Suppr超能文献

市面上出售的活动监测器,如 fitbit charge 和 apple watch,在全膝关节置换术后使用助行器的患者中,其有效性较差。

Commercially available activity monitors such as the fitbit charge and apple watch show poor validity in patients with gait aids after total knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, Qc, H3G 1A4, Canada.

Montreal General Hospital, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 15;19(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04892-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to determine the validity of consumer grade step counter devices during the early recovery period after knee replacement surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-three participants wore a Fitbit Charge or Apple Watch Series 4 smart watch and performed a walking test along a 50-metre hallway. There were 9 males and 14 females included in the study with an average age of 68.5 years and BMI of 32. Each patient wore both the Fitbit Charge and Apple Watch while completing the walking test and an observer counted the ground truth value using a thumb-push tally counter. This test was repeated pre-operatively with no gait aid, immediately post operatively with a walker, at 6 weeks follow up with a cane and at 6 months with no gait aid. Bland-Altman plots were performed for all walking tests to compare the agreement between measurement techniques.

RESULTS

Mean overall agreement of step count for pre-operative and at 6 months for subjects walking without gait aids was excellent for both the Apple Watch vs. actual and Fitbit vs. actual with bias values ranging from - 0.87 to 1.36 with limits of agreement (LOA) ranging between - 10.82 and 15.91. While using a walker both devices showed extremely little agreement with the actual step count with bias values between 22.5 and 24.37 with LOA between 11.7 and 33.3. At 6 weeks post-op while using a cane, both the Apple Watch and Fitbit devices had a range of bias values between - 2.8 and 5.73 with LOA between - 13.51 and 24.97.

CONCLUSIONS

These devices show poor validity in the early post operative setting, especially with the use of gait aids, and therefore results should be interpreted with caution.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在膝关节置换手术后的早期康复期间,消费级计步器设备的有效性。

方法

23 名参与者佩戴 Fitbit Charge 或 Apple Watch Series 4 智能手表,在 50 米长的走廊上进行步行测试。研究包括 9 名男性和 14 名女性,平均年龄为 68.5 岁,BMI 为 32。每位患者在进行步行测试时都佩戴 Fitbit Charge 和 Apple Watch,同时有一名观察者使用拇指推计数器来计数真实值。该测试在术前无步态辅助、术后立即使用助行器、术后 6 周使用手杖和术后 6 个月无步态辅助时重复进行。对所有步行测试进行 Bland-Altman 图分析,以比较测量技术之间的一致性。

结果

对于术前和术后 6 个月无步态辅助的受试者,Apple Watch 与实际计步器的总步数平均一致性非常好,偏差值范围在-0.87 至 1.36 之间,一致性界限(LOA)范围在-10.82 至 15.91 之间。使用助行器时,两种设备与实际计步器的一致性非常差,偏差值在 22.5 至 24.37 之间,LOA 在 11.7 至 33.3 之间。术后 6 周使用手杖时,Apple Watch 和 Fitbit 设备的偏差值范围在-2.8 至 5.73 之间,LOA 在-13.51 至 24.97 之间。

结论

这些设备在术后早期阶段的有效性较差,特别是在使用步态辅助器时,因此结果应谨慎解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5a/11247726/736bbb1d3fb9/13018_2024_4892_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验