Suppr超能文献

评估拐杖、腋杖和助行器等步态辅助器具对健康个体步数计数器准确性的影响。

Evaluation of the Effect of Gait Aids, Such as Canes, Crutches, and Walkers, on the Accuracy of Step Counters in Healthy Individuals.

作者信息

Kooner Paul, Schubert Taran, Howard James L, Lanting Brent A, Teeter Matthew G, Vasarhelyi Edward M

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Orthop Res Rev. 2021 Jan 7;13:1-8. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S292255. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wearable step-counter devices have become inexpensive tools that enable patients, researchers, and clinicians to objectively monitor physical activity. It is unknown how the use of gait aids, such as canes, crutches, and walkers, affects the accuracy of these devices. Such gait aids are commonly used by patients with chronic physical impairment and after joint-replacement surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of gait aids on the accuracy of wearable step counters.

METHODS

Nine healthy participants wore a Fitbit step counter on their wrist and hip and performed eight walking tests with canes, crutches, and walkers. Bland-Altman analyses were performed for all eight walking tests in order to compare agreement between measurement techniques.

RESULTS

Mean overall agreement for subjects walking without gait aids in the hip group was excellent, showing a bias of -2.9, with limits of agreement (LOAs) between -8.72 and 2.95. For use of canes or crutches, the Bland-Altman plots had a range of bias values between the hip and wrist counters from -7.22 to 33.56, with LOAs from -98.55 to 124.2. The wrist counter during the four-wheeled walking test showed very little agreement with the actual step count, with a bias value of 91.33 and LOAs of 64.1-118.6, illustrating exceptionally unreliable step counts.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that these widely commercially available step counters have poor reliability with gait aids, especially walkers, which should be taken into account in research and clinical settings.

摘要

背景

可穿戴步数计数器设备已成为一种价格低廉的工具,使患者、研究人员和临床医生能够客观地监测身体活动。目前尚不清楚使用拐杖、腋杖和助行器等步态辅助器具会如何影响这些设备的准确性。慢性身体损伤患者以及关节置换手术后的患者通常会使用此类步态辅助器具。本研究的目的是确定步态辅助器具对可穿戴步数计数器准确性的影响。

方法

九名健康参与者在手腕和髋部佩戴Fitbit步数计数器,并使用拐杖、腋杖和助行器进行了八项步行测试。对所有八项步行测试进行了布兰德-奥特曼分析,以比较测量技术之间的一致性。

结果

在髋部组中,不使用步态辅助器具行走的受试者的总体平均一致性极佳,偏差为-2.9,一致性界限(LOA)在-8.72至2.95之间。对于使用拐杖或腋杖的情况,布兰德-奥特曼图显示髋部计数器和手腕计数器之间的偏差值范围为-7.22至33.56,LOA为-98.55至124.2。在四轮步行测试期间,手腕计数器与实际步数的一致性非常低,偏差值为91.33,LOA为64.1-118.6,表明步数计数异常不可靠。

结论

本研究表明这些广泛商业销售的步数计数器在使用步态辅助器具时可靠性较差,尤其是助行器,在研究和临床环境中应予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61d7/7802358/02415aef6e77/ORR-13-1-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验