Clinical comparison of total gastrectomy with single-vessel transection Roux-en-Y reconstruction vs total gastrectomy with conventional Roux-en-Y reconstruction for proximal gastric cancer.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of single-vessel transection Roux-en-Y (SR-Y) reconstruction after total gastrectomy.

METHODS

A total of 194 patients with proximal gastric cancer were prospectively recruited at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between January 2021 and September 2022. This study included 97 patients who underwent conventional Roux-en-Y reconstruction and 97 patients who underwent SR-Y reconstruction. Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were compared between the conventional and single-vessel transection groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups in terms of age (P = .882), gender (P = .595), body mass index (P = .683), tumor location (P = .568), TNM stage (P = .122), tumor size (P = .927), anemia (P = .756), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = .730), and surgical approach (P = .592). However, compared with the conventional group, the single-vessel transection group had a shorter operation time (162.5 ± 37.6 vs 178.5 ± 48.3 min, respectively; P = .011) and less intraoperative bleeding (167.2 ± 91.8 vs 207.8 ± 167.5 mL, respectively; P = .037) after complete reservation of the terminal jejunal vascular arches. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in tensions in the jejunal mesentery, durations of peritoneal drainage, postoperative hospital stay durations, the number of lymph node dissections, and early complications between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

SR-Y reconstruction can simplify surgical procedures, reduce operating time, and minimize intraoperative bleeding without increasing tensions in the jejunal mesentery or short-term complications. It is feasible and safe and worth further promotion in clinical practice.