氧化锆种植体的平均X线骨增量分别为1.41和1.20毫米。钛和氧化锆种植体的缺损填充百分比分别为51.56%和37.98%(p = 0.03)。处死时两组间临床参数的组间差异极小,包括牙周袋深度(p = 0.81)、牙龈退缩(p = 0.98)或临床附着水平(p = 0.51)。

结论

钛和氧化锆种植体周围缺损发展速率无显著差异。两种材料在再生性手术后均获得了显著的X线骨增量,钛种植体的缺损填充百分比显著更高。两组最终的临床参数相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c7/11708443/768a5478ec5b/JPER-95-1180-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c7/11708443/156e350dc38b/JPER-95-1180-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c7/11708443/3beca933b4b6/JPER-95-1180-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c7/11708443/e206c6703077/JPER-95-1180-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c7/11708443/768a5478ec5b/JPER-95-1180-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c7/11708443/156e350dc38b/JPER-95-1180-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c7/11708443/3beca933b4b6/JPER-95-1180-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c7/11708443/e206c6703077/JPER-95-1180-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c7/11708443/768a5478ec5b/JPER-95-1180-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Peri-implantitis induction and resolution around zirconia versus titanium implants.氧化锆种植体与钛种植体周围种植体周炎的诱导与转归
J Periodontol. 2024 Dec;95(12):1180-1189. doi: 10.1002/JPER.23-0573. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
2
Ligature-Induced Peri-implant Bone Loss Around Loaded Zirconia and Titanium Implants.结扎诱导的负重氧化锆和钛种植体周围种植体周围骨丢失
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 March/April;34(2):357–365. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7015. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
3
Experimental Peri-Implantitis around Different Types of Implants - A Clinical and Radiographic Study in Dogs.不同类型种植体周围实验性种植体周围炎——犬的临床和影像学研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e661-9. doi: 10.1111/cid.12303. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
4
Progression of experimental chronic peri-implantitis in dogs: clinical and radiographic evaluation.犬实验性慢性种植体周围炎的进展:临床和影像学评估
J Periodontol. 2005 Aug;76(8):1367-73. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.1367.
5
One-piece zirconia oral implants: one-year results from a prospective case series. 2. Three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) reconstruction.一体式氧化锆口腔种植体:一项前瞻性病例系列研究的一年结果。2. 三单位固定义齿(FDP)修复。
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 May;40(5):553-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12093. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
6
Crestal bone response to loaded zirconia and titanium implants: a radiographic and histometric analysis in canines.负载氧化锆和钛种植体对牙槽骨的反应:犬的放射学和组织计量学分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Oct;24(10):3609-3617. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03235-2. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
Use of TiBrush for surface decontamination at peri-implantitis sites in dogs: Radiographic and histological outcomes.在犬类种植体周围炎部位使用TiBrush进行表面去污:影像学和组织学结果。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2019 Feb;10(1):e12378. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12378. Epub 2018 Nov 25.
8
Bone response to functionally loaded, two-piece zirconia implants: A preclinical histometric study.功能负载的两部分氧化锆植入物的骨反应:临床前组织计量学研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29(3):277-289. doi: 10.1111/clr.13112. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
9
Tissue integration of zirconia and titanium implants with and without buccal dehiscence defects-A histologic and radiographic preclinical study.种植体颊侧骨缺损对氧化锆和钛种植体骨整合的影响:一项组织学和影像学的临床前研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Jul;30(7):660-669. doi: 10.1111/clr.13451. Epub 2019 May 12.
10
Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.钛、钛合金和氧化锆牙科种植体的骨整合:当前的知识和未解决的问题。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):22-40. doi: 10.1111/prd.12179.

本文引用的文献

1
The Use of Enamel Matrix Derivative during Surgical Therapy for Peri-Implantitis: A Case Series.牙釉质基质衍生物在种植体周围炎手术治疗中的应用:病例系列
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Dec 30;12(1):11. doi: 10.3390/dj12010011.
2
Prevention and treatment of peri-implant diseases-The EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline.种植体周围病的预防和治疗——EFP S3 级临床实践指南。
J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Jun;50 Suppl 26:4-76. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13823. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
3
Assessment of titanium release following non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment: A randomized clinical trial.
非手术性种植体周围炎治疗后钛离子释放的评估:一项随机临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2023 Sep;94(9):1122-1132. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0716. Epub 2023 May 2.
4
Mechanical Factors Implicated in Zirconia Implant Fracture Placed within the Anterior Region-A Systematic Review.涉及前牙区氧化锆种植体骨折的机械因素——一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Feb 2;10(2):22. doi: 10.3390/dj10020022.
5
Surgical treatment of experimental peri-implantitis using mechanical and chemical decontamination procedures: A pre-clinical in vivo study.使用机械和化学去污程序治疗实验性种植体周围炎的手术治疗:一项临床前体内研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2022 May;49(5):518-525. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13607. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
6
Efficacy of alternative or adjunctive measures to conventional non-surgical and surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.替代或辅助常规非手术和手术治疗种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎的措施的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Nov 15;7(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00388-x.
7
Is Implantoplasty Efficacious at Treating Peri-Implantitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.种植体周围炎的治疗是否有效?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Nov;79(11):2270-2279. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.06.015. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
8
Peri-implantitis is not periodontitis: Scientific discoveries shed light on microbiome-biomaterial interactions that may determine disease phenotype.种植体周围炎不等同于牙周炎:科学发现揭示了微生物组-生物材料相互作用,这些作用可能决定疾病表型。
Periodontol 2000. 2021 Jun;86(1):231-240. doi: 10.1111/prd.12372. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
9
Effect of implant cleaning on titanium particle dissolution and cytocompatibility.种植体清洗对钛颗粒溶解和细胞相容性的影响。
J Periodontol. 2021 Apr;92(4):580-591. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0186. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
10
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.ARRIVE 指南 2.0:报告动物研究的更新指南。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 14;18(7):e3000410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410. eCollection 2020 Jul.